Nadja Rupprechter

@naru96.bsky.social

phd student and research & teaching assistant at IKMZ | University of Zurich🇨🇭| media psych & comm | human-AI relationships & parasocial phenomena | open science nadjarupprechter.com All memes crafted with love. Gaming and gym 🫂

Nice, I can require my BA students to use Quarto Markdown for their thesis analyses. Purely for their scientific development, of course, and definitely not because I'd rather not squint at 400 lines of unannotated raw R script with no structure 😇 Would you look at that!!

Bild

Does any one of you smart folks have experience with, or pointers to literature on, bot exclusion strategies in surveys? We've built a few detection strategies into ours (CAPTCHA, AI/human task, attention checks, math tasks) – but it's not entirely clear how to use that information best. #commsky

Reflecting on my teaching philosophy for a portfolio. Funny how my mostly negative experiences in a Montessori class as a kid, unfortunately, ended up defining what I value and how I teach now: freedom and structure, together 💭

That's a wrap on my Research-in-Practice Lab! And what better way to cap off a year-long journey towards your bachelor theses than with a cold lemonade! It was an absolute pleasure to supervise this lively bunch. Proud ⭐

BildBild

The Ideology 2.0 dataset is now publicly accessible. 280,000 unique sessions, ~40 implicit measures, ~30 self-report items on the same topics as the implicit measures, 25 individual difference questionnaires, and dozens of individual self-report items. More: osf.io/2483h/overview

OSF

osf.io

Brian Nosek@briannosek.bsky.social · 4y ago

Are you interested in ideology, morality, political psych, implicit and explicit measures, or individual differences? We are releasing a massive dataset (>280k sessions) with dozens of individual difference measures, implicit and explicit measures. 1/...

Psychology is in the middle of several overlapping crises—replication, generalisability, theory—but this isn't new. Crisis discussions first appeared in the 1920s (!?). The specific topics have changed but the structure seems kind of similar, maybe we can learn something from this? doi.org/czvw7m

The second half of the 1920s may be called ‘‘the Golden Age’’ of crisis declarations in psychology. The diagnosis became so widespread that in 1926 the then influential Viennese psychologist and philosopher Karl Bühler wrote that ‘‘one can now even read in the newspapers that there is a crisis in psychology’’ (Bühler, 1926, p. 455). A great number of such declarations appeared in articles and even book-length studies coming from quite different schools and traditions in psychology (see contributions by Allesch, Hatfield, Hyman, and Sturm in this volume) and from several countries throughout Europe and from North America, having repercussions, too, for philosophy (Feest, this volume).

Schopenhauer likely spent his career watching people win arguments they may have been wrong about and responded by writing down all 38 ways they did it lol. A fun little read on eristic dialectic. I plan to read Toulmin next. Any recs for logic & dialectic rabbit hole welcome!

Bild

We looked for the experimental evidence showing that social media bans benefit youth... and found nothing. Like, lots of studies with null results? No, literally nothing-- there are no experimental studies of social media restriction that target minors like these bans do. Check out our new paper!

Frontiers | We don't know how social media bans will affect youth but we're doing it anyway!

Around the world, governments are banning youth from social media. Proponents of bans claim that banning or restricting social media access is necessary to c...

frontiersin.org