Nathaniel Geiger

@nathanielgeiger.bsky.social

Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan. Social psychology and climate change communication. Speaking for myself, not the university. https://nathanielgeiger.wixsite.com/michigan

Maybe we need a follow-up to this article that studies whether political pundits also underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans? www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... @arpearson.bsky.social

Bild
Matt Huber@matthuber.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Hello, it’s me in @nytopinion.nytimes.com The Democratic Party is historically unpopular & hemorrhaging working class voters. Focusing on the issue of climate change —an issue mainly impt to their educated/affluent base—is not a way to reverse this. This marks the end of an era. 👇

This is a great data visualisation. It clearly shows why policy interventions that support/subsidise driving tend to not just miss an opportunity to reduce inequality, they are likely to entrench inequality, because those in the most deprived areas will derive the least benefit.

Jo Wood@jwolondon.bsky.social · 4mo ago

As @ianwalker.bsky.social mentions in the video, richer → more driving. The census records the number of cars/vans every household has access to, which we can split by deprivation 'decile'. Consistently, the more deprived an area is, the less household access to private vehicles. [2/8]

0 vertically stacked bars arranged from left to right. Each bar is divided into 4, ranging from pale orange at the bottom to dark orange at the top. The proportion of each bar that is in the darker shades decreases from left to right. The bars are labelled at the bottom with 'less deprived' on the left 'deciles' in the middle with arrows pointing left and right, and 'more deprived on the right'. The four shades of orange a labelled on the right with the darkest orange representing 'three or more cars', the medium orange labelled 'two cars', the lighter orange 'one car' and the lightest orange 'no car access'. At the very bottom is the attribution "Source: ONS 2021 Census (English LSOAs only)".

Survey research is often interpreted as showing that belief in conspiracy theories can be surprisingly widespread, including belief in conspiracy theories that would be astonishing if true. For example, in The Atlantic we learn that “12 million Americans believe lizard people run our country”

Bild

Wow, and wow again. Clean energy candidates have beaten a concerted campaign by Turning Point USA and captured a board majority at the Salt River Project, Arizona's 2nd-largest utility Lots of us pitched in on this fight, not knowing if a win was possible. It was! www.ariseia.org/news/clean-e...

Clean Energy Candidates Win Majority in SRP Election, Delivering Historic Rejection of Partisan Influence

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Phoenix, Arizona — [April 8, 2026] — Clean energy candidates secured a decisive 8–6 majority on the Salt River Project (SRP) Board of Directors following a historic...

ariseia.org

This post is part of a longer thread and we really wanted to make sure it got attention from our community. Many thank you's to Paige Amormino (@amormino.bsky.social) for putting together this action guide to help scholars advocate for the Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences!

Society for Personality and Social Psychology@spspnews.bsky.social · 4mo ago

We encourage SPSP members to check out an excellent guide prepared by Paige Amormino (@amormino.bsky.social), which offers practical action steps that members can take to speak up for personality and social psychology research: ow.ly/zYBl50YEuVM

A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right. Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement. This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.

The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
• Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

Bari’s sole, career-defining trick is to repackage bog-standard elite opinion as something “edgy” and “heterodox.” There is an audience for that product, and the audience has a lot of spare cash. (You will never go broke telling rich people what they want to hear.) But it’s a NICHE audience.

Journalists often go on hand-fed ride-alongs with agents. Seldom, though, do they get into the cars of everyday people protecting their communities from those same agents. We just did exactly that, in ICE-occupied Minneapolis: