2026 is not only the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, it’s also 250 years since the death of David Hume on August 25, 1776. On ux-phi, now you can play David Hume’s favorite card game, Whist, with him, Adam Smith and Adam Ferguson: www.ux-phi.com/invite/HUMEW...
Nat Hansen
@nathansen.bsky.social
Philosopher at the University of Reading (UK) working on new wave ordinary language philosophy, experimental semantics and pragmatics, and some aesthetics. I'm building playable simulations of historical philosophical scenes at ux-phi.com.
A new way of interacting with the philosopher personas of J.L. Austin, Iris Murdoch, G.E.M. Anscombe, and R.M. Hare is now up at ux-phi: The Oxford tutorial. Try it out here: www.ux-phi.com/class/TUTORI...
I've been quoting the idea from this paper's first para, that Claude prompts like "Report outcomes faithfully” are like what Azande witch-doctors say while stirring medicine: “You medicine which I am cooking, mind you always speak the truth to me. Do not let anyone injure me with his witchcraft..."
Revised! Interactional foundations for critical AI literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Gods speak, spirits speak, computers speak. Oracular ambiguity or statistical probability provides loopholes, and discrepancies are expunged by Faith.” — Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness (1969)
Philosophers, we need your help We are running a study on philosophers’ intuitions about thought experiments moralsciencelab.com/intuitions/ Only takes a few minutes!
Umeå University is advertising two assistant professor positions in the humanities: www.umu.se/en/work-with... I was a postdoc at Umeå and it's a great place to work! @ethannowak.bsky.social would back me up on this.
Two positions as Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities
umu.se
Why do people think there's conceptual inflation when there isn't? We suggest that it is, in part, just due to the diversity in language use. There is an assumption that drives me up the wall behind a lot of these complaints. People seem to think each word can only have this one meaning.
@liao.shen-yi.org and my op-ed version of "Measuring Conceptual Inflation: The Case of 'Racist'" is up at New Work in Philosophy, thanks @marcusarvan.bsky.social! newworkinphilosophy.substack.com/p/measuring-...
@liao.shen-yi.org and my op-ed version of "Measuring Conceptual Inflation: The Case of 'Racist'" is up at New Work in Philosophy, thanks @marcusarvan.bsky.social! newworkinphilosophy.substack.com/p/measuring-...
"Measuring Conceptual Inflation: the Case of ‘Racist'" - Nat Hansen (University of Reading) & Shen-yi Liao (University of Puget Sound)
Ergo, 2026
newworkinphilosophy.substack.com
Philosophy job in beautiful Lund 🇸🇪 lu.varbi.com/en/what:job/... #philjobs
Senior Lecturer in Practical Philosophy
We are seeking a candidate for a full-time permanent position as Senior Lecturer in Practical Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy at Lund University. Workplace and academic environment The Depa
lu.varbi.com
This is the last of the trilogy that @nathansen.bsky.social and I have on conceptual inflation critiques and the word 'racist'. All the articles are open access. Download them all via the following DOIs, nerds! 1. doi.org/10.1017/apa.... 2. doi.org/10.3998/ergo... 3. doi.org/10.7015/JEAS...
Me and @nathansen.bsky.social has a paper called "Conceptual Inflation" that is now officially published by the TWese open access journal EurAmerica*. We do some natural history of critiques in this vicinity (cf. "concept creep"). We disentangle things people might mean by "conceptual inflation".
56-2-2
出刊年月/Date of Publishing 2026.06 所屬卷期/Vol. & No. 第56卷第2期 Vol. 56, No. 2 類型/Type 研究論文 Research Article
euramerica-ch.ea.sinica.edu.tw
I had no idea this existed until now, and thought I had a good education: Mel Brooks' 1963 The Critic (h/t @kellylink.bsky.social ) www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pram...
Mel Brooks - The Critic (1963)
YouTube video by ados4k
youtube.com
This paper is amazing. Highly recommend
After a long time, the work with @nathansen.bsky.social on the ordinary conception of the word 'racist' is officially alive on the internet! Get that beautifully typeset and carefully copyedited pdf—all 44 pages of gloriousness—at Ergo for FREEEEEEEEE! journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article...
This is a big chunky paper! My favorite parts are at the end, when we give our account of why people think "racist" is being conceptually inflated when we haven't found evidence that it is.
After a long time, the work with @nathansen.bsky.social on the ordinary conception of the word 'racist' is officially alive on the internet! Get that beautifully typeset and carefully copyedited pdf—all 44 pages of gloriousness—at Ergo for FREEEEEEEEE! journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article...
Thanks to a suggestion from Ángel Pinillos, I gave the Big Five personality test to some of the philosopher personas that are at the heart of the ux-phi.com simulations: Thrasymachus, Socrates, G.W.F. Hegel, J.L. Austin, G.E.M. Anscombe, and Iris Murdoch.
"High Standards" is advance access in PPR (doi.org/10.1111/phpr...). Argues against the view that 'rational' and (moral) 'good' are maximum-standard gradable adjectives and sketches an alternative view on which these adjectives have non-maximal but normatively demanding standards. 2/3
doi.org
Last week I taught the part of Plato's Phaedrus where Socrates argues speech is superior to writing because writing can't argue back. I think Socrates is half right (Phaedrus's scroll can't argue back) so I made a version of the Phaedrus that *can* argue back: www.ux-phi.com/class/BLUESK...
I'm teaching 1984 and since we already ask our students to submit their work to an automated plagiarism detector, I thought I would make one for thoughtcrime: www.nat-hansen.com/minitrue Paste your work or bio to identify how much crimethink is in it and get a certified thoughtcrime-free version.
Nerds: This is basically an amazing open ended RPG set in important scenes in philosophical history. Pedagogy nerds: This is like Reacting (to the Past) simulations but single player. And philosophy. It’s not generic LLM generated but based on lots of research into academic and popular sources.
I made some playable philosophy simulations: -Oxford 1952 -Republic Book I -Jena 1799 -Paris 1945 www.ux-phi.com
I made some playable philosophy simulations: -Oxford 1952 -Republic Book I -Jena 1799 -Paris 1945 www.ux-phi.com
New! Interactional foundations for critical AI literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Why do Anthropic engineers talk to Claude as a witch-doctor to his potions? How is prompt engineering like spider divination? Can one reason without reasons? ft. Lovelace, Adorno, Suchman, Weizenbaum & many more ☺️
I built a text based simulation of 1952 Oxford where you can argue with Austin, Hare, Strawson, etc. and I'm trying to convince them that they should think about making searchable bodies of ordinary language using the computers that Alan Turing is working on and they're laughing at me:
The next round of Zed and my work on aesthetic judgment and conversation: inspired by Susan Sontag we make the case for "seriousness" in aesthetic judgment and against vibing, communitarianism and the "omnivore monoculture". onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
The Very Idea of Seriousness
What norms govern aesthetic conversations? In Hansen and Adams (2024), we argue for a norm we call, following Stanley Cavell, “the hope of agreement”, along with a requirement of “seriousness”, the “...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
This is just another way of saying that I love mixed methods work, I guess. Archival research? Yes! Data collection? Yes! Quantitative analysis? Yes! Close reading? Yes! Case studies? Yes! Theoretical speculation? Yes! Let’s do it all why not
This looks like a fascinating study both of what gentrification is and also of the stakes of expanding the meaning of political terms!
A provocative account of what is gained & what is lost when a word that once narrowly referred to neighborhood change takes on a life all its own. @jbrownsaracino.bsky.social's The Death and Life of Gentrification is now available (10 March UK pub). Learn more: press.princeton.edu/books/hardco...
This is a fantastic paper!
Elmar Unnsteinsson (@eunnsteins.bsky.social) and I have a new paper forthcoming in Noûs. "Genre and Conversation" We show how to generalize the classic pragmatic theories to conversational genres that aren't factual, cooperative, committal information exchanges. philpapers.org/rec/ELMGAC-2