Nate Charlow

@nchar.bsky.social

Toronto philosophy professor, dad. natecharlow.com

The political press very clearly understands “truth” as a social agreement, a compromise position between everyone important enough to have an opinion. It did not reflect on how this would allow dedicated liars to go all-in on lies again and again and dramatically shift the position.

clever display name lacker@pfish.zone · 8mo ago

my emerging theory is that the political press literally does not believe in objective reality in any meaningful sense. there is only what A says and what B says and how that affects the horse race

It’s so weird that people latched onto a bunch of mostly bullshit justifications for disliking a technology that has immediate obvious negative societal externalities. It’s made it way harder to teach writing but people scream about imaginary lakes evaporating.

Quantian@quantian.bsky.social · last yr.

The commonly cited AI water usage statistics are based on a methodology where, if your data center buys green energy from a hydroelectric dam (as lots do, including the hyperscalers), then “natural evaporation of the water from the lake behind the dam” is counted as that data center’s water use.

i'm getting really into cognitive decoupling (by which i mean psychologically pathologizing my political opponents on the basis of tendentious interpretation of low-quality opinion surveys)