Nick Bednar

@nicholasbednar.bsky.social

McKnight Land-Grant Professor, Law and Political Science at U. of Minnesota. AdLaw, Admin. Capacity, and the Federal Workforce. Contributing Editor for Lawfare; Nonresident Fellow at Brookings. Signal: Nbednar.46 Opinions are my own; Not UMN.

Federal employees are suing OPM over the removal of gender-affirming care coverage from federal health plans, arguing the policy is unlawful. The case could affect thousands across the federal workforce. By Erich Wagner

LGBTQ+ feds sue to restore FEHB coverage of gender affirming care

A class action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s campaign to block gender affirming care coverage under federal agencies’ employer-sponsored health insurance program said the move is…

buff.ly

The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau and other federal statistical agencies are feeling the effects of deep staffing losses. Experts say the hardest thing to replace may be the experience walking out the door. Jory Heckman reports:

Staffing cuts are leaving federal statistical agencies stretched thin

The Bureau of Labor Statistics and Census Bureau have been hard hit by staffing cuts, and experts say replacing lost expertise won't happen overnight.

buff.ly

Over at @lawfaremedia.org, Peyton Baker, Amy Wildermuth, and I discuss the recent decision in Comans v. Executive Office of the President and what it reveals about the questions emerging in the Post-Slaughter world.

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 6d ago

In Comans v. Executive Office of the President, a district court applied Slaughter, the Supreme Court's ruling letting the president remove 'subordinates.' Peyton Baker, @nicholasbednar.bsky.social, and Amy Wildermuth break down the decision, which upheld removal protections for inferior officers.

In Comans v. Executive Office of the President, a district court applied Slaughter, the Supreme Court's ruling letting the president remove 'subordinates.' Peyton Baker, @nicholasbednar.bsky.social, and Amy Wildermuth break down the decision, which upheld removal protections for inferior officers.

Inferior Officers Protections Post-Slaughter

A district court judge has affirmed removal protections for inferior officers in the first case to consider the question post-Slaughter.

lawfaremedia.org

My letter to the WA Supreme Ct earlier this evening urging diploma privilege as a remedy for the disastrous failed attempt at administering the July 2026 WA Bar Exam, and its unwise postponement to September. No altogether good options, but equity and fairness require diploma privilege for the… 1/2

BildBildBild

New draft paper on SSRN: "Fact Avoidance," forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Supreme Court Issue. This Essay identifies a recurring feature where the Court decides presidential power cases entirely on legal grounds without engaging at all with the facts /1 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Fact Avoidance

<p><i><span>The legality of the President’s exercise of statutory power depends on questions of both law and fact. Yet courts often focus exclusively on the for

papers.ssrn.com

The fight over who sits on the USPS Board of Governors may be about more than the #Postal Service. Experts say the nominations could preview what's ahead for bipartisan boards across government. Reporting by Jory Heckman and Erich Wagner:

USPS nominations test the future of bipartisan boards

Federal law requires that no more than five members of USPS’ Board of Governors be from the same political party. The Trump administration has only submitted Republican nominees so far.

buff.ly

idk but i saw this cartoon in the new yorker today and i was like oh that’s perfect for nick bednar’s entire state of being during Trump II send up the bednar signal!!🦇

cartoon of batman in bed looking at his laptop with the bat signal on display out the window. he’s on the phone saying “yeah, i see it. i’m on my way as we speak.”