Jared Hutchins

@pablohutch.bsky.social

Assistant professor in Agricultural Economics at University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Research interests: agriculture/livestock/productivity/institutions/economic history/data viz

Shout out to TexRail. I’m in Fort Worth for a conference and I almost took a 60 dollar Uber to sit in DFW traffic, instead of this lovely train that picks up in the airport and goes downtown for 2 DOLLARS.

Picture of my TexRail ticket (2 DOLLARS) out the window from my seat (which has a table)

Another note on something students mostly wont condemn: the Renewable Fuel Standard. Just graded their midterms where they were asked to evaluate the effect of taking away RFS, and most of the answers were "yes this hurts the environment, but it helps farmers and gas prices so it should stay."

Jared Hutchins@pablohutch.bsky.social · 5mo ago

I teach an undergraduate course on agricultural and food policy. In recent years, their assignment has been assessing the impacts of work requirements on employment. What is a bsolutely fascinating: a certain portion STILL support work requirements, even when they see research like this. Why? ...

I teach an undergraduate course on agricultural and food policy. In recent years, their assignment has been assessing the impacts of work requirements on employment. What is a bsolutely fascinating: a certain portion STILL support work requirements, even when they see research like this. Why? ...

Chloe N East (she/her)@chloeneast.bsky.social · 5mo ago

The “big beautiful bill” greatly expanded SNAP work requirements for parents In my paper with @jasonbcook.bsky.social, forthcoming at JPUBE, we ask what similar, existing requirements do SNAP work requirements for parents deny vulnerable parents SNAP benefits and do not increase their employment

Respectfully disagree with some of the points here. I think LLMs are going to be in research, but they have some real downsides (currently). 1) Data privacy is a real impediment. I simply cannot feed an LLM proprietary data to ask for help, would def breach many data sharing agreements.

Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham@paulgp.com · 5mo ago

My attempt at articulating why I think LLMs are a clear net positive for all research, and it's a mistake to ignore it despite private concerns: paulgp.com/2026/03/16/r...

Today I am publishing what I believe to be the most detailed available map of Trump's job approval rating. Powered by over 12,000 interviews for our Strength In Numbers/Verasight poll. I hope this generates many stories, and hours wasted exploring data! www.gelliottmorris.com/p/a-very-det...

A very detailed map of Trump's job approval

Explore our new interactive map of Trump's job approval, powered by 12,000 survey interviews conducted in 2025 and 2026

gelliottmorris.com

my Blackest opinion is that the presumption of conflict between "America has a long and deeply rooted history of violence" and "we can and should fight against today's version of that, as did those who came before us" is less a philosophical debate about how to treat the past and more a skill issue

"Made in China" has been synonymous with "cheap crap." But that's changing, especially in solar, batteries and consumer electronics, where they lead the world. This report from a trade show found Chinese companies were "light-years ahead" of US companies. www.pcmag.com/opinions/chi...

I Came to CES to Check Out Energy and Solar Power Innovations and Found That China Is Running Laps Around Us

In Las Vegas, I saw a tale of two nations’ energy priorities. The US needs to get its act together.

pcmag.com

This is a point the “AI inevitability” folks simply do not engage convincingly—We would not accept this technological caveat in any other context “Our machine lets everyone make their own custom pharmaceuticals—but now every drug everywhere is maybe poison—better do your research!” Yeah no thanks

Dr. Casey Fiesler@cfiesler.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Here's the reality this example illustrates: It's not even just about people blindly trusting what ChatGPT tells them. LLMs are poisoning the entire information ecosystem. You can't even necessarily trust that the citations in a published paper are real (or a search engine's descriptions of them).

The glyphosate debate has been a disaster from the jump. This isn't the first time Monsanto meddled with the research when they were supposed to be hands-off. But the association with GMOs meant many people *really* wanted glyphosate to be bad, so there's lots of crap research on that side too.

𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝙲. 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚗@charlescmann.bsky.social · 8mo ago

The entire glyphosate (Roundup herbicide) saga is an appalling example of politicized science and motivated reasoning. Now key anti-Roundup papers AND key pro-Roundup papers have been retracted. Worse, I'd be willing to take odds that partisans of both sides will be completely unbothered by this.

seems like as good a time as any to remind y'all of the work we did showing that the rollout of GM soy (which tolerates glyphosate application->brought an increase in agrotoxin application) is associated with increased child leukemia mortality www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1...

Agricultural intensification and childhood cancer in Brazil | PNAS

Over the last several decades, Brazil has become both the world’s leading soy producer and the world’s leading consumer of hazardous pesticides. De...

pnas.org

Parents For Future #EndFossilFuels 🪧🛢️❌@parentsforfuture.de · 8mo ago

#Oops: The seminal paper that has been used for 25 years to justify that the use of #Glyphosate is safe has been retracted. ▶️ www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... "Concerns were raised regarding the authorship of this paper, validity of the research findings…"

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
ELSEVIER Volume 31, Issue 2, April 2000, Pages 117-165

RETRACTED: Safety Evaluation and Risk
Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and
Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for
Humans

Gary M. Williams 9 Robert Kroes °, Ian C. Munro © 2

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal

#EconSky I am trying to send out a survey to several farms and I need to validate the addresses I received (from state govt) with the USPS database (to make sure they are deliverable). Google Maps does not validate, just checks if it looks like address. Anyone have a way that they've done this?