@pentathlos.bsky.social

Academic librarian, but expect re/posting on many different things. (We all have a past.) Professional interests: scholarly comms, library systems, and the future of libraries in higher education.

"amends state laws by including librarians...among those who can be criminally charged for distributing or providing materials deemed “harmful to minors.” The law...fails to define what constitutes “obscene” or “inappropriate.” " bookriot.com/arkansas-act...

Librarians and Booksellers Will Be Arrested For Doing Their Jobs in Arkansas

A Federal Judge has allowed an Arkansas law to go into effect that will lead to widespread book bans and jail time for librarians.

bookriot.com

I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful

An aircraft passenger oxygen mask: a drop down passenger mask with air bag and yellow plastic mouth and nose cover, oxygen tube has been cut; Demonstration model used by flight attendant crew for passenger instruction. Has text on the side indicating that it's non-functional.

A brief update on the status of the Trove Data Guide: https://updates.timsherratt.org/2026/07/28/trove-data-guide-status.html #GLAM #digitalHumanities

The Trove Data Guide was released in June 2024, but I always imagined it as a living resource that would continue to expand and develop. I was working on new sections about maps and images when, in February 2025, the NLA cancelled my API access and work ground to a halt. I haven’t been able to make any significant updates since then. The Trove Data Guide is built using Jupyter Book and the contents are contained in Jupyter notebooks. These notebooks embed many calls to the Trove API which render as tables and visualisations when a new version of the Guide is built. Without an API key the build process fails. In addition, the ‘overview’ sections often make use of pre-prepared data harvests which I now can’t update. And, of course, without an API key I can’t maintain or develop any of the tools or code examples that underpin the Guide. The only way I can change the content of the Guide is by editing the static HTML produced by the last build process, but that’s of limited usefulness and not very sustainable. That said, there’s still a lot of useful content in the Trove Data Guide. As the ‘Who is this for?' section says: > The Trove Data Guide aims to help researchers understand, access, and use data from Trove. But just because it’s about ‘data’ doesn’t mean you need to be able to code. To understand Trove data and its possibilities for research, you first need to understand Trove itself – its history, its structure, its assumptions, and its limits. This knowledge is useful to any Trove user. > > For example, all Trove users would benefit from knowing more about works and versions, or how to use the ‘simple’ search box for complex queries. There’s also an introduction to what’s in (and not in) the digitised newspapers, and similar overviews for other digitised content such as books, parliamentary papers, and oral histories. Most of this documentation isn’t available through Trove’s own help system. I’ve just moved the Guide to a new server and made some minor updates. I’ve added a warning on the home page about the restrictions that the NLA imposed on data access last year. Because of these new limits on API use, researchers might need to negotiate an exemption to the terms of use before making use of the tools and examples in the Guide. I’ve also added a note to the ‘About’ page explaining the lack of updates. I’m not hopeful that the gatekeepers at the NLA will change their attitude. However, there is one way that the Trove Data Guide can remain a living resource. The Guide embeds support for Hypothes.is, a web annotation tool. If you set up a free account in Hypothes.is, you can highlight any of the text in the Guide and add your own comments. If these annotations are set to ‘public’ they’ll be visible to all users. So feel free to make corrections or additions and help keep the content up-to-date! I’m also planning to copy some of the non-API content into a new resource focused more broadly on online resources for research in Australian history. I have a domain name, but nothing else as yet! If you’re interested let me know and that might prompt me to get moving.

updates.timsherratt.org

When does the Top 100 Australian Books campaign run? Monday, 31 August — voting opens at 8am (so be prepared!) Thursday, 1 October — voting closes at 11.59pm Saturday, 17 and Sunday, 18 October — tune in to ABC Radio National for countdown weekend! www.abc.net.au/listen/radio...

ABC Radio National’s Top 100 Australian Books Countdown - ABC Radio National

Top 100 Books is Radio National's annual countdown where we hand over the reins to you. You vote for your favourite books, then we take over Radio National for a weekend to count them down.

abc.net.au

A remarkable shift since the frosty and sceptical reception that @theblochian.bsky.social and I received, when we spoke to CUP about the need for OA in 2013.

Danny Kingsley@dannykay68.bsky.social · 2w ago

KEEP GOING!! www.cambridge.org/news-and-ins... "Cambridge University Press has reached a significant milestone in its transition to open access (OA), with 75 percent of its research articles to be published OA in 2026 and 50 percent of its journals now fully open."

"It is easy to point fingers, [but] it has become exceedingly difficult to find willing reviewers for the ever-increasing number of papers that are prima facie worthy of peer review, and those reviewers are still expected to work pro bono, because publishers don’t wish to pay for their services."

A Scene from the AI Flooding of Academic Journals - Daily Nous

"We recently received a double-digit number of submissions from authors in the Far East... where we had strong evidence of machine generated content. Nothing made much sense in these papers, the autho...

dailynous.com

Not a lot of info here about what kinds of agreements, with whom, and finances. But another example of data opening up for “AI” that wasn’t open for researchers. I fought many data wrangling battles at Semantic Scholar over missing ACM data. All research papers should be open access!

Association for Computing Machinery@acm.org · 3w ago

We are opening a consultation on the inclusion of ACM publications within AI licensing agreements for access and training purposes. We have published this piece as to why we believe it is the right time now to enter into these discussions. buff.ly/VTatuda

"The propagation of AI slop [...] is making science less trustworthy. But in parallel, AI enthusiasts are telling the world that the remedies should all be easy to automate, creating the impression that journals can not only catch more errors but also do it more efficiently and cheaply."

AI in scientific publishing: Slower, worse, and more expensive

There’s a saying in the management world, popularized by NASA administrator Daniel Goldin in the 1990s, that the goal of technological improvements is to make products faster, better, and cheaper. Alt...

science.org

You might be wondering how this decline in the number of people entering academic disciplines in the humanities affects something like a project devoted to researching, writing, and publishing histories of place (or local histories)? These early career researchers are essential to our work. 🗃️ 1/5

Hetan Shah@hetanshah.bsky.social · 3w ago

In perhaps our most devastating briefing we find early career staff in the humanities as a whole have declined by 20% since 2016/17. Between 23/24 and 24/25 early career staff across all SHAPE subject areas fell by 6%, (from 52,795 to 49,410 FPE). That is the pipeline for our disciplines

The British Academy
Mapping SHAPE academic staff briefing:
Pathways for early career
SHAPE
academics are in decline

SCOTUS’ unanimous decision shielding ISPs from liability for their subscribers' copyright infringement established a clean legal test that will likely influence the wave of AI copyright litigation now working through the courts, EFF’s Corynne McSherry told @broadbandbreakfast.bsky.social.

Supreme Court's Cox Ruling Reshapes Copyright Fight, With AI Cases Next in Line

The high court's 9-0 Cox v. Sony ruling hands AI developers a ready-made defense against claims that their models are built for infringement.

broadbandbreakfast.com