Magnus Johansson

@pgmj.bsky.social

PhD & lic. psychologist. Research specialist at Karolinska Institutet @ki.se . R packages for Rasch psychometrics: pgmj.github.io/easyRasch2 (also for jamovi) and easyRaschBayes. #openscience, #psychometrics, #rstats, #photo

I'm so happy to announce version 2.0.0 of my #Rstats package WeightIt is out on CRAN! New features: censoring weights, multilevel propensity scores, improved weights for continuous treatments, bias-reduced ordinal and multinomial models, M-estimation in subgroups Check out the website below!

Weighting for Covariate Balance in Observational Studies

Generates balancing weights for causal effect estimation in observational studies with binary, multi-category, or continuous point or longitudinal treatments by easing and extending the functionality ...

ngreifer.github.io

‘Polarization’ has become the master concept for diagnosing our current democratic crisis. But this is not polarization. It is the radicalization of the political right. By misdiagnosing it, we risk becoming complicit in the crisis. 🧵 Just out in Perspectives on Politics doi.org/10.1017/S153...

Bild

We are excited to relaunch our Drawdown Learn program, offering free online courses designed for climate professionals and lay audiences. Currently, we have 3 courses in production: - Living on Planet Earth - Getting Started with Climate Solutions - Exploring Food & Climate Solutions

Bild

Another example of how useful {geomtextpath} can be, imho. This is from the item category probability plot in my {easyRasch2} package. Most psychometric papers within the factor analytic tradition seem to disregard evaluating how the response scale works, which I find difficult to understand.

Bild

I tried to update a preprint at OSF.io 2 weeks ago, but at the last step I realized I needed to make an edit and pressed cancel. Then the preprint was deleted from OSF. Support quickly responded that this is a known bug and they will restore the preprint, but this has yet to happen :(

If you would have also said yes, then there is something missing in your understanding of causal inference. RCTs *do not* provide information about what would have happened to a person if they had received the treatment. They provide information about average *group-level* differences.

#psych content journals need sections for pure methods papers. Methods papers are put in methods journals read by methods people. But non-methods folk don't read those journals, so they miss the methodological insights/updates. Where are the content journals that eagerly publish methods papers?

"The editorial team’s resignation follows ongoing concerns about Springer Nature putting pressure on editors to accept and publish more articles. Commercial publishers like Springer Nature are increasingly using this tactic to grow the revenue they receive for open access publishing via APCs."

New Open Access Journal to Launch Following Resignation of Editorial Team from <em>Natural Language Semantics</em>

The Open Library of Humanities is pleased to announce the launch of a new diamond open access journal in linguistics, following the resignation of the editorial team of Natural Language …

openlibhums.org

I wish I could write like this. And I wish Lindy West wrote tutorial papers in psychometrics. (Source: Lindy West, 2019 essay collection 'The Witches Are Coming')

Bild

The methods section is the most important section of a paper. Without knowing the methods, the results are literally meaningless. So it's not OK to relegate the methods to the end. Because this suggests they are an optional afterthought rather than the essential core of the entire paper.

Dan Quintana@dsquintana.bsky.social · 2mo ago

As long as a paper's methods are described *somewhere* I don't think it matters where they are located in a manuscript

Meme using Norman Rockwell's painting "Freedom of Speech" (1943), showing a working-class man standing up to speak at a town meeting while suited men around him look on. Text reads: "IT IS OK TO HAVE METHODS AT THE END OF A MANUSCRIPT / THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT METHODS ARE LESS IMPORTANT"

Is it just me, or are Zenodo DOI links (for GitHub README markdown files) broken? I just get a broken link symbol, even for repos that used to work. If I use the image link separately, it renders fine in the browser. Example repo: github.com/pgmj/easyRas...

GitHub - pgmj/easyRasch2jmv: A Jamovi module of R package easyRasch2

A Jamovi module of R package easyRasch2. Contribute to pgmj/easyRasch2jmv development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com