Peter Piazza

@piazza4malden6.bsky.social

Professor at Stonehill. Malden School Committee Rep. Dad to 2 wild animals.

Hi everyone! Got a community event we're really excited about. Cafe Reynard will be hosting a T4T Clothing Swap at the cafe on Thursday June 4th. Bring your old clothes and get some new ones! Open to all, totally free ❤️

First annual pride month clothing swap! Thursday June 4th 8:00 to 2:00

Uhh @bostonglobe.com whut is this line? "A major difference between the Brown v. Board of Education era and today is there is no evidence the current segregation is motivated by racism or discrimination. Poverty and geography are now the driving forces." www.bostonglobe.com/2026/05/21/o...

A new lawsuit forces the state to confront racial segregation in schools - The Boston Globe

Because school assignments are largely based on ZIP code, the state’s schools reflect the state’s racial segregation. But separate is not equal.

bostonglobe.com

New paper w/ @ashleyjcarey.bsky.social looks at how non-binary students are erased in state data sets. Basic arg is: When we have better data, we are better able to see students who are otherwise erased in the binary. We can also work to make things better for them. epaa.asu.edu/index.php/ep...

Erased from the permanent record: Data collection practices and non-binary student experiences in school | Education Policy Analysis Archives

epaa.asu.edu

“Well before Kristi Noem announced DHS operations in Minnesota, the neighborhood got ready. It started with rapid response preparation in the park’s recreation center and legal observer trainings at a church. Small networks that formed in 2020 were reactivated.” www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/...

ICE vs. Everyone | Erin West

What we’re doing now is this: The trainings have evolved into street medic workshops on protecting yourself from chemical weapons and lessons on digital security; there’s a meet-up to sew reinforced u...

nplusonemag.com

...deference than Chevron deference, but it isn't the total absence of deference. Also, HUD purports to justify only allowing 30 days for public comment on the grounds that many comments have been submitted in past comment processes for the same overarching issue. One could easily argue... 11/

What else of note is going on here? Well, HUD claims that agency interpretations of statutes are entitled to no deferential weight after the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright. That's just wrong. Loper Bright reinforced the existence of Skidmore deference. That's a lesser form of... 10/

...how HUD will apply the Act when it is exercising its statutorily mandated enforcement role. Of course, civil rights and housing justice advocates have ample reason to be concerned that HUD will act lawlessly, if it even bothers to accept jurisdiction over disparate impact complaints. 9/

...it is the role of the courts to interpret statutes, but that doesn't answer for how HUD will interpret and apply the Act in its own administrative enforcement proceedings. The field is left with - or will be left with if the proposed rule is finalized and takes effect - uncertainty about... 8/

...the standard rather than it being its role. The Department is seemingly aware that it is constrained from following in the CFPB's footsteps in light of a 2015 Supreme Court decision holding that the Fair Housing Act allows for disparate impact claims. At the same time, it isn't bucking the... 6/

In a proposed rule published in November, the CFPB articulated the position (contrary to mountains of legislative history) that ECOA did not allow for disparate impact claims. The position HUD is staking out here is essentially a dodge. The Department is saying it is the courts' role to set... 5/

It would have maintained the pretense that the disparate impact framework endured while making it functionally impossible for a plaintiff or complaint to ever prevail. Also, HUD isn't taking the route taken by the CFPB with respect to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. 4/