Tessera
Folgen

🔞Robb Pepperwolfe🔞

@robbpepperwolfe.bsky.social

Greater Metro Detroit area junkyard doggo. Co-owner of The Party Crew LVL 37. Pro lgbtq+, kink friendly Melomaniac

1099 Posts313 Follower532 Folgt
🔞Robb Pepperwolfe🔞@robbpepperwolfe.bsky.social · 3d ago

WHAT. THE. FUCK. Ai generated child porn is legal but heavens fucking forbid if you het caught selling furry art on the banking apps. This country is cooked.

Sapling 🌱@sacredsapling.bsky.social · 4d ago

Woke up to this news and I’m beyond disgusted. It’s a US *constitutional right* now to create and own ‘CSAM,’ as long as it was made with AI?? AI gen images are built from real images, of real children. This directly re-exploits every single CSAM survivor. (More in 🧵) #abolition #trafficking

A federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess child sexual abuse content created using Al if it does not depict a real person and remains in the home. On Tuesday, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th District ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. In his ruling, Judge Lee urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue of virtual abuse material of children in the age of Al, suggesting that technological advances complicate existing legal precedent. The case Lee ruled on came about in 2024 when the Department of Justice brought charges against Steven Anderegg, alleging that he used Al to create thousands of explicit images of children. He was accused of breaking federal obscenity laws by producing, distributing and possessing obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Anderegg sought to have the possession and production charges dismissed under the First Amendment. Last year, a judge in the Western District of Wisconsin agreed to dismiss the possession charge, prompting the federal prosecutors to appeal. Lee, in his ruling upholding the lower court's decision, cited the precedent set by Supreme Court rulings from 1969 and 2002. One held that individuals have a right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home. The other found that "virtual" child sexual abuse material, not depicting a real person is not child pornography.
🔞Robb Pepperwolfe🔞@robbpepperwolfe.bsky.social · 4w ago

Idk man. Local meet is up to something sketchy but i got no proof. Only a strong gut feeling and those aren't usually wrong. Og host had gotten into enough trouble to be forced to step down as host. Now the local event channel is show this guy as a host again. CONTINUED👇

🔞Robb Pepperwolfe🔞@robbpepperwolfe.bsky.social · last mo.

Local bowl meet making it seem like something horid happened at the other bowl meet. (Chris boden visited) But we're just not gonna talk about the local bowl meet not doing anything about registered sex offenders at the meet or how someone had to email the bowling alley directly to get them removed