Dr. Sara B. Chadwick

@sarabchadwick.bsky.social

Assistant Prof of Gender & Women’s Studies & Psychology | UW-Madison | Research on coercion, sexuality/orgasm, gender/LGBTQ, sexual health | (she/her) 🌈

You know what’s not great for women’s sexual desire? When men partners pressure them to have sex! Surprisingly, there’s been very little research on this association. UNTIL NOW! 😉 Excited to announce our new open access article on sexual coercion & desire, published in Sex Roles! rdcu.be/fxXCV

Picture of the paper’s abstract, which can be read in full by following the link.

News outlets have reported over the past year that the U.S. birth rate has hit an all-time low. However, there are different ways to measure fertility, and some of these methods tell a different story.

image comparing three charts mapping the fertility in the U.S. according to three different measures using data from 1974 to 2024. 

Text reads: U.S. fertility hit an all-time low in 2024, according to 2 of 3 measures. 
General fertility rate, number of births per 1,000 women ages 15-44
Total fertility rate, Hypothetical children ever born based on current rates
Children ever born, on average, among women ages 40-44.

We made an open repository of close relationships measures. Our goal is to catalogue all of the published self-report measures in relationship science. You can help us expand the database by suggesting measures you tend to use in your research, or by uploading your own measures! relascale.com

RelaScale - Psychological Measures and Constructs

RelaScale is a searchable database of psychological measures and constructs for relationship researchers.

relascale.com

Now out in Behavior Genetics: I track how fringe researchers weaponize preprint servers to disseminate pseudoscientific studies that advance scientific racism and eugenics links.springernature.com/f/a/Y0XN-XcL...

The Preprint Problem: Fringe, Genetically Informed Studies of Group Differences in Behavior Housed on Open Science Platforms - Behavior Genetics

Preprint servers and open science platforms have revolutionized the scientific process. A fundamental feature of these platforms is a lack of peer review—virtually anyone with an internet connection can upload their research in a few clicks. Although this setup has facilitated rapid dissemination of results and open access to research, it has also enabled fringe researchers to post and share pseudoscientific, genetically informed studies of differences in behavior that often advance racial hereditarian and eugenic claims. Because preprint archives are now routinely used by mainstream academics, preprints grant a degree of legitimacy to fringe research that otherwise may have been relegated to a blog post or fringe publication. Previous studies have documented individual examples of pseudoscientific, genetic studies of group differences being posted on preprint archives, but the scope of this problem remains unclear, making it difficult to formulate responses and potential solutions. The present study quantified and characterized pseudoscientific studies of group differences in behavior—including studies that used genetic methods—housed on popular preprint servers and open science collaboration platforms. Dozens of such preprints were identified. Preprinted studies on group differences often analyzed controversial phenotypes, most frequently intelligence and related traits, and furthered classical, widely rejected hereditarian and eugenic theories. Genetically informed analyses rested on fundamentally flawed assumptions about heritability and polygenic scores. The Preprint Problem is indicative of a broader effort to weaponize mainstream academic research and its mechanisms, including Open Science, and a recent resurgence of scientific racism and eugenics. Potential responses to these challenges are introduced.

links.springernature.com

Trevor Project released its annual LGBTQ youth mental health report. The results are shocking. 40% of trans youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year. Trans youth who wanted hormones but couldn’t access them were nearly twice as likely to attempt suicide than those who could.

Key findings from The 2025 U.S. National Survey on the Mental Health of LGBTQ+ Young People include:

36% of LGBTQ+ young people seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year, including 40% of transgender and nonbinary young people. 
1 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people attempted suicide in the past year.
44% of LGBTQ+ young people who wanted mental health care in the past year were not able to get it.
90% of LGBTQ+ young people said recent anti-LGBTQ+ laws, policies and debates caused them stress or anxiety.
LGBTQ+ young people of color attempted suicide at higher rates than their White peers, and nearly a third (32%) also experienced racial or ethnic discrimination, in addition to anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination.
Transgender and nonbinary young people who wanted hormones but couldn’t access them were nearly twice as likely to attempt suicide than those who could.
Over half (59%) of LGBTQ+ young people ages 13-17 experienced bullying in the past year, and those who did reported significantly higher rates of attempting suicide in the past year than their peers.
LGBTQ+ young people who reported living in very accepting communities attempted suicide at less than a third of the rate of those who reported living in very unaccepting communities.

Are we still posting our raw datasets now that they're being farmed for genAI-written papers? I'm starting to feel differently now sharing data before I'm totally done with my own research questions...

For the first time in over a month I had about an hour yesterday to do a little research - in this case some reading to complement archival work I've started. This quote from an early edition of Our Bodies Ourselves, on disrupting sexual shame, got to me (from Adams 2019 Peitho): 1/4

Picture a woman trying to do work and to enter into equal and satisfying relationships with other people—when she feels physically weak because she has never tried to be strong; when she drains her energy trying to change her face, her figure, her hair, her smells, to match some
ideal norm set by magazines, movies, and TV; when she feels confused and ashamed of the menstrual blood that every month appears from some dark place in her body; when her internal body processes are a mystery to her and surface only to cause her trouble (an unplanned
pregnancy, or cervical cancer); when she does not understand nor enjoy sex and concentrates her sexual drives into aimless romantic fantasies, perverting and misusing a potential energy because she has been brought up to deny it. (Preface to Our Bodies, Ourselves 1973; emphasis added)

Big congrats to my undergrad student, Alethea Quick, who completed a senior honors thesis analyzing our US nationally representative data on orgasm coercion. 91.4% of participants had ever experienced some form of orgasm coercion & we didn’t really see sig differences by various identity groups. 🤯

Bild

It’s true: not all men use sexual force. But 95.1% of men in a recent, anonymous survey of men between the ages of 18 and 34 reported having recently used at least one strategy to get a woman to have sex who they knew did not want sex and had not consented. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

I’m also growing increasingly concerned about pre-prints - the theory & motivations behind them are well-intended, but I’ve already seen news sites (& now this suggests AI) report on pre-prints as though they are full-fledged scientific publications.

Gordon Hodson@gordonhodsonphd.bsky.social · 4mo ago

#AcademicSky I hold a minority position: being concerned about pre-print papers on servers. My concern? Widely available "evidence" that's not peer reviewed. Now AI is here, the threat is clear. You can flood servers w rubbish, AI will amplify the nonsense. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

A positive development in the world of sex ed is that 5 states added a requirement to teach about sexual consent last year. However, that only brings the total number to 16. In 2026, the vast majority of states still don't require consent instruction. www.sexandpsychology.com/blog/2026/4/...

2026 Sexual Education Curriculum Requirements In The US - Sex and Psychology

A look at the state of sex education in the United States in 2026.

sexandpsychology.com

New research suggests that the reason women tend to report less sexual desire than men may not be due to biological differences, but early negative sexual experiences that occur during an important developmental period. https://www.newsweek.com/sex-libido-gap-scientists-study-11612303

Scientists studied why women want less sex than men—they now have an answer

Drawing on evidence from more than 300 scientific studies, researchers have debunked a long-held myth about women's desire.

newsweek.com