Sarah Lang

@sarahalang.bsky.social

Head of Digital Humanities at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Berlin). Previously DH Graz. #Alchemy and early modern history of science & knowledge. #CriticalAI #CriticalDH #DH #ComputationalHumanities https://linktree.sarahalang.com/

For those interested in critical AI literacy, a hopeful thread: This past semester, for their final project, I asked my @uoe-llc.bsky.social Digital Humanities students to make "AI literacy objects" (AILOs): multimedia digital artefacts intended to foster critical literacy around generative AI +

Glitchy image with 'Cream of the Slop' in the center

Working the morning shift as a scholar in 1540, a browser tab and a word document opened on two screens, other needed texts opened and handy, an overfull mail account nearby, and a hot beverage in reach to make for the best working condition. Bonus: wearing a thinking hat. #academicchatter

A man sitting at a working desk, in 1540 setting, with a drinking cup, a few books, a writing desk with paper sheets, and lots of more details.

if any AI bro tries to claim to you (as they very often do generally) that we don't understand these models, remember: they are creating a false narrative even, especially, under scientific meanings of terms like "understanding"

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · 3mo ago

Preprinted! Been working on this for ~1 year w wonderful coauthors Nancy & Mark: > Understanding Artificial Neural Networks: Mysterianism about Known Mechanism is Mysticism doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Have you noticed many experts say they don't understand AI? What's going on? 🤯 Let us tell you... 1/

Understanding Artificial Neural Networks:
Mysterianism about Known Mechanism is Mysticism
Olivia Guest1,2, Nancy Abigail Nuñez Hernández3, and Mark Blokpoel1,2
1Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Radboud University, The Netherlands
2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3Facultad de Estudios Superiores Acatlán-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
Mysterianism is the idea that human cognition, mind, cannot be understood. Taking this
concept and applying it to known mechanism — such that claims are made that we do not
know how engineered systems, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), work, or that they
constitute black boxes that we can only open with difficulty — is inappropriate at best and
malicious at worst. We do know the mechanistic structure of such models because we designed
and built them. We also do know their functional role (what they are for) as well as the
mathematical function they are asked to approximate (map inputs to target outputs). Because
mysterianist beliefs about known systems, such as ANNs, are often expressed, scientists need
to sit up and take notice. We provide an error theory as to what is going on to help unpick
this metatheoretical blunder. Ultimately, the problem is that ‘understanding’ is not a technical
term in these cases: the word is co-opted for a specific narrative to sell ‘artificial intelligence’
through mystification. All computational systems, from pendulums to databases, will behave
in ways we cannot predict or control — this is not a unique property of ANNs — and experts
do indeed grasp the computational properties of these systems nonetheless.
Keywords: artificial neural networks; mechanism; black box; epistemology; artificial
intelligence; understanding

Two new facts stand out: 1. 85% of hallucinated citations in preprints are also in the subsequent journal version (thanks, peer review!) 2. Fake cites more likely to use the names of (male) scholars who are already highly cited, creating a fake-citation Matthew effect. arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723

LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations

Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate plausible but false information across a wide range of contexts, yet the real-world magnitude and consequences of this hallucination problem remain p...

arxiv.org

"Re-focusing on data also means rethinking what counts as meaningful work. Preparing data isn’t just a technical step; it carries so many interpretive choices. It’s where all our beloved hermeneutics live." Such a good rant...er...post by @sarahalang.bsky.social. Well worth your time to read.

Sarah Lang@sarahalang.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Are you also starting to get tired of the constant gesturing that we need better Research/ #AIEthics that doesn’t lead anywhere?😵‍💫 Better data --> better research. Sounds obvious, but that's not where the attention goes. A rant. And some answers ;) latex-ninja.com/2026/05/17/w... #DH

Are you also starting to get tired of the constant gesturing that we need better Research/ #AIEthics that doesn’t lead anywhere?😵‍💫 Better data --> better research. Sounds obvious, but that's not where the attention goes. A rant. And some answers ;) latex-ninja.com/2026/05/17/w... #DH

Why Looking More Closely at Our Data Is the Way to Better Research Ethics

Better data leads to better research. That might sound obvious, but in practice, it’s often not where the attention goes. In conversations about AI, digital humanities, or computational research, t…

latex-ninja.com