💡Job Opening – Director (f/m/x) for the study of international relations at the WZB The WZB seeks to establish a new research department and to fill a permanent full-time position of Director (f/m/x) for the study of international relations, broadly understood. ⤵️🔄 www.wzb.eu/en/jobs/dire...
Scherzinger
@scherzinger.bsky.social
Political Scientist at the @UZH. IR good stuff & quant text analysis. Former Berliner, adopted Zürcher. Website: https://johannesscherzinger.com/
My friend @antonpeez.bsky.social and I wrote a new paper in @the-peio.bsky.social on how to use LLMs to measure revealed preferences in diplo. speeches. We use UN sanctions as a test case to illustrate the approach and offer a template for future IO/IR research. Thread below doi.org/10.1007/s115...
Using LLMs for measurement in diplomatic speeches: The evolving politics of UN sanctions in Security Council debates - The Review of International Organizations
UN sanctions are an important tool for maintaining international peace and have shaped the global security order since the end of the Cold War. However, given contemporary UN Security Council (UNSC) dynamics, new sanctions regimes have become rare, and policymakers are pessimistic about the future of the tool. We evaluate this pessimism by offering a long-term perspective, analyzing all UNSC members’ positions on UN-mandated and unilateral sanctions from 1992 to 2023, introducing the UNSC Sanctions Stance Dataset. We examine 5,984 sanctions-related Council speeches using a large language model for measurement, and validate this procedure with hand coding, descriptive analyses, and expert interviews. Our description of the construction process and guidance on using LLMs for measurement serve as a template for creating LLM-coded and manually and substantively verified datasets from IO speech data. The analysis focuses on Russia, China, and the Global South, and traces their positions in detail. We find that Russia turned from limited support of UN sanctions in the 2000s to total opposition in the mid-2010s, while China has persistently been opposed, offering at most begrudging tolerance. The P3 (France, UK, US) have consistently been supportive. Meanwhile, states from the Global South hold a distinct intermediate position, opposing unilateral sanctions while cautiously but consistently supporting UN-mandated sanctions. This finding cuts against an assumption of Global South opposition to sanctions in general.
doi.org
🚨 New(ish) Publication Alert! Delighted to see my article Credit Claiming in the EU @thejop.bsky.social I explore a classic question for accountability in Europe: when and why do govs claim credit for the work of the EU and shift blame onto Brussels to avoid responsibility? doi.org/10.1086/732970
Credit Claiming in the European Union | The Journal of Politics: Vol 87, No 3
Incumbents in multilevel systems are assumed to exploit uncertainty of responsibility by claiming credit and shifting blame, yet little is known about when and how they engage in these rhetorical stra...
doi.org
UN funding is under pressure. In a new article @the-peio.bsky.social, my colleagues Alex Tokhi and Lisbeth Zimmermann (@goetheuni.bsky.social) show that the participation of far-right parties in government has significant negative effects on the funding of IOs. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
The far right and international organizations: How the far right in government affects foreign aid funding - The Review of International Organizations
The far right is on the rise, winning elections, entering governments globally, and politicizing international cooperation. Existing research finds only very limited effects of far-right governments on international organizations (IOs), however.. We argue that the far right in government undermines IOs by systematically reducing their earmarked funding, as it cannot fully align its anti-migration agenda with the liberal mandates and purposes of most IOs. Using new data on earmarked funding to IOs from 37 OECD donor states between 1990 and 2020, we examine how far-right participation in government affects IO funding. Expanding the data on far-right parties beyond Western Europe, we employ three-way fixed effects and dynamic balancing weights to address both static and dynamic confounding with marginal structural models. Our results show that governments with far-right parties reduce earmarked funding contributions to IOs by almost 30%, without affecting bilateral aid commitments. This suggests that the far right not only politicizes IOs but also attempts to directly undermine their operation when IOs cannot be aligned with their anti-migration agenda.
link.springer.com
DISINTEGRATION data feature #1: A 6-wave EU-wide panel survey (2017–2019) of 10,000+ respondents per wave across all 28 member states. Tracks EU attitudes, Brexit perceptions & political views—country-level analyses possible for FR, DE, IT, PL, ES & UK. doi.org/10.48573/4bj...
DISINTEGRATION: Tracking Europeans' opinions of Brexit and the EU: An EU-wide, six wave cross-sectional survey, 2017–2019
Brexit marked a turning point in EU history. For the first time an EU member state left the EU, leading to concerns about the stability of the EU as a whole. Indeed, Brexit carried significant spillov...
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publ #14: How do international institutions respond to unilateral challenges like non-compliance or withdrawal? @stefwalter.bsky.social & Nicole Plotke-Scherly develop a framework showing how IOs balance cooperation losses vs. contagion risks. doi.org/10.1093/isq/...
Responding to Unilateral Challenges to International Institutions
Abstracts. How do international institutions respond to unilateral challenges by its member states, such as non-compliance, blocking of reforms, renegotiat
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publ #13: IOParlspeech—600k+ parliamentary statements on IOs across 6 countries (1990–2018). @stefwalter.bsky.social & @tommccraehunter.bsky.social show that radical/opposition MPs speak more negatively about IOs, and auhtoritative IOs receive more attention. doi.org/10.1007/s115...
International organizations in national parliamentary debates - The Review of International Organizations
This data article introduces IOParlspeech, an original dataset of over 600,000 statements on international organizations (IOs) in parliamentary debates in six countries between 1990 and 2018. We expla...
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publ #12: When publics grow more Eurosceptic, do parties follow? In FR, IT & UK, mainstream parties adjusted positions but strategically decreased salience of EU issues. Study by @giorgiomalet.bsky.social and Cyrille Thiébaut doi.org/10.1111/1475...
Silent responsiveness: How public opinion affects party discourse on wedge issues
How does public opinion affect political discourse on issues that parties struggle to deal with? Although scholars tend to analyse party–voter linkages in terms of policy positions, parties can respo....
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION #10: How did parties in the EU react to Brexit? Analyzing parliamentary statements, @tommccraehunter.bsky.social finds that after the referendum, Eurosceptic challengers moderated their tone, while mainstream parties ramped up pro-EU rhetoric. No domino effect doi.org/10.1080/1350...
Disintegration and party competition: evidence from parliamentary speeches on Brexit
How do political parties in the European Union (EU) react to disintegration bids from a member state? This question is important, as scholars have argued that framing by elites (particularly Eurosc...
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publ #8 @giorgiomalet.bsky.social and @stefwalter.bsky.social test the “have your cake and eat it, too” argument with voters. Drawing on a panel survey, they show that Brexit had a small but non-negligible impact on Swiss voters’ expectations about EU resolve. doi.org/10.1080/0140...
Have your cake and eat it, too? Switzerland and the feasibility of differentiated integration after Brexit
A key Eurosceptic argument is that countries can selectively retain only those aspects of European integration from which they benefit, while opting out of those aspects they dislike. How convincin...
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publication #5: @stefwalter.bsky.social analyzes how voter-endorsed attempts to withdraw from IOs reverberate abroad. With original survey data from EU-27 Europeans and Swiss voters, she finds both encouragement and deterrence effects. doi.org/10.1177/0010...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
doi.org
DISINTEGRATION publication #4: @stefwalter.bsky.social reviews the globalization backlash. She shows that the backlash is not associated with large swings in public opinion against globalization but is rather a result of its politicization by skeptical actors doi.org/10.1146/annu...
The Backlash Against Globalization | Annual Reviews
In recent years, the world has seen a rising backlash against globalization. This article reviews the nature, causes, and consequences of the globalization backlash. It shows that, contrary to a popul...
doi.org
Today marks the final day of the DISINTEGRATION project, a project on the mass politics of disintegration generously funded by the @erc.europa.eu . We celebrate with a thread on all we have done and found: 1/20
What a pleasure to reflect on the learnings, achievements and ways forward from the DISINTEGRATION project with former and current team members and our wonderful advisory board at Kloster Fischingen. Great presentations, a quiz, beer tasting and many ideas for next steps.
Every once in a while, we write articles we truly care about. This is one of them, and I am so happy and proud to see it published at ISQ:
Responding to Unilateral Challenges to International Institutions
Abstracts. How do international institutions respond to unilateral challenges by its member states, such as non-compliance, blocking of reforms, renegotiat
academic.oup.com
Concluding three inspiring and insightful days of talking research and thinking about EU integration, its boundaries, and integration and disintegration dynamics with a fantastic set of people on Monte Verità.
Today starts the Workshop "The changing boundaries of European integration", co-organized by the DISINTEGRATION (@stefwalter.bsky.social) and EUROBOR (Frank Schimmelfennig) @erc.europa.eu projects and generously co-sponsored by the CSF. We look forward to three insightful days on Monte Verità!
Huge congratulations to @nkortendiek.bsky.social for this well deserved award - Chadwick Alger Prize, the IO Section Best Book Award! 🎉 Buy her book or recommend it to your library! #ISA2025
🏆📖🏅 Congratulations @nkortendiek.bsky.social on winning the @isanet.bsky.social IO section best book award 🏆🫶🏻💕 Read the introduction of „Global Governance on the Ground“ for free: academic.oup.com/book/59022
***GRAPH OF THE MONTH*** Does media-reported EU policy focus shape legitimacy perceptions? Our new study finds that ideological leanings matter: left-wing voters reward EU focus on regulation & climate, while right-wing voters prefer immigration policies.
How should we study party polarization in Europe? Happy to share that our paper on *multidimensional* polarization is now out @bjpols.bsky.social! (more 👇)
NEW - Multidimensional Party Polarization in Europe: Cross-Cutting Divides and Effective Dimensionality - cup.org/4gLJspU - @jellekoedam.bsky.social, Garret Binding & @mrsteenbergen.bsky.social
Thrilled to see my very first publication online! Many thanks to my great friend and co-author @victoraraujo.bsky.social !! journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Distributive politics and asymmetric participation - Philipp Kerler, Victor Araújo, 2025
How do distributive politics affect participation under incomplete information? We theorize a novel mechanism that we call asymmetric participation, which expla...
journals.sagepub.com
"Do external crises unite or divide international organizations? Evidence from 1,443 UNSC resolutions (1995-2018) suggests external crises, like humanitarian disasters, civil conflicts, floods, and terrorist attacks, divide rather than unite the Security Council. Graph by Johannes Scherzinger #UNSC
Graph of the month: Analyzing 167 arguments made in 25 direct democratic voting campaigns on international issues in Switzerland, @giorgiomalet.bsky.social and @stefwalter.bsky.social show that the framing of arguments in favor and against international cooperation differ significantly.
Now published: How do populist-right parties respond when their preferred policies are implemented abroad? Focusing on Brexit, Marco Martini and @stefwalter.bsky.social show that nationalist parties adjusted their aggressiveness towards the EU in line with the ups and downs of the Brexit process.
Very happy to share this new article @gsqjournal.bsky.social! Analyzing the perceptions of IO staff, I show that self-legitimation practices of IO leadership can also backfire and destabilize the organization. Open access here: academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
“Just Theater!”—How Self-Legitimation Practices Can Backfire in International Organizations
Abstract. Working in international organizations (IOs) is not always a pleasure. Contradictory external demands make it difficult to do the right thing, constan
academic.oup.com
Since the mid-2010s, the number of resolutions in the UNSC that have failed or been vetoed has markedly increased, providing another indicator for growing international dissensus amidst a surge of global crises. Data & Visualization by Johannes Scherzinger. #UnitedNations
sciencedirect.com/science/arti... New publication out in Electoral Studies! In this study, I analyze generational voting differences in Western European multiparty systems - focusing on generational realignment *within* political blocs and using individual survey data spanning over 70 years.
Socialized with "old cleavages" or "new dimensions": An Age-Period-Cohort analysis on electoral supp...
Across Western Europe, the electoral base of formerly dominating parties on the left and the right has been eroding in the past decades. In contrast, …
sciencedirect.com
How do leaders from CEE countries present the EU at home? Evidence collected by Tom Hunter from HU and SK leader statements in the aftermath of EU summits.
Two points stand out: 1) Compared to leaders in Western Europe, CEE leaders are more likely to blame the EU, but the dominant rhetorical strategy is still to claim credit 2) Between 2011 and 2018, we observe an increase in the share of statements explicitly blaming the EU.