Scoop McNugget

@scoopmcnugget.bsky.social

Therapist. Former vole wrangler. Bossed by a ridiculous dog. Sometimes I think things. Possibly a little peculiar.

I cannot say this strongly enough: Holding Government to account for overall fiscal responsibility is obviously crucial Farting out “how’s it being funded?” for each and every minor announcement is tedious and immature

Because appointing someone who was fined £100 for not reporting that she found the phone she thought was stolen is so much more serious than choosing as your right hand man someone who was imprisoned after being charged with money laundering, blackmail and extortion.

Bild

So a quick glance at BlueSky this morning tells me that Burnham has treacherously culled all the Starmerites in his new cabinet & also traitorously kept all the Starmerites in his new cabinet. It's a continuity bloodbath. The night of the long spoons.

I’m upset that Mahmood stays in post but I’m not going to write Burnham off entirely based on this one decision. Not today anyway. Starmer outsourced policy entirely to his cabinet & I don’t think that will be Burnham’s style so I’m hoping that we’re going to see a different Mahmood under him???

Starmer has ben in with the king for a while. What if he accepted Starmer’s resignation & then collapsed & died before Burnham arrived? How long before the new PM could be sworn in? Would we be without a PM until William is coronated?

I don’t know what’s going to happen. Burnham could flame out Truss-style in a few weeks. Or he could turn out to be Britain’s most transformative Prime Minister in decades. Most likely: somewhere in between. So ends my analysis.

Karl Turner on LBC stated that Keir Starmer was considered to be very left wing by the Bar. Maybe that's been the problem. Maybe the members of the Bar shouldn't be considered the most reliable judges of where the political centre is?

Farage thinks winning an election in a single, friendly constituency will absolve him of all crimes and misdemeanours. Presumably then, if he loses (to a man with a bin on his head,) we can skip all of the standards and criminal investigations into him and skip straight to sentencing him as guilty?

This point needs to be made over and again: The main purpose of wealth taxes should not be to raise revenue. That's a small and secondary benefit. The main purpose should be to *reduce the fortunes of the ultrarich*. Why? Because those fortunes present a massive threat to democracy and public life.

It's worth stressing that we have rules around political funding to protect our entire democracy. The voters of one constituency might be fine with their MP breaking those rules. But they can't release their MP from them, because a single MP on the take is a danger to the whole system.

Robert Hutton@roberthutton.co.uk · 4w ago

Calling a by-election over the sovereign right of every MP to take secret gifts from a convicted criminal. What a time to be alive.

Trump is like a video game hacker. He gets turned on by the cheating. The point is not just to win but to win by breaking the rules & proving they don’t apply to you. The more egregious & outrageous the hack, the more upset & enraged your opponents, the bigger the win.

Seems the real problem centrist democrats are facing right now is the people are being very clear that they want leaders who will solve their biggest problems, and centrist democrats really don't want to solve their biggest problems and hate the people for wanting that. It's a real pickle for them.

We had a heatwave in the summer of 76 and just got on with it. Back then the sun was known as Ra and his word was gospel. We fired 12 people from each community into the sun to appease him. Only four came back, but they were... different. Hose pipe ban was on. We got by visiting the old haunted well

Bild

I think Starmer genuinely believes that all that matters is delivery & that all this politics stuff is a trivial distraction. The trouble is it turns out that people quite want their politicians to do a bit of politics every now & then.