Alex Sarch

@should-b-workin.bsky.social

Law Prof at University of Surrey School of Law Criminal law, white collar & corporate crime, legal philosophy https://www.surrey.ac.uk/people/alexander-sarch https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=151482

Whenever dealing with hyper-technical UK grade descriptors or academic promotion criteria, I always want to shout Aristotle at them: Precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions people! We must look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits!

Was reminded of Bentham’s argument that fear of crime can be a worse harm than crime itself. Everyone can be affected by fear of crime but relatively few people experience serious crime. And fear of crime can easily be manipulated for nefarious purposes.

Hi Crim Theorists: Great discussion happening rn at PEASoup of Elise Sugarman's fantastic paper in Free & Equal abt correspondence btw mens rea & actus reus--and what it shows abt culpability, diff prosecution strategies & more. (Online debate can be good actually!) peasoupblog.com/2025/08/free...

Free & Equal – Elise Sugarman’s “Supposed Corpses and Correspondence” with a précis from Gabriel Mendlow

PEA Soup is pleased to announce our discussion from Free & Equal, on Elise Sugarman’s “Supposed Corpses and Correspondence” with a précis from Gabriel Mendlow. Critical Précis…

peasoupblog.com

I defy you to name a worse topic for your neighbors at the cafe table next to you to be loudly pontificating about you while you're trying to get work done than the importance of investing in innovation to the future of the company.

Yes the world is nuts right now. Unrelatedly, AI has some very fun uses. Here is Perplexity's pretty great rhyming summary of my lecture handout on fraud under the UK's Fraud Act 2006. Will it help my students remember the elements of s.2 fraud better? Let's find out next term...

Bild

The best solution for nationwide injunctions is for Congress to provide for such requests to be adjudicated by three-judge panels, as proposed by former 5th Cir judge (and my former colleague) Gregg Costa. Congress can still do this after today’s decision. harvardlawreview.org/blog/2018/01...

An Old Solution to the Nationwide Injunction Problem - Harvard Law Review

Samuel Bray’s Multiple Chancellors: Reforming the National Injunction addresses what has increasingly become the recipe for legal challenges to federal policies.  File suit in...

harvardlawreview.org

Seems right. Though isn't that just how it goes when the methodology is analogical and historical? Some of originalism's defenders say it better constrains judges and leaves less room for implementing the court's own political or policy preferences. But maybe it just makes it easier to hide them.

Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof@evanbernick.bsky.social · last yr.

And conservatives find analogies when it's stuff they like, deny analogies when it's stuff they don't. The level of abstraction goes up, goes down. Here, it goes down because they don't like universal injunctions because they think they give judges too much power. Therefore this is new and illegal.

Jackson seems right on the impact of CASA. Kavanaugh's attempt to soften the blow by pointing out that preliminary class-wide relief can still be granted on a regional or national basis isn't very convincing. As Jackson points out, it means anyone's rights can be threatened if they haven't sued yet.

I'm increasingly worried about one second-order effect of students relying on AI so much: that it undermines their CONFIDENCE to be able to distinguish smart-sounding but mediocre sludge from actually persuasive writing.... 1/3

"ChatGPT, Claude and Deepseek may 'look smart–but when complexity rises, they collapse'." I try to get my students to see that the point of the exam is not to produce text that looks smart but to actually BE persuasive to a smart human. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

When billion-dollar AIs break down over puzzles a child can do, it's time to rethink the hype | Gary Marcus

The tech world is reeling from a paper that shows the powers of a new generation of AI have been wildly oversold, says cognitive scientist Gary Marcus

theguardian.com

pretty shitty that young people now have to learn with both a 24/7 torrent of entertainment microtargeted to their neuroses in their pocket and a learning environment full of chirpy little prompts to press a button and fake their homework so they can spend a little more time in the neurosis torrent

Move fast+break things & creative disruption (themes we're starting to see echoed in uni management speak) means not respecting stakeholders enough to go through the normal processes of identifying and collaboratively solving problems and justifying the proposed changes to those affected by them.

Mar Hicks@histoftech.bsky.social · last yr.

As many of us people who study or work in tech tried to tell y’all, move fast & break things was always about POWER, not progress.

Thought UK friends might be curious to see some empirical research on whether adopting rightwing policies actually helps mainstream political parties. Hint: it doesn't (Thx to a lovely colleague for these) What else to do instead? Maybe defend an alternative vision or just change the convo?