Silvia Steininger

@silviasteininger.bsky.social

(international) law, social sciences & interdisciplinarity at @hertiecfr.bsky.social & @mpil.de. member of the board of @esil-sedi.bsky.social. #firstgen , 🐶, she/her. too loud & too excited about too many things.

A great example of how concepts rarely - if ever - used in legal studies, like creolization & semiperiphery, can shed light on both legal & sociological, literary & historical aspects of #Europe and #Europeanness! Many thanks to @silviasteininger.bsky.social & @jennyos.bsky.social for the dialogue!

European Law Open@europeanlawopen.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Take a walk on the dark side of European society: @silviasteininger.bsky.social and @jennyos.bsky.social on who is (and who is not) recognised. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

It's much worse than this. The 'review' is pervaded by the most astonishing case of anti-Italianism I've ever seen on print, and it beggars belief how any journal could even remotely consider to publish it. It's so unhinged that it becomes hilarious at times, but only because we're not the targets

James Chalmers@jameschalmers.bsky.social · 8mo ago

An academic disliked an Oxford Very Short Introduction (145 pages) in his field so much that he wrote a 200 page book review attacking it. www.pierre-legrand.com/ewExternalFi...

Last class tomorrow of international law, wrapping up the course. Decided we should talk about the boat strikes because it combines many concepts throughout the semester. I love using current events to understand course material, but oof it's a lot sometimes (all the time?).

🇪🇺 Marking 75 years of the #EuropeanConvention on Human Rights, #MPIL co-hosted a symposium with the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, warmly welcomed by Minister Stefanie Hubig & Deputy State Secretary Johannes Dimroth, exploring transnat. perspectives and glob. interaction. (1/6)

BildBildBildBild

🇮🇱🇪🇺⚖️🇵🇸 I am somewhat disappointed - but perhaps not surprised - that what one of the brightest minds in European public law can conjure in response to what is happening in Gaza amounts to a blog post that's simply an excerpt from the Bible with some bolded parts and one sentence from the author.

Bild

🇵🇱⚖️Adam Bodnar is out as the Polish Minister of Justice/Prosecutor General, why? First, being a good academic/human rights defender doesn't necessarily make you a good politician; second, you can't please everyone who wants to be pleased; third, timid people aren't suited for savage times. 1/

Bild

25 nations demand end to war on Gaza; slam Israel killing aid seekers Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK



“We, the signatories listed below, come together with a simple, urgent message: the war in Gaza must end now.

The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. The Israeli government’s aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity. We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food. It is horrifying that over 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid. The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable. Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law.

The hostages cruelly held captive by Hamas since 7 October 2023 continue to suffer terribly. We condemn their continued detention and call for their immediate and unconditional release. A negotiated ceasefire offers the best hope of bringing them home and ending the agony of their families.

We call on the Israeli government to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid and to urgently enable the UN and humanitarian NGOs to do their life saving work safely and effectively.

We call on all parties to protect civilians and uphold the obligations of international humanitarian law. Proposals to remove the Palestinian population into a “humanitarian city” are completely unacceptable. Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law.

We strongly oppose any steps towards territorial or demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The E1 settlement plan announced by Israel’s Civil Administration, if implemented, would divide a Palestinian state in two, marking a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution. Meanwhile, settlement building across the West Bank including East Jerusalem has accelerated while settler violence against Palestinians has soared. This must stop.

We urge the parti…

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that it does not breach the ECHR if EU Member States tax cross-border transactions within the EU (on the basis of EU law) more favourably than comparable domestic transactions. Analysis by Dr Samira Allioui: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2025/06/firs...

First decision by the European Court of Human Rights on suspicion of reverse discrimination in tax matters

Dr Samira-Asmaa Allioui , Research fellow, Centre d'études internationales et européennes, Université de Strasbourg Photo credit  : ...

eulawanalysis.blogspot.com

Have finished quick reading of 30k AG Ćapeta Opinion. Lots to unpack. Something which struck me was repeated use of "negation of" values (about 16 times) and "deviation from" (6 times) values / model of a constitutional democracy / model of good society. Use of "red lines" (6 times) also striking.

Laurent Pech 🇺🇦@profpech.bsky.social · last yr.

"By calling into question the equality of LGBTI persons, Hungary is not demonstrating a disagreement or a divergence about the content of [EU values]. Instead, that [MS] has negated several of those fundamental values and [...] has significantly deviated from the model of a constitutional democracy"

Paradox auch die affirmative Bezugnahme auf eine "rule-based international order" bei gleichzeitiger Absage an zentrale Prinzipien wie non-refoulement: Was denn nun? Lesenswerte Einordnung von Silvia Steininger👇

Verfassungsblog@verfassungsblog.de · last yr.

Nine member states have launched a direct attack on the ECtHR and its migration and asylum standards. SILVA STEININGER (@silviasteininger.bsky.social‬) asks: What are human rights for, if not to protect the rights of foreign criminals? verfassungsblog.de/letter-human...

Zitatkachel der Autorin Silvia Steininger mit dem Inhalt: "From the publication of the letter [...] to its populist tone and lack of legal clarity, it is apparent that the letter is not sufficient to account for an actual attempt at institutional reform (so far)."