timmysmum

@spinsnstitches.bsky.social

watching from afar and hoping the world will see a lady sitting at the resolute desk. Update, sadly not. Rage knitting through this sh*t show

R’s have the votes in the House to cut Medicaid. That could/should change. Voting for the “framework” might be easier than voting to actually enact Medicaid cuts, but R’s won tonight. We will fight this in Senate but it will come down to people outside of the capitol being sufficiently pissed off.

Nurses don’t tolerate patient harm at the bedside, & we shouldn’t w/ the next HHS secretary. We stand w/ these Nobel laureates in opposing RFK Jr nomination. We are the largest & most trusted profession: We must lead with values & oppose someone that threatens public health! @protect.our.care

Protect Our Care@protectourcare.org · 2y ago

"Placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public’s health in jeopardy and undermine America’s global leadership in the health sciences.”

Breaking News graphic with the headline 'Nobel Laureates Urge Senate to Turn Down Kennedy’s Nomination.' The subheading states: 'Elevating Mr. Kennedy to secretary of H.H.S. "would put the public’s health in jeopardy," more than 75 laureates wrote.' The image features a black-and-white photo of RFK Jr. speaking at a podium, with dramatic lighting and a textured dark background. The New York Times logo appears in the top right corner.

Folks, most nonprofit publications this month are in NewsMatch, a year-end program by big foundations to match your donations. If you read a nonprofit outlet & want it to thrive, THIS is time to donate or subscribe to them. Pick 1-2 & do it! If you value Bolts, join us here: boltsmag.org/donate

Robert Downen@robertdownen.bsky.social · 2y ago

The future of journalism is incredibly bleak. An industry already in crisis now faces this + heightened legal threats + the “nonprofit killer” bill + tariff-induced cutbacks in household discretionary spending. It’s existential. If you can, please support journalism now, before the worst hits.

I don't want to sound alarmist or anything, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to skip FBI background checks and bury congressional ethics reports about nominees to the most important posts in the federal government.