Chokely CarmichaelšŸ„‹

@stewartcoles.bsky.social

Asst Prof @ Illinois Dept of Communication studying media, politics, & identity, not necessarily in that order. UMich Comm & Media / SDSU Journalism & Media Studies / Drexel Digital Media alumnus / USMC veteran. Views = my own. http://www.stewartcoles.com

Two very interesting papers on how minorities respond to exclusion (having IDs not represented in info + categories presented to them). Somewhat different treatments and outcomes, and diff populations, but I think very parallel in spirit -- one account of mobilization, the other demobilization

BildBild

šŸ“¢ New online first article! Is narrative engagement really a single experience? This meta-analysis synthesizes 52 studies (N = 12,705) using the Narrative Engagement Scale (NES) to examine the structure and psychological functions of narrative engagement.

Bild

Yeah, the entire point of recognizing something as a social construct is to point out that we can always construct something different instead. Which means it’s not fate/nature/the gods, but something WE can act on. It politicizes the thing. Which (some) people will hate.

jadehawk "FREE ŁINK"@jadehawk.bsky.social · 6d ago

i just saw a "social construct meaning bad thing i don't like is actually also how academics use it" take, and i am baffled. even if the academic take is "XYZ is an oppressive social construct", the remedy is to create a more just construct?

Now that all of my dissertation papers have been accepted, I'm making a thread that puts all the papers in the same place! I interviewed local crime journalists to learn more about how the decline of local news, digital publishing, and changing attitudes towards criminal justice affect their work.

The very presence of these soldiers and settlers is illegal according to international law, see both the International Court of Justice's ruling from July 2024 that deemed Israel's occupation illegal & the UNSCR deeming settlements illegal, therefore it is legal to use force to repel their presence.

#StupidSuez@diplomatofnight.com Ā· 2w ago

Killing an illegally-present, occupying soldier is verbatim the most legal thing a person is allowed to do under every single international law.

Today's deadly clash in the West Bank began when about 30 settlers, including armed men and minors, entered Tell, a Palestinian village that Israelis are not allowed to enter, using a "hike" as cover. They did not coordinate with the IDF, even though it is required. The incident ended in a gunfight that killed two Israelis and four Palestinians, and the IDF sent five more companies to the area to contain the situation the settlers had started.

None of this excuses the Palestinian who seized a weapon and killed an Israeli officer. That is a crime in its own right, and two Israeli families are grieving tonight. But it does not change how the events began, or who set them in motion.

The University of Chicago Press held its launch meeting for my book today. Respectability Politics will be out Summer 2027, with a cover featuring original letterpress work by the artist Amos Kennedy, Jr. whose work I greatly admire! So excited to share this book with y’all. I’m really proud of it.

Engaging in the peer review process—from any position within it—would quickly disabuse anyone of the notion that the academy is full of groupthink. You can’t get even a small group of experts to agree on what is important or appropriate. Half the time they don’t even agree on what *is*.

And this is why criticisms of work or policies against speech that is ā€œpoliticalā€ are so pernicious. ā€œPoliticalā€ means many things to many people, and that ontological slipperiness can always be—and often has been—weaponized to censor certain viewpoints, particularly ones that criticize power.

For those of us who work in the field of Middle Eastern studies—those sentenced to the margins of the humanities, the rough lands—the limits of acceptable ā€œpoliticsā€ were clear decades ago. Now, after nearly three years of genocide, we have come to understand, without a shadow of doubt, that the ā€œpolitical,ā€ that which supposedly taints art, corrupts scholarship, and disrupts institutional harmony, is code for ā€œPalestine.ā€
Sarah J. Jackson@sjjphd.bsky.social Ā· 3w ago

I somehow missed that Law & Order made a (not surprisingly really problematic) episode entirely based on one of my colleagues and very loosely based on campus speech debates surrounding Gaza. She writes about it here. h/t @americanstudier.bsky.social

We need to change norms around sexual harassment Yesterday Tessa West spoke up about a sexual harassment complaint she filed against John Jost. Not only is he a senior colleague in the dept of psychology, but he is one of the most prominant figures in the field of social and political psychology.

Bild