Two very interesting papers on how minorities respond to exclusion (having IDs not represented in info + categories presented to them). Somewhat different treatments and outcomes, and diff populations, but I think very parallel in spirit -- one account of mobilization, the other demobilization
Alexander Agadjanian
@agadjanian.bsky.social
political science PhD candidate at UC Berkeley | Interests: race, identity, political psychology + behavior, public opinion | 🇦🇲🇸🇻 https://sites.google.com/view/alexander-agadjanian/home
Very religious bent to course evals this year for intro stats class 🤔 (course eval q was "What advice would you give to another student who is considering taking this course?")
Department floor is having a halloween door decor contest, I think our office wins for scariest @antoniaalksnis.bsky.social
Our conclusion is that survey professionalism is widespread on online panels, but these do not, by and large, distort inferences, making us cautiously optimistic about research using these online samples!
Very creative & well-done new @thejop.bsky.social: 🇩🇪 far-right support ⬆️ among people living near outdoor swimming pools when you enter summer months (when these pools become popular) -- but only in areas that have more immigrants. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
Biennial update on racial resentment trends in the CES: after a white Dems shift *away* from racially liberal trajectory in 2022, we're back in that direction in 2024.
we have now posted the 2024 Cooperative Election Study common content dataset to the @harvarddataverse.bsky.social! data from 60,000 American adults interviewed before & after the election. thanks to @today.yougov.com & Caroline Soler for getting this data produced & posted doi.org/10.7910/DVN/...
Interesting new JEPS on POC solidarity building. Besides substantive contribution, another example of getting creative with experiments to learn about mechanisms (vs. conventional mediation analysis-only). On a very different topic, here's another good example along these methodological lines
Interesting new paper on this topic (www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...) -- misinfo itself has more direct, widespread consequences, but factual beliefs again seem to be outside of the equation
Misperceptions but not attitudes/behaviors being moveable is no surprise--imo one of the most well-replicated patterns in polisci work. Puzzle remains: do factual beliefs really not affect attitudes/behaviors? Or are we not looking at the right beliefs? Some evidence on latter tinyurl.com/py4tu3d5
Two good places to donate for supporting LA wildfire relief efforts: 1. Eaton Fire Relief and Recovery Fund (from Pasadena Community Foundation) pasadenacf.org/supporting-o... 2. Immigrant Fire Relief Fund (from National Day Laborer Organizing Network) secure.actblue.com/donate/lafir...
Supporting Our Community: Eaton Canyon Fire Relief & Recovery Fund | Pasadena Community Foundation
Dear Pasadena Community Foundation Family, We have all been glued to the news watching the devastation of the Eaton Canyon fire to our neighbors. My heart g ...
pasadenacf.org
APSR will start inviting replications for a random subset of accepted papers. I really like this as well as the constructive tone around it 👏 (from the latest Notes from the Editors)
Interesting perspectives. Feels like some disconnect from standard polisci accounts (e.g. effects of misinfo/fact-checks often have limited scope, but that doesn't mean misinfo is overall inconsequential www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1...). Was also curious about this part and dug around on the cites...
In this new article in American Psychologist we respond to critics in detail and clarify two key points for the field; (1) The prevalence of misinformation in society is substantial when properly defined. (2) Misinformation causally impacts attitudes and behaviors. psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
Friends don't let friends capture operational ideology via self-described ideological ratings, a series
Super valuable new study that randomly assigns 7k+ Americans to old vs. new Census race formats. Among many interesting patterns: 1. White & "some other race" %'s ⬇️ by 6 and 4 pts. 2. No change in overall Hisp and Black %'s. 3. Small but detectable ⬇️ Black + Hisp responses.
NEW: René D. Flores, Edward Telles, Ilana M. Ventura, "New OMB’s Race and Ethnicity Standards Will Affect How Americans Self-Identify"
“East Bay hot, South Bay not” was apparently a popular saying in like the 80s and I’m gonna bring it back
Just now seeing this paper reanalyzing the "Many Teams" paper on racial bias in soccer (29 teams analyze the same RQ with the same data, find different results). This reanalysis finds that variation in findings results from theoretical / interpretive differences. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Has the Credibility of the Social Sciences Been Credibly Destroyed? Reanalyzing the “Many Analysts, One Data Set” Project - Katrin Auspurg, Josef Brüderl, 2021
In 2018, Silberzahn, Uhlmann, Nosek, and colleagues published an article in which 29 teams analyzed the same research question with the same data: Are soccer re...
journals.sagepub.com
What are some good examples of political science papers using observational data published with null results?
Here's a nice new paper from the fully blueskyless author team of Philip Moniz, Rodrigo Ramirez-Perez, Erin Hartman, and Stephen Jessee, showing that survey exp. effects are similar for "eager" and "reluctant" respondents, with positive implications for generalizability doi.org/10.1017/pan....
I did not attend UNC, but I did attend *America.* So you’re damn right I’m rooting for UNC tonight.
Your reminder that I’m a UNC alum and we’re playing Duke tonight. Mute as needed
It's wild to see some 2024 election polls show Hispanic vote split almost evenly across Biden/Trump (e.g. twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/st...) Took a quick look at what various polls in last month show + how they compare to same time last cycle (Dec. 2019). For 2024, even split is actually not that typical
For any Premier League fans out there: a look at team performance relative to what we'd expect from expected goals now that we're ~halfway through the season. Hoping some of this underperforming (Chelsea) and overperforming (Tottenham) balances out the rest of the way 😬
More on genetic ancestry tests from a great new American Journal of Sociology piece (using an RCT): these tests have important consequences for facets of whites' identities, but notably *do not* cause changes to how whites racially self-identify www.suleyaylaci.com/wp-content/u...
Great piece on the folly of DNA tests. Two key points: 1. The premise that we can genetically determine someone's race misunderstands the idea of race so is it's off to begin with. 2. Even for assessing ancestral origins, the science involved and how the public interprets it is riddled w/issues.
Me watching another paper I reviewed eventually get accepted for publication while still working through some roadblocks in my own research
Are presidential election polls predictive this far out from election day? Lot of skepticism, but as @gelliottmorris.bsky.social and I have shown, current era might contrast from earlier decades, e.g. poll predictiveness didn't change much over ~year before 2016. An update to now include 2020...
Really great, comprehensive paper on consequences of popular pro-police TV shows: -cops make more victimless crime+drug possession arrests when followed by cameras -no impact on public safety (solved crimes, amt of crime) -some public attitudes around police improve papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....