tanadrin

@tanadrin.bsky.social

Fiction, worldbuilding, and other nonsense at tanadrin.de. I also poast at tanadrin.tumblr.com. Aurë entuluva!

The frustrating thing is that the counter argument is right there: concretely frame it in terms of tradeoffs. How many deaths is your pastoralist fantasy worth, exactly? Please be specific. But you need someone to actually make that argument.

Increasingly think we need a ‘modernity is actually good’ political tendency. the right is putatively pro-industry and economic growth but thinks science is gay and wants to throw out vaccines for essential oils, the left putatively believes science but also embraces crank degrowth NIMBYism

this is really interesting. i guess the efficiency gains for specializing/modularizing parts of a system are such that there's always going to be an incentive to do that as long as you're operating under any kind of constraint (calories, time, computing power).

pengrui-han.bsky.social@pengrui-han.bsky.social · last mo.

The human brain is strikingly modular: distinct networks for language, formal reasoning, social reasoning, physical reasoning. Is this fundamental to intelligent systems, or an accident of evolution? In our new preprint, we find the same modular organization emerges in LLMs.

apparently the only way to prevent periodic heat domes over western europe would be to irrigate the whole iberian peninsula. and im just saying i think it’s worth a shot at this point.