Thora Bjornsdottir

@thorabjorns.bsky.social

psychology lecturer at Stirling Uni person perception, social groups, inequality dogs, sci fi, punk 🏳️‍🌈🇮🇸 https://rthorabjornsdottir.wordpress.com/

A six-month investigation by Byline Times reveals that with the support of Palantir's Peter Thiel, Reform's policy chief James Orr has used the University of Cambridge as a student recruitment ground for a hard-right, theocratic political project aimed at bolstering talent in Farage’s party

Palantir Co-Founder Peter Thiel and Reform UK's Cambridge University Recruitment Pipeline Project Revealed

The world-renowned academic institution has nothing to say in response to a six-month investigation by Byline Times raising serious concerns about the safeguarding of students and foreign influence at...

bylinetimes.com

Great analogy for the impacts of social and wealth inequality in this piece. We allow people to fall off cliffs and pay exorbitant amounts of money to patch them up instead of investing in a fence to stop them falling off 👏

East Anglia Bylines@eastangliabylines.co.uk · 4w ago

Britain is richer than ever. So why are people anxious, unhealthy and divided? Two leading thinkers argue the real problem isn't growth – it's inequality. And other countries show there's a better way, writes Stephen McNair

'it’s never been about jobs. The scapegoating of immigrants and African Americans for “taking” what belongs to whites is but the moral and political justification for everyday white buy-in to the state-sanctioned violence against these groups. The policing is the payout'

Gautham Rao (pronounced: Knicks in 5)@gauthamrao.bsky.social · last mo.

Thank you @saigrundy.bsky.social for this thoughtful engagement with my book, White Power: Policing American Slavery "a universal right to anti-Black violence and a state-backed justification...obligations as citizens to protect the white man’s property" www.theguardian.com/inequality/n...

I finally figured out why AI causes such a visceral reaction in thinking humans: I am writing my book chapter on PLAY, and AI is the opposite of play. We play for the joy of the process, not for the outcome. Yes it is nice to win, to have the art/ poem, but the point of life is to play.

Struggling to know what to read or do following the announcement of the UK's anti-trans segregation regime? I've created a basic set of information, resources, and actions - in the form of an auto-reply sent to every single person who emails me at work.

Supreme Court auto-reply: 2026 anti-segregation edition

What if every person who emailed you faced the reality of the UK’s segregation regime? Last year I created an internal auto-reply for my work email, in the wake of the 2025 Supreme Court judg…

ruthpearce.net

new open-access paper w/ @jpwilson.bsky.social & his student out in Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. We provide evidence that positive effects of medical masks on trust/responsibility judgments are due to BOTH perceptual (occulsion) & social factors (masks' social meaning) doi.org/10.1007/s109...

The Effect of Medical Face Masks on First Impressions Across Race and Time: Testing Social and Perceptual Explanations - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

A growing body of research shows medical face masks to affect face perception and recognition. Although face masks negatively impact recognition of face identities and emotion expressions, they largely positively affect trait impressions. Here, focusing on impressions of trustworthiness and responsibility, we bridge between various lines of inquiry in the extant literature. First, among American perceivers, we test whether the effect of masks varies by target faces’ race, crucially including targets from three racial groups: Asian, Black, and White. Next, we examine the extent to which effects can be explained by the presence of masks versus the absence of lower facial information. Finally, we examine the role of temporal context, testing masks’ effect on trustworthiness and responsibility judgments in early 2021 and mid 2023. Altogether, we find face masks to have a positive effect on trustworthiness and responsibility judgments. Lack of lower facial information explained some, but not all, of the effect of masking, indicating that masks provide a specific social signal that affects trait judgments beyond the effect of occlusion. Finally, we found the positive effect of masking on trait judgments to persist in 2023 but decrease in magnitude compared to 2021, indicating that the social meaning of masks has waned over time. Masking effects were moreover stronger for White than Black (2021, 2023) and Asian targets (2023) and among perceivers with more positive attitudes toward masking (especially in 2023). Altogether, we provide evidence that both bottom-up perceptual and top-down social factors influence social perceptions of masked faces.

doi.org

In a world that often feels deeply polarized, it is rare to find a topic where almost everyone agrees. The treatment of farm animals is one of them. Surveys across many countries show that a strong majority of people, regardless of their diet, oppose common practices in animal agriculture.

Bar chart of survey responses from about 1,000 UK adults in 2022 where most respondents rate a range of common farming practices for chickens, cows and pigs as "not acceptable," highlighting a gap between public concern for farm animals and current practices. Data source: Bryant Research (2022). License: CC BY.

What share of income goes to the richest 1% in your country? How about the richest 10% or 0.1%? How has that changed over time? The World Inequality Database (WID) is the leading source for answering questions about incomes and wealth at the very top of the distribution.

Line chart of the income share of the richest 1% of the population (before taxes and benefits) showing trends from 1974 to 2024 for Chile, India, the USA, France, and Finland. It shows Chile with the highest and most volatile share, peaking above 30 percent, India and the USA rising steadily to about 20 to 25 percent by 2024, and France and Finland remaining lower and comparatively stable around about 5 to 12 percent. The data source is the World Inequality Database (2026). The chart is licensed CC BY to Our World in Data.

"the charisma of AI organised the entire political conversation around the technology...[and] occluded something deeper: the human decisions that led to the killing of between 175 and 180 people... Someone decided to compress the kill chain. Someone decided that deliberation was latency."

AI got the blame for the Iran school bombing. The truth is far more worrying

LLMs-gone-rogue dominated coverage, but had nothing to do with the targeting. Instead, it was choices made by human beings, over many years, that gave us this atrocity

theguardian.com

Oh really? Is that because pandering to the far-right and assuming they will act rationally, reciprocally, & in good faith has always worked in the past, & because there's good evidence that Reform can be trusted? I totally trust this former Tory advisor report published by a right-wing think tank.

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social · 5mo ago

'Universities must build bridges with populist parties and take steps to restore their legitimacy among the general public or face being recast as “convenient enemies” by the next Westminster government, according to a new report.' 1/2