@vanderbiltaaup.bsky.social

“Conservatives have spent 40 years attacking the legitimacy of higher education as an institution, which means to restore trust in academia we have to make the university less woke.” I mean, after a certain point the willingness of so many leaders to just flat out lie has to catch up to them…right?

@vanderbiltaaup.bsky.social · 6d ago

You cannot speak for a community without consulting its members. You cannot declare “first principles” for a university without faculty participation. The Vanderbilt faculty did not draft or “adopt” this. www.vanderbilt.edu/declaration/

You cannot speak for a community without consulting its members. You cannot declare “first principles” for a university without faculty participation. The Vanderbilt faculty did not draft or “adopt” this. www.vanderbilt.edu/declaration/

Declaration

The University and Its Purpose: A Declaration of First Principles was adopted by the Vanderbilt University Board of Trust in June 2026. The declaration is organized around three core purposes: Pathbre...

vanderbilt.edu

Federal research cuts to minority serving colleges have threatened to crush the aspirations of young scholars who, just a few years ago, were hired because of their expertise on race-related topics that many now feel pressure to play down. https://chroni.cl/4yyNb4h

The Research Cuts No One Is Talking About

Minority-serving institutions are quietly being denied funds key to their aspirations. Their leaders don’t want to discuss it.

chronicle.com

OUT TODAY, the AAUP just released the first comprehensive account of how the Trump administration has taken the same playbook it's used on law firms & foreign governments & turned it on American universities. US higher ed has, in effect, become a target of a massive extortion racket. 🧵

New Report on Extorted Compliance Charges “Massive Extortion Racket” Against Higher Ed

A new AAUP report, "Extorted Compliance: A Threat to Institutional Autonomy, Academic Freedom, and Shared Governance," exposes how the Trump administration has extended its pay-to-play approach to gov...

aaup.org

We join with faculty in Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, and Texas to note with dismay that central tenets of the AAUP have disappeared from the Principles of Accreditation of the Commission on Colleges and Universities (formerly SACSCOC). 🧵 1/8 sacscoc.org/principles-r...

Principles Review - SACSCOC

SACSCOC Principles of Accreditation review The future of accreditation should be shaped by the institutions and stakeholders it serves. The Principles Review Committee, composed of peer representative...

sacscoc.org

Just spell it out clearly: Vanderbilt’s chancellor is collabing with tech fascists like Peter Thiel to turn Vanderbilt into a Silicon Valley subsidiary, which requires discrediting those forms of knowledge that question AI’s empire via the Vanderbilt Report.

There is great value in refuting the specific charges in the Vanderbilt Report against various disciplines but we also need to repeatedly say is that this Report is about invalidating critical thought to pave the way for the tech-fascist takeover of the university. That, in the end, is the motive.

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · last mo.

More evidence that the purpose of the Vanderbilt Report is to pave the way for tech-fascism by discrediting those disciplines that are at the forefront of the critical study of AI: www.nashvillescene.com/news/pithint...

Screenshot of report on collaboration between Peter Thiel and Vanderbilt

“The advancement of knowledge through scholarship has always been inextricable from political goals; the Vanderbilt report position is based on a completely fictitious version of a pre-political scholarly past.“ open.substack.com/pub/asheeshk...

The Vanderbilt Report Ignores the History of Scholarship

Criticizing the distortion of scholarship by politics, the authors conveniently elide how knowledge and politics have long been intertwined.

open.substack.com

"We also asked about how the committee’s work was funded. The chair, Boghossian, told us that the money did not come from a private foundation but rather the coffers of Vanderbilt and Wash U." unsurprising but also SERIOUSLY WTF www.chronicle.com/article/insi...

Is a New Report About the Humanities ‘Diabolically Evil’? We Questioned Its Authors.

K. Anthony Appiah, Paul Boghossian, Katherine Fleming, and Sean Wilentz on what’s gone wrong in the humanities.

chronicle.com

AAUP NC VP Tori Ekstrand argues that "institutional neutrality" as imposed on UNC system schools not only chills academic freedom and free speech, it forces universities to surrender their ability to protect their educational and research missions. www.newsobserver.com/opinion/arti...

Professor: Here’s an alternative to UNC’s charade of ‘institutional neutrality’ | Opinion

The author is a professor at the UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media.

newsobserver.com

AAUP members came together @ the Higher Ed Summit & Biennial to approve a package of critical proposals that will serve as a sweeping strategic blueprint for our Union to build structural power & go on the offensive against the political & economic threats to higher ed in this moment. 🧵

Bild

The AAUP chapters at Vanderbilt & Wash U have issued a joint statement denouncing the “State of Scholarship” report commissioned by their chancellors. Please, let’s make this as widely read as the gaslighting to which it responds.

Joint Statement on the "State of Scholarship" Report
The Vanderbilt University and Washington University chapters of the American Association of University Professors express our profound disagreement with the "State of Scholarship" report commissioned by our universities' chancellors. The report distorts the state of humanistic and social scientific scholarship at our universities and in the academy overall. Worse, it proposes a shocking intrusion of university administration into faculty governance and portends greater threats to academic freedom that should concern all faculty.
The report currently appears on Vanderbilt's website under the insignia of both Vanderbilt and Washington Universities. It is already receiving public condemnation. As the American Council of Learned Societies makes clear, the report is founded on false premises and anecdotal evidence and thus does nothing to "ensure deeper and more meaningful relations among scholars and members of the public." No doubt more rebuttals from scholars, departments, and professional societies will follow. It suffices for us to say that the report falls far short of the standards of political neutrality and disinterested inquiry it claims to champion. Historians, literary scholars, and anthropologists are singled out for caricature while the authors fail to acknowledge their own public biases against scholarship performed in the name of social justice. Nor does the report divulge its source of funding or conflicts of interest that may entail - standard practice for any work of humanistic or social scientific scholarship. In sum, the report is itself a clear example of "politicized" research that its authors attempt to decry.
What is most alarming is the guidance the report offers to its intended audience of university chancellors and presidents. By falsely arguing that humanities and social science departments are in the throes of an epistemological crisis, the authors lay the groundwork for university adminis…Weakening faculty governance does nothing to solve the real challenges facing our universities, and undermines our ability to effectively address society's most profound problems and challenges, from the inequalities of wealth and white supremacy to the political consequences of climate change.
Indeed, the direst threats to public trust in higher education are not philosophical debates about the nature of truth. Currently, the federal government is dramatically cutting funding for the humanities and social sciences as well as for the natural sciences, engineering, medicine, public health, and the arts. In response, university administrations have instituted austerity measures, even as administrative salaries and administrative positions have taken up an increasing share of decreasing budgets.
The best way for scholars to cultivate diverse opinions and advance knowledge is by strengthening academic freedom. Political threats to higher education have degraded, and will continue to degrade, the quality of all fields of our universities' research, to the detriment of America's global standing.
We note that the organizations now working most actively and successfully to defend academic free inquiry from politicized federal interference are not university leaders but the American Council of Learned Societies, the Modern Language Association, and the American Historical Association - professional societies of the very disciplines chastised by the report.
We call on our chancellors to rescind the report and affirm their commitment to the intellectual autonomy of faculty, academic departments, and governing faculty bodies. Administrative interference into academic departments, as licensed by this report, is a violation of the standards of academic freedom that have made American universities the envy of the world. Rather than undermining these bedrock principles, administrators should vigorously and publicly defend them.
Vanderbilt University AAUP
vanderbiltaaup@gmail.com
Wa…

The Chronicle piece on the "Vanderbilt report" and the news about the dissolution of the faculty senate at Auburn really should have been reported together as two pieces of THE SAME STORY. Follow @asheeshks.org if you don't see how they go together. I mean, damn. It's open season on higher ed.

More on the Vanderbilt report. In “The Nature of the Problem” section, the authors claim that “liberal skew in the professoriat” plays a role in “discouraging full participation in academia on the part of students who find themselves culturally and politically alienated from their professors.”

Jason Rhody@jasonrhody.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Reading the State of Scholarship Report left me with the same feeling I had when leading disinformation work at SSRC and people said "I love democracy but I'm really worried about voter fraud." This report is "I love the humanities but I'm really worried about scholarly standards.”

🚨On the recent Vanderbilt report on the humanities: “the committee takes a…disturbing direction toward endorsing academic authoritarianism—the use of administrative power to seize control of academic departments + impose ideological standards on them in order to purge leftist scholars.”

Academic Authoritarianism in New Attack on Humanities Scholars

There is virtually no evidence offered in the report for its sweeping conclusions about the entirety of the humanities.

insidehighered.com

I'm sure it's completely coincidental that Vanderbilt & Wash U spearheaded a report casting doubt on scholarship in "the humanities and humanistic social sciences," disciplines at the forefront of critiquing tech-fascism, at the very same moment they're about to cash in on tech-fascist investments.

Max Kennerly@maxkennerly.bsky.social · 2mo ago

UNC, UVa, Stanford, WashU, and Vanderbilt took the billions in federal funding they got over the years and handed it to Elon Musk so he could build a CSAM generator, wreck the NSF, and shutter USAID.