These people are destroying sports and destroying small businesses, and they want to take over MA's elections via Question 3. Don't let them. Vote no on 3. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

‘People are feeling the real impacts’: influencers use humor to make fun of the private equity industry

The trillion-dollar industry has taken over social media, inspiring skits and parody raps with millions of views

theguardian.com

No on 3 welcomes @wutrain.bsky.social into our coalition to protect working class families.

We need your help to take on their millions. Get involved ⬇️

Progressive Mass@progressivemass.bsky.social · last wk.

Don’t let Bain Capital buy our democracy. www.bostonglobe.com/2026/10/02/m...

for Q3: • private equity and venture capital execs • Jake Auchincloss and Seth Moulton, the two worst MA representatives • Charlie Baker against Q3: • Progressive Mass • Ayanna Pressley • Ed Markey as I've said before, even if I knew nothing else but who's on which side, that'd be enough. No on 3!

Nik DeCosta-Klipa@nikdecostaklipa.bsky.social · last wk.

First in @wbur.org's Mass. Politics newsletter: Just a few hours after former Gov. Charlie Baker endorsed Question 3, Rep. Ayanna Pressley came out against the all-party primary ballot question: www.wbur.org/news/massach...

Hey Mass Voters: vote no on 3, all party/jungle primaries. If we want new ideas in office, we need ranked choice voting, not this. An all party *reduces* candidate options to ensure wins (bad). Also it’s for corporations to buy candidates. No thanks! #mapoli #NoOn3 www.votenoon3mass.com/voteno

Why Vote NO on Question 3 in Massachusetts? — Voter Rights MA

The Yes on 3 campaign is making misleading claims. Learn why voting NO preserves election fairness, protects independent voices, and prevents billionaire influence in Massachusetts elections.

votenoon3mass.com

State Senator Lydia Edwards live with Jim and Margery NOW on @wgbh.org! Call in with your questions: 877-301-8970

Congresswoman @ayannapressley.bsky.social is proud to join our broad coalition to oppose this harmful ballot question and keep power in the hands of the people. Vote No on 3.

If Q3 passes then rich Republicans would be able to: - Fund more Democrats to run and split the vote - Bribe Republicans (beyond the top 2) to drop out With the goal of splitting the D vote and forcing two unpopular Republicans as the only two choices in the general election.

"A top-two system expands the power of wealthy interests in general elections...That’s exactly why those wealthy interests are pushing for it: in Massachusetts, more than 60% of the money raised to pass Question 3 has come from just five private equity executives." @workingfamilies.org

Question 3 is designed to make it easier for candidates who don’t want to do the really hard work of our democracy. It’s to make it easier to buy elections. Vote NO on Question 3 and watch this for more. #mapoli youtu.be/BqN6Myk0GPM?...

Massachusetts ballot Question 3 would eliminate political party primaries in state elections

YouTube video by CBS Boston

youtu.be

Hey #mapoli read @blackjew.bsky.social on why we need to vote No on 3 www.javawithjimmy.com/whats-percol...

Vote NO on Question 3 By Jordan Berg Powers — Java With Jimmy

The Yes on 3 campaign has raised about $5.6 million, with just 15 donors supplying over $4.09 million. Executives from two of the larger private equity firms, Bain Capital and Berkshire Partners, acco...

javawithjimmy.com

Need my fellow Massholes to vote NO on Question 3 so that private equity can’t just easily buy themselves moderate candidates here in the Commonwealth.

It’s raining hard here in MA, and the private equity money has been raining down hard in support of Question 3 (jungle primaries). Remember, folks: The most dangerous words in the English language are “We’re from private equity, and we’re here to help.” Vote NO on 3. #mapoli

The Yes on 3 campaign (jungle primaries) keeps saying that Q3 will lead to more candidates running. They fail to understand the actual barriers potential candidates face and will make those barriers even greater.

"This is a system that rewards wealthy candidates." Rep. Andy Vargas is voting No on Question 3.

@masspolprofmo.bsky.social follows the money ⬇️

When it comes to ballot questions, follow the money. The funding for Question 3 isn’t coming from democracy advocates. It’s coming from private equity execs and venture capitalists who bankroll education privatization, conservative Dems, and Republicans across the country. #NoOn3

Question 3 will fundamentally change how we choose our leaders, and not for the better. SEIU endorses #NOon3 in the fight to stop billionaires from buying our elections.

Follow the private equity money.

New ballot question reports are in, and it couldn’t be more clear: Question 3 (jungle primaries / all-party primaries / top two) is an effort by billionaires to rig our election system in their favor.

We’re educating voters on the dangers of Question 3. Check out some of the voices from California, candidates of color, and our coalition members featured in @the-downballot.com's coverage ⬇️

Don't let this party primary be our last. Be a voter today AND 11/3.

"At a time when we’re telling people that affordability is one of our highest priorities, we shouldn’t make democracy less affordable for the very people we want to step forward and serve." Sen. Adam Gomez is voting No on Question 3.

These are the candidates who would be hurt by top-two primaries. They ran in contested primaries. They won without permission from anyone. They know what Question 3 would do to the next person who tries.

dear MA friends: VOTE “NO“ ON THE JUNGLE PRIMARY

Stephen Wolf@stephenwolf.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Ugh: A new Massachusetts poll has a 51-32 lead for a ballot initiative to adopt the top-two “primary” system. This system has been a wreck in California. The majority party frequently risks getting shut out of general elections, so party organizations often pick favorites in primaries to avoid that

”It’s not that our current system is good. It’s that this alternate one is worse,“ said @jonathancohn.bsky.social, policy director for @progressivemass.bsky.social. commonwealthbeacon.org/ballot-quest...

Odd bedfellows: Progressive critics join Democratic, Republican party bosses to oppose election reform ballot question

“It’s not that our current system is good. It’s that this alternate one is worse,” says Jonathan Cohn, policy director for Progressive Mass.

commonwealthbeacon.org

"We are a bunch of grassroots organizations and unions and people who think every day about trying to make the world a better place, and our opposition are people with a lot of money." www.wbur.org/news/2026/08...

Mass. Democrats and unions launch campaign against all-party primary ballot question

If passed, Question 3 would replace party primaries in Massachusetts with an "all-party" system in which all candidates — Democrats, Republicans, etc. — compete in the same preliminary election and th...

wbur.org

Question 3 wants to turn our primary elections into a contest over who has the biggest bankroll, not the most grassroots support. Voting NO will protect the first-time, working-class, and candidates of color that are more likely to get locked out due to fear of being a spoiler.