sasha

@2damntrans.bsky.social

cymraes. transexual. sex-critical feminist. classical libertarian. abertawe. she/her. 🌹🏴🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇵🇸

I do get the argument that helmets discourage cycling and off-load the responsibility for safety onto the cyclist, and are a crutch in the absence of appropriate infrastructure: but until you have appropriate infrastructure maybe protecting your brain isn't such a bad idea?

The Netherlands announced a ban on trade with the illegal Israeli settlement enterprise and is set to have it officially implemented in September. In response, Israel has ejected the Dutch diplomatic mission from the US-overseen multinational "ceasefire coordination" team in Kiryat Gat.

Sa’ar boots Dutch from US-backed Gaza coordination center over ‘anti-Israel measures’

Foreign minister cites Amsterdam's recent ban on imports from settlements to justify ousting representatives from the Netherlands from base in southern Israel used to monitor Gaza ceasefire

timesofisrael.com

She denied Nazi crimes against trans people. That's a fact. Whether this counts as Holocaust denial depends on how you define it (and I've seen historians define it differently); but this is most certainly not any kind of libellous statement if you adopt the broader (quite commonplace) definition.

Alejandra Caraballo@esqueer.net · yesterday

This is factually true but you can't criticize JK Rowling in the UK without having ruinous lawfare threatened against you.

Screenshot of a post on X by Press Gazette (@pressgazette) reporting: "Metro has apologised for having 'wrongly stated that JK Rowling had been 'engaged in Holocaust denial'' in a story about the new Harry Potter TV series and removed the allegation."
​The post embeds a link preview from metro.co.uk showing portraits of Kit Harington, Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart, and Nicholas Hoult, overlaid with a "BREAKING NEWS" graphic reading "Nicholas Hoult backs out of Harry Potter after JK Rowling ba..."

So its effective implementations are going to be in low cost advertising and internet slop for people too impatient, and with ideas too inchoate, to make memes. I'd basically bet that it can not transcend this role regardless of possibly vast technical improvements to the base technology.

Then people with a more clear creative vision are bound to find it infuriating to work with a probabilistic algorithm to realize it. It probably requires *more* labour to get something good out of it, and force the appearance of deterministic consistency, so it's also not going to be economical.

because again, the limiting factor is not the imitative efficiency of the algorithm, it's that the people who are interested in it are creatively impoverished, possibly for reasons that are inextricable from the ease it is supposed to offer in engaging with creative work without skill.

AI will improve to the point that characters will be able to act naturally, it will be able to capture more angles, will be able to have more interesting aesthetics etc. Then people will be shocked to find out that the common output is nevertheless still the old dreadful slop anyway

altho speaking of "campism" it needs to be admitted that i've noticed a few of the voices who were against it ended up becoming campists themselves, just from the other direction. which is not really an improvement, is it.

according to clearsky I am on the lists "liberal bootlickers" (non-tankies) as well as "leftoids" (leftist/ish people) and my personal fave: "people who use shitlib as a pejorative" (leftists again, I suppose???) so that's stalinists, right-wingers, and blue maga types, all upset with me :(

And this is just so fucking weird to anarchists. Because like, sure those given arrangements or power loci in the present are bad, but we're longtermists: we're trying to overcome patterns of power that have enslaved humanity for at least ten thousand years, of which those are just epiphenomena.

Like if you look at the leftists who are most apoplectic at anarchists' hostility to campism, there's a palpable sense of confusion and betrayal from them. Don't we recognize there's Enemies that our Team must defeat?? The whole point is about defeating those Enemies and rallying power to do so!

So like, there is a very solid sense in which the leftists of the 80s-00s who screamed bloody murder about how Antifa was alienating potential neonazi allies against globalization and the leftists of today who want to ally with antisemites and theocratic empires are all totally in keeping with that.

"Everyone who sat on the left in a hall during the French Revolution" is not a statement of timeless universal values striking to the root of reality, it was a messy pragmatic and historically-contingent coalition (inclusive of rabid capitalists) all opposed to a situational enemy (the monarchy).