Daniel Aldana Cohen

@aldasky.bsky.social

Political economy of climate emergency. Assistant Professor of Sociology, UC Berkeley; Director, Socio-Spatial Climate Collaborative, or (SC)2; Founding Co-Director, Climate and Community Institute @cplusc.bsky.social. A Planet to Win (Verso). he/him

Here's a plan for housing as a human right: ☑️ National rent control ☑️ Universal rent and energy bill assistance ☑️ National disaster insurance ☑️ Social housing development Proud to put this forward with @aldasky.bsky.social @markpaulecon.bsky.social @moira.bsky.social @hjacobcarlson.bsky.social

Game Changers: Economic Policies for a Working America

Game Changers presents policymakers with bold, new ideas to build a stronger, fairer, greener, and more inclusive economy for all Americans.

peri.umass.edu

Here's the proposal from @aldasky.bsky.social, Maddison Wells, and myself on how we can eliminate housing and energy insecurity immediately for millions of people while also driving deep residential decarbonization for the climate. It's win-win-win policy for people, planet, and faith in government.

Toward Housing as a Human Right: Eliminate Extreme Housing and Energy Insecurity with a Safe Housing Foundation

The Problem Most Americans living in deep housing insecurity are renters, unhoused, or precariously housed. Only one quarter of households eligible for a Housing Choice Voucher are able to get one; th...

peri.umass.edu

What Mamdani’s EDC *should* do is start transforming a neoliberal growth model that currently depends on property bubbles and wall street bonuses to fund city services. Will its new leaders do that? TBD. But you can’t run a social democratic city on a neoliberal foundation.

Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani@mayor.nyc.gov · 2w ago

Affordability doesn't come from just decreasing costs, but increasing opportunity for working people. The city's Economic Development Corporation is at the heart of this work. Today, I proudly appointed Tony Shorris as President and CEO and Lina Khan as Chair of the EDC.

Another round of intense rainfall threatens to overwhelm New York City's outdated infrastructure and put lives at risk. In a new @nycpolicyforum.bsky.social interview with CCI Strategic Co-Director @aldasky.bsky.social, @ericklinenberg.bsky.social reflects on cloudburst management in the metropolis:

How to Handle a Rain Bomb

Eric Klinenberg and Daniel Aldana Cohen discuss flash flooding and sponge infrastructure in New York City

nycpolicyforum.substack.com

Last July @sfmta.com quietly published a report analyzing the performance of retrofitted extended range in-motion-charging based trolleybuses essentially confirming our high level proposal and strengthening the case for a full on electrification alternatives analysis. The upshot:

Peter Butler@peter-butler.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I am no expert at all on the pros/cons of wired grid vs. individual batteries, and I honestly don't love the wires myself, but if the wires are already there ... The SF Muni trolley buses are also quite modern www.urban-transport-magazine.com/en/san-franc...

Excited to share a new paper on transformative statecraft. We start from a critique of the compensation consensus in climate politics/political science. Compensating losers works – plenty of evidence for that. But when the goal is transformation (not reform), we need to think about mobilization. 🧵

Title: Beyond compensation: Climate politics, mobilization, and transformative statecraft 

Authors: Benjamin Braun & Leah Downey 

July 8, 2026 

Abstract: Governments have pursued decarbonization through a combination of subsidies for capital and compensation for people. Political scientists have identified the compensation of those who incur losses from climate policies as the the central challenge in building green coalitions and achieving a just transition. However, a decarbonization path aimed at limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius en- tails transformative change for virtually everyone. We argue that, under such con- ditions, a compensation-based approach reduces green backlash to pocketbook concerns; citizens to bundles of fixed preferences; and evaluation to policy-by- policy assessment. Proposing to move beyond compensating existing preferences, we contend that transformative statecraft reshapes preferences through political mobilization. From this perspective, a technocratic approach—focused on calcu- lation and compensation—constitutes a binding constraint on green statecraft. We defend this mobilization-based approach against the objections of manipulation and deprivation of freedom and suggest that a democratic version of transforma- tive statecraft is possible.

My view: we need a TVA for energy transmission. It may take a minute, but we can't limit ourselves to public planning and public subsidy. This infrastructure is just too crucial for economic and climate safety to split power and ownership w private firms. And we have to move w purpose.

Anchored in the world’s largest fossil fuel producer, and sandwiched between Qatar (2022) and Saudi Arabia (2034), we’re witnessing the Global Warming World Cup, whose profits come from the very industries that are melting us all.

Bild

Heat is a feminist issue. Heat is a disability rights issue. Heat is definitely a class issue. Heat is also definitely experienced by racialized minorities in extreme ways. In India, heat is a caste issue. Extreme heat reveals the fissures in societies and who we are willing to ‘let die’

Lyndsey Stonebridge@lyndseystonebri.bsky.social · last mo.

In the 2022 European heatwave it was estimated (in Nature) that there were 56% more heat-related deaths in women than men between May & September with a steep incline for women between 65 and 79, and a steeper one still for those over 80. Heat is a feminist issue.

I'm old enough to have read research papers on the impact of air conditioning use on the urban heat island. Heat pumps and traditional AC dump heat from inside buildings to the outside, warming up the outside even more. Most people spend most of their time inside, so AC makes sense 1/

I think this is right, though my guess is most capitalists opposed decarb bc it threatens more public power & regulation, not bc decarb as such is a problem. Ofc some sectors are structurally antagonistic to decarb. But most capitalists can be mobilized to insane ends to resist being told what to do

JW Mason@jwmason.bsky.social · 2mo ago

An idea I've been playing with for a while is that one of the core elements of the political economy of Trumpism is that a critical mass of the US capitalist class decided that decarbonization was not worth the costs to them.

🧵A few times, I've been asked to share the best advice I have ever received. I always give the same answer: "If you go out on a limb, don't saw it off." I got from my father, Michael Klein, back when I was a student journalist. We lost him Wednesday. everloved.com/life-of/mich...

Visit Michael C. Klein's Memorial Website

Take part in remembering Michael C. Klein. Read his obituary, share your own memories, and learn about any funeral details on Ever Loved.

everloved.com

1/ Cuba is out of fuel, strangled by the US fuel chokehold. People are dying, systems are breaking down. This is collective punishment against a people who have done absolutely nothing except live their lives under hard conditions imposed by the US blockade for decades.