Mike Eliason

@holz-bau.bsky.social

climate adaptive social housing developer architect for car-light climate forward cities w/ low carbon + passivhaus buildings, social housing Author, 'Building for People' (Island Press, 12/2024: https://islandpress.org/books/building-people)

This is a masterclass in great urbanism. Mixed-use development, tons of green, wonderful bike infrastructure, and even some space for the car. It's a shame that so many developments are mediocre when such beautiful examples exist. 📍Little C, Rotterdam

Bild

'Then there’s tax of moving to distant, affordable suburbs or taking out big mortgages: More debt, longer commutes, more maintenance & less time for socializing & exercise, among other trade-offs. We can end up, Rojas said, overworked & under-relating.' yep! www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...

Column | Why smaller houses can lead to happier lives

It turns out asking “Are you happy with your home?” yields a very different answer than “Are you happy with your life?”

washingtonpost.com

Wow, the article starts off straight away by highlighting the already - crystal clear - dead end we find ourselves in. With energy efficiency measures and conventional materials alone, it blows the budget (with it, our climate). Note that in the SMART pathway, new con fades out & reno takes over.

Abstract
The European Union aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent by 2030 relative to 1990 and achieve climate neutrality by 2050. Yet, translating these targets into pathways for buildings and construction is challenging across diverse national contexts. We model building stocks for the twenty-seven Member States of the European Union and evaluate 4096 life cycle emissions scenarios, considering national capacities. Here we show that, over 2020–2050, achieving these targets would require avoiding 8.53 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, approximately ten years of emissions at 2020 levels. Mostly relying on improving energy efficiency and material production would exceed national capacities by 2.72-billion-ton, 32 percent of the required reduction. A combined approach that also reduces per capita space demand, applies circularity measures, and uses bio‑based materials could achieve an additional 2.19 billion tons within national capacities. For each country, we identify the strategies that maximize projected reductions to inform policy design.3 pathways, named HOPE, COPE, SMART
Martin Röck@martinroeck.com · 10h ago

🎉 New article @nature.com! Ever wondered how the European Union can effectively reduce and remove life cycle #emissions of building construction and operation and reach its #climate targets across Member States? Check this out! 👇 Available #OpenAccess - Free download via: doi.org/10.1038/s414...

New article: Context-specific life cycle emissions pathways for EU buildings and construction - Screenshot of the abstract and first page

Musk proving that his ability to turn his own company's stock downward while he speaks during an earnings call is durable beyond Tesla

Bild

Beef is the top single cause of deforestation globally, by far. Next come oilseeds, especially soy and palm, but the vast majority of those is fed to livestock - chicken, pigs, dairy cows. We can't have our planet and eat it! We urgently need to shift diets away from animal-based foods.

Our World in Data@ourworldindata.org · 2d ago

The largest cause of deforestation is, and has been, the expansion of farmland. But the production of which products, in particular, has been driving this in recent decades? A recent study, published in Nature Food by Chandrakant Singh and Martin Persson, answered this question.