Lord Yorch il Dottore

@amasamune54.bsky.social

Arqueólogo. Petrista neofeudal. A veces hablo de #arqueología y #medieval

Urbagestión Desarrollo e Inversión SL, también llamado Urbagesa. Sus administradores son Ricardo Alonso Fernández y Fernando Alonso Fuentes. Os doy los nombres porque todos conocemos a Maricarmen pero parece que a los medios les cuesta hablar de los que están detrás de este desahucio.

elDiario.es@eldiario.es · last wk.

Enorme despliegue policial en Madrid para que un fondo de inversión pueda desahuciar a Maricarmen www.eldiario.es/madrid/somos...

Pichi desapareceu onte na zona de Panasqueira, no Milladoiro. Se o ves ou cres que o viches, avísanos a nôs ou ao telf 615015000. Calquera información, por pequena que pareza, pode ser decisiva para que poida volver á casa. 🙏 Axúdanos compartindo esta publicación.

Bild

🐾 URXENTE Esta gatiña vive nunha colonia na Coruña. Non se chegou a tempo para esterilizala e está a piques de ter a camada. Non teñen sitio para ela e non pode parir na rúa. Precisa con urxencia unha casa de acollida ata que teña os gatiños e poidan saír adiante para buscarlles adopción.

Bild

So, sorry but not enough… my boycott stands. Because even with the current actions, there will be no actual consequences to the damage made, nor reparations for those who suffered this most. NOT EVEN AN APOLOGY (even a fake one).

Bild

Also, pressing members with different roles in the association’s structure since August whenever they shown a critical position, forcing several resignations… an unacceptable authoritarian behaviour, to be added to the dragging out of many procedures (AAHC, TEA, SC…). ->

It still angers me that after months demanding an APOLOGY for the actions during Belgrade, we did not get any yet… this is an absolute lack of accountability and guilt. For me, this was (and remains to be) the main issue here, and my reading of this is even darker. ->

🚨EAA per rollam vote results🚨 For anyone who doesn't want to trawl through a long document to find the results, I've compiled them here. Well done to everyone who voted for demonstrating strongly and clearly that change is needed 👏🏼👏🏼

Motion A: 468 members agreed to exclude Israeli institutional affiliations = 67%
237 did not agree; 77 abstained

Motion B: 470 members did not approve of the actions of the Exexcutive Board = 79%
124 did approve; 205 abstained

Motion C: 564 members supported a firm statement condemning the ongoing genocide in Palestine = 78%
160 did not support; 76 abstained 

Motion D: 410 supported change in statutes to ptovide mechanism to remove President and Executive Board = 58%
294 did not support; 95 abstained

Motion E: 451 supported a vote on the viability of the current Officers (excl. Treasurer) = 67%
223 did not support; 125 abstained

I have added the following to my original complaint. I'm posting this because it feels important that EAA members understand the extent of what is happening as so much of it is behind closed doors. Names redacted (the irony!) because I feel forced to do so while the evidence is being withheld.

"I am also concerned about the process and decisions behind the production of the minutes of the meeting on 09.01.2026. XXX's comments about me have been redacted (point XX). I was not consulted about this redaction. Had I been consulted, I would have requested that his comments about me were displayed in full as this would provide members with a full and accurate account of the behaviour of Prof. XXX at the meeting. As the minutes currently stand, they remove the evidence of his behaviour, thus not only protecting Prof. XXX, but also further impinging on my agency in this matter. The redaction, therefore, feels like a further attempt at silencing and obfuscation from the Executive."
Zena Kamash@zenakamash.bsky.social · 9mo ago

Following yesterday's EAA Special Meeting, I have submitted a complaint to the EAA Appeal and Anti-Harassment Committee. I post it here, with names redacted, for any members who were not present. Thank you so much to everyone who has reached out with messages of solidarity and support 🙏💓🙏

In spite of the Safe Space Policy being clearly stated at the beginning of the meeting, Prof. XXXXX targeted me by name, calling for my resignation from my position as Editor of the society's journal. Furthermore, his misuse of my title, referring to me as "Miss Kamash", felt deliberately demeaning. This intimidating behaviour explicitly contravenes the EAA Safe Space Policy. Although he was muted, for which I was grateful, I experienced a panic attack following his comments and did not feel safe to speak for the remainder of the meeting. This was further compounded by not only Prof. XXXXX being allowed to remain in the online meeting, but also being invited to take the floor again after the break. This gives me strong concerns about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy.

On a broader point about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy, I also note that members whose position aligned with that of Concerned EAA were repeatedly and persistently accused of anti-Semitism throughout the meeting. This is a serious accusation that should not be levelled without due care and evidentiary support. Its use as a blanket accusation seems to have been designed with the explicit aim of silencing and intimidating members aligned with Concerned EAA, which again contravenes the Safe Space Policy and should have been dealt with more robustly during the meeting.

Following yesterday's EAA Special Meeting, I have submitted a complaint to the EAA Appeal and Anti-Harassment Committee. I post it here, with names redacted, for any members who were not present. Thank you so much to everyone who has reached out with messages of solidarity and support 🙏💓🙏

In spite of the Safe Space Policy being clearly stated at the beginning of the meeting, Prof. XXXXX targeted me by name, calling for my resignation from my position as Editor of the society's journal. Furthermore, his misuse of my title, referring to me as "Miss Kamash", felt deliberately demeaning. This intimidating behaviour explicitly contravenes the EAA Safe Space Policy. Although he was muted, for which I was grateful, I experienced a panic attack following his comments and did not feel safe to speak for the remainder of the meeting. This was further compounded by not only Prof. XXXXX being allowed to remain in the online meeting, but also being invited to take the floor again after the break. This gives me strong concerns about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy.

On a broader point about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy, I also note that members whose position aligned with that of Concerned EAA were repeatedly and persistently accused of anti-Semitism throughout the meeting. This is a serious accusation that should not be levelled without due care and evidentiary support. Its use as a blanket accusation seems to have been designed with the explicit aim of silencing and intimidating members aligned with Concerned EAA, which again contravenes the Safe Space Policy and should have been dealt with more robustly during the meeting.