Anna Smith

@anna-phd.bsky.social

writing | tech & new media | learning theory | lead co-editor @lrtmp.bsky.social | 25-26 Provost Fellow | initiating member @EduNowLab.bsky.social | Past Exec B NCRLL | Past Chair AERA @writinglit.bsky.social‬

Might anyone know of a small, non-intimidating zine-y guidebook that helps folks navigate the logistics (+ ethics) of *collaborative* publication — demystifying the design + production process; explaining formatting + rights clearances; addressing mutual accountability + collaborative review, etc.?

Why Self-Publish Under Fascism?

This publication was prompted by an invitation from Mariame Kaba to join her in a discussion titled: Why Make Zines in 2025: Information Control Under Fascism

halfletterpress.com

I wonder if students today would be less likely to lean on AI for writing assignments if schools had made sure they could touch-type (at least 60wpm) before having them submit all their assignments online. 1/🧵

Anyway, your problem isn‘t finding the time to take notes. The problem is that taking notes is thinking and thinking has to be done by someone. women have been doing a lot of metacognition that looks like a task when it’s really thinking.

Then they have all the transcripts (and the ai token bill) but no sensemaking. so they make another app — a layer that will make sense of all the useless transcripts. But of course sensemaking isnt just pattern spotting. It’s interpretation. AI cannot do either because AI cannot be curious

So a masculinist understanding of notetaking would think a transcription app is the same as taking notes. That’s why they think an AI transcript is a time-saver. They think the notes are the thinking because when a human takes the notes, it is.

I like this notetaking example. it is a good case of how gender works. Notetaking has never been about producing a transcript. It is a bureaucratic skill in the 20th c. organixarion because it is SENSEMAKING. Those women socialized to take notes? They have been doing men’s metacognition for them

Jennifer Romig @jennifermromig.bsky.social · 4d ago

Notetaking in meetings is tiny case in point - used to be some predictable social assumptions who would do it; now anyone can offer to do ”notetaking” by turning on the AI listener. Further interesting scenario is human recollection / notes (taken by habit by a person) conflict with AI summary

I’ve never seen this site so focused on one thing and I have to say, I kind of love it. It’s been a long time since I’ve experienced a watch party on social media. I’ve missed it!

Two years ago, my colleagues and I were sued by Stephen Miller's America First Legal. The Hines v Stamos case — built atop a number of false allegations — was a central element of the "censorship industrial complex" myth. Today, that case was dismissed (by a Trump judge in LA). We won.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JILL HINES ET AL — CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00571
VERSUS — JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY
ALEX STAMOS ET AL — MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
MEMORANDUM RULING
Before the Court is a Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter and Personal Jurisdiction [Doc. No. 191] filed by Defendants, Alex Stamos, Renée DiResta, the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, the Leland Stanford Junior University, Kate Starbird, Graphika, Camille François, the Atlantic Council, and Graham Brookie (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs, Jill Hines ("Hines") and Jim Hoft ("Hoft") (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed an Opposition [Doc. No. 207]. Defendants then filed a Reply [Doc. No. 209].
For the reasons set forth, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

Paper I just reviewed was this—“pristine but dead.” I couldn’t figure out how to explain it. And though it had a “so what,” it was so banal and repeated throughout with no development across the argument. But there…in all the places it was supposed to be. It said nothing. Just “pristine but dead.”

Ben Williamson@benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 2mo ago

More and more, submissions follow template-like formats, with 3- or 4-part frameworks, numbered major findings, and bullet point-like lists of conclusions and implications. The text is pristine but dead. It reads like prose but feels uncanny like those human-like robots somehow. 3/

This is going to be so fun! Share with your educator friends in Illinois and the midwest...unless they want to fly in ;)

Education Now Lab@edunowlab.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Join us for Reignite! A Summer Institute for Innovative Teaching & Learning on from 10:00-3:00 on July 16 and 17, 2026 at @illinoisstateu.bsky.social Registration: $30/person; includes two lunches and 10 PD hours; Space is limited to 100 participants. REGISTER TODAY @ tinyurl.com/ISUReignite

Reconnect. Renew. Reignite your teaching.
Join us for a two-day summer institute designed to help you reconnect with your purpose, rediscover what energizes your teaching, and connect with a community of educators committed to meaningful, innovative practice.

Respectfully, some of you NEED less time online. Your thing will help. Go make it. And if you're not the making-thing type? Volunteer to girdle invasive trees at your local nature center. Teach knitting at the fiber arts collective. Learn to make kimchi and give it away to friends.

Now is the time to make your thing. Stop motion with LEGO, webcomic, walking sim game, weird Halloween costume, backyard water feature, container garden. This is your sign. Make your thing. Stop waiting. Do it.

Folks in English and/or Rhet/Comp: I want to read from those fields and organize a syllabus-esque doc that I share with current classroom English teachers to (re)visit that land they likely left after graduation. What books should I read? I don't want books about teaching ELA or literacy.

I really thought American Vandal had maxed out its niche, but a LOT of new listeners finding us this week. Thanks, avaricious EdTech investors, I guess. If you’re new to AV, & you enjoyed “The Secret History of Canvas,” here are a few episodes you might want to check out next… 🧵

Bild
Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social · 3mo ago

A very long but essential listen if you have anything to do with higher education in the age of AI. Sobering and illuminating in equal part. (And if your marking is currently immobilised on Canvas, also deeply pertinent). Many thanks to @benpatrickwill.bsky.social for highlighting it.