Annika Bärwald

@annikabaerwald.bsky.social

Historian & teacher | PostDoc at the University of Lucerne, early modern hair | PhD'ing in Bremen, slavery and people of color in Hamburg | banner: Tariq Safieh

Delighted to put together this curated collection for French Historical Studies, enhancing our recent INCARCERATION special issue with these fantastic articles from the archive – all deal with issues of race and the carceral in French history @sfhs.bsky.social 🗃️ @hfrancewebsite.bsky.social

Incarceration and Race | French Historical Studies | Duke University Press

This curated collection presents an opportunity to showcase French Historical Studies articles that treat questions of race and incarceration in French his

read.dukeupress.edu

Jetzt wird die Sarrazin-Geschichte offenbar neu geschrieben: Zum neueren Rechtsruck/Zur Faschisierung gehört, dass ihre vormaligen (und ja immer nur zur Hälfte) diskreditierten "Vordenker" rehabilitiert und rückwirkend anerkannt werden, damit es in der Gegenwart ideologisch auch wieder passt.

Roland Meyer@bildoperationen.bsky.social · 6d ago

Die ZEIT entschuldigt sich bei Thilo Sarrazin, dass sie damals seine eugenischen Auslassungen kritisch kommentiert hat, sowas komme nicht wieder vor, schliesslich seien die Erkenntnisse der Rassenhygiene ja jetzt der allgemein anerkannte Forschungsstand, sorry nochmal #Faschisierung

Reminder that the deadline for Birkbeck's Access to Postgraduate Study Scholarships is 31 July. A great scheme for studying on a master's degree programme at an ace institution. Wide range of eligibility criteria (see next post). Do encourage eligible applicants (or apply yourself). 1/2

Birkbeck Access to Postgraduate Study Scholarship - Birkbeck, University of London

The Birkbeck Access to Postgraduate Study Scholarships offer funding towards tuition fees for full-time and part-time taught postgraduate courses.

bbk.ac.uk

We are hiring a new Editorial Fellow who specialises in pre-1800 CE history from any part of the globe 🌍 👉 this 2-year fellowship runs from October 2026 - September 2028 👉 this role is paid and part-time (3 hours per week) 👉 the application deadline is Friday 7 August Please share widely!

Call for Applications: Editorial Fellowship at History Workshop, 2026

History Workshop is seeking to appoint one Editorial Fellow in 2026, with specialism in pre-1800 CE history from any part of the globe.

historyworkshop.org.uk

'The longer I have spent in this field, the more convinced I have become that much of the research culture activity that helps individuals navigate and survive harmful institutional systems may inadvertently help those systems survive, too. I call this the paradox of “compensatory culture work.”'

Some research culture work may be sustaining the practices it seeks to change

Hanna Groothuizen explains the paradox of compensatory culture work, arguing that efforts to improve research culture can make harmful systems easier to endure and harder to reform Hanna Groothuizen e...

wonkhe.com

Really pleased to share my (open access!) article on immigration control in early modern England, feat. rights-bearing subjects, rightsless migrants, and experiments in immigration control

The Historical Journal@historicaljnl.bsky.social · 4mo ago

📣Out now on #firstview Kathleen Commons @kabcommons.bsky.social @sheffielduni.bsky.social on 'Discovering ‘Immigration Control’ in England, c. 1540 – c. 1640' #Migration #History #EarlyModern #England #Immigration 📜 16thc 17thc 👉Read open access here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

Migration history is a growing field – yet the legal status of migrants in early modern England has not yet been investigated in detail. Reconstructing the legal system that governed migrants in early modern England does not just add significant depth and nuance to histories of migration and migrants, but also provides fresh insight into the status of English subjects. Furthermore, it enables historians to trace longer histories of the exclusion of migrants from rights in England and Britain. This article reconstructs the common law governance of migrants between c. 1540 and c. 1640, showing how common law principles and practices excluded migrants from the rights-bearing status of English subjects. Rather than being governed by the law, migrants were substantively governed under prerogative, a form of governance repeatedly resisted by English subjects. Although some migrants could access (unstable) liberties granted under prerogative, for the most part migrants were also subject to discriminatory local byelaws and licences and commissions granted by the crown for their exploitation. The repeated ‘molestation’ of migrants by informers for working contrary to statute, and petitions against this harassment from migrants suggest this early modern system of immigration control was relatively well understood by both subjects and migrants.