a good craftsperson never blames their tools, they blame their workspace
measure twice, check the cad file thrice, measure again to be sure, cut once, redesign in cad to handle the slight miscut
This is and has always been the point of patriarchy: barring women from access to resources so we can only get them through men. So that men who would otherwise never be chosen by women can coerce women into relationships. Patriarchy has always been affirmative action for shitty men.
The conservative solution for the “male loneliness epidemic” and decentering men is to just remove women from public spaces.
I've been trying to formulate this for a while: A system trained to human judgment doesn't just inherit the limits of human understanding, it's punished for exceeding them.
given the input conditions and infinite iterations, you'd still need a loss function, which will always be based on our limited understanding of the concept. if training produces output outside our understanding it is penalized, so it only learns to mirror our limited understanding.
a real mouse brain runs on roughly 250 mW which is at least 10,000x more efficient
And that sentence continues "by some measures a few are already in the range of a mouse brain, and at recent growth rates, they could reach the range of a human brain within five to 10 years." Uhh --- what are those measures, exactly? >>
The creator of Roger Rabbit (who is 85 years old by the way) is a good sort Crossposted with @openvibe.social
fox seems to be covering data center protests extensively, which means this is a stunt to let the tech bros break their sham spending commitments and blame liberals when it all implodes the economy
i can make booze, i can cook, i can make ovens, i can generate power and make clean water, i can fix anything, i can make tools, build furniture and houses. i have spent my life preparing for this.
Every day something new And 1000% agree... we all have to get ACTIVE and figure out what we are going to do in the absence of systems and protections we took for granted Makes me think of a question that came up when I was reading Parable of the Sower... "what's your post-apocalyptic skill????"
yes but Title IX is about a lot more than sports and I'm not really seeing that anywhere.
My god. The Heritage Foundation, which mercilessly attacked transgender kids in order to protect the "integrity of women's sports," is now attacking the legal basis for women's sports. The transgender student decision is barely 2 weeks old.
when you tell us that the people who murdered comity and civility—who are trying to kill and rob and enslave us—are actually your dear friends, you don’t create civility, but despair; we see you don’t actually believe the danger is real, can’t be trusted to fight the battle that needs to be fought.
"The great Powers with their Colonial responsibilities cannot afford to neglect any opportunity of increasing the knowledge of such practical eugenic questions." fucking sucks we have to fight all this bullshit 100 years later
every new detail I find about my great grandfather places him at some consequential and bizarre historical event. ratted out by little augie during the MKUltra prototype? sure why not
none of this is a problem for me, but will there be a 22 minute internet delay?
Inside the habitats crews will: • Grow their own food • Perform simulated spacewalks • Operate rovers • Monitor their own health • Live on Mars time, roughly 40 minutes longer than an Earth day
why are they called intellectual property laws and not the statutes of imitations
I've been trying to formulate this for a while: A system trained to human judgment doesn't just inherit the limits of human understanding, it's punished for exceeding them.
given the input conditions and infinite iterations, you'd still need a loss function, which will always be based on our limited understanding of the concept. if training produces output outside our understanding it is penalized, so it only learns to mirror our limited understanding.
I believe a desire to steer into masculinity as some kind of curative answer for previous political failures delivered us to this moment, and honestly, it could deliver us to much worse.
But by the time Klippenstein was out here calling less messy and masculine candidates "smooth groined," perhaps folks should have questioned the energy behind all of this, what was being normalized, and to what end. That's all I am asking for now—that people question what they got wrapped up in.
Like no sorry actually there are a lot of women in the working class and also a lot of men who are not fucking assholes. The working class is not the cultural and moral lowest common denominator and the fact that you imagine it as such tells us exactly what your politics actually are
LLMs have a long way to go. They think articles about eating rocks are legitimate while treating real news, like Alex Jones's head spontaneously popping in the driver's seat of *a* van (we don't know who owned the van) is satire. Credibly comes when it can reason from a set of basic facts.
an LLM is not credible if it doesn't know that Alex Jones has died from some kind of bizarre head explosion alone in the drivers seat of his parked van
here's what it meant for the stock
SpaceX joins the Nasdaq-100 on Tuesday. Here's what it means for the stock
perception aint what it used to be, these are two of the top perceivers on this whole web page
See, the thing about "risking it" is you're actually just handing a massive wedge to the GOP. Are you still ok with it, Dr. Perception?
the idea of the nazi bar has become completely detached from the original context, and people now believe you only get a nazi bar when a nazi buys the bar.