Critics of the AAUP endorsement can’t decide if endorsements are bad because of political neutrality or if this endorsement is bad because they don’t like the candidate, just like they can’t decide whether academia should be apolitical or should actively bring in conservatives
Chris Maggio
@chrisjmaggio.bsky.social
Assistant Professor studying immigration at Mercy University https://www.chris-maggio.com https://mercy.edu/directory/christopher-maggio
This feeds into another point that I think is lost in this conversation, which is that political beliefs are not inherent characteristics, but particularly in the case of academics, often positions that emerge from evidence
Kwame Anthony Appiah, who is an author on the Vanderbilt Report, wrote thoughtfully about cosmopolitanism, but to say he’s not politically biased in favor of cosmopolitanism is preposterous
One thing I don’t understand is the heavy involvement of philosophers in these claims of bias. Am I really to understand that, in making their various arguments that rely invariably on subjective interpretation, these philosophers are exhibiting no political bias?
Has anyone laid out a good case for 1) what is the actual problem with academia we are trying to solve regarding viewpoint diversity, 2) why it is important to solve this problem, and 3) how we should solve it, providing evidence to support all 3?
Not the first of this type of study these authors have put out btw
New meta-analytic study looking at 114 field experiments on hiring discrimination, probably the majority of which have sociologist authors. Completely flies in the face of this claim from the WSJ article academic.oup.com/sf/advance-a...
New meta-analytic study looking at 114 field experiments on hiring discrimination, probably the majority of which have sociologist authors. Completely flies in the face of this claim from the WSJ article academic.oup.com/sf/advance-a...
The racialized penalties of immigrant origin: meta-analytic evidence on hiring discrimination in twelve countries
Abstract. The role of discrimination in shaping the life chances of immigrants and their descendants is central to debates in the sociology of immigration.
academic.oup.com
This is false. There is a huge amount of scholarship using experimental methods to study discrimination in sociology, and I would even argue that that type of methodology has become *more* favored in the field in the past 10 years
A provocation from behind a paywall but Chris gives a flavour. #Sociology certainly has problems but this seems so badly researched and so inaccurate that it’s really just another anti-woke hit job.
Thoughts on this article
This is a masked ICE agent in upper Manhattan today. He walked up to a woman simply recording and pepper-sprayed her in the face. Watch the video. 👇
ICE in Inwood, NY
My paper is out today in PNAS documenting how ICE activity in Trump 2.0 compares to the last 10 years and the mismatch between the action and the rhetoric. Joint with the fabulous @caitlinpatler.bsky.social and @elizabethacox.bsky.social www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Have any of the people supposedly defending objectivity in academia spoken out against this fallacious article? So far I’ve only seen them wholeheartedly or tacitly supporting it
Overall, so many falsehoods, misrepresentations, and faulty assumptions in this article made by people who claim to be white knighting for “truth.” Embarrassing
One thing the viewpoint diversity people seem to be getting mixed up is whether they want a completely objective, apolitical academia, or they expressly want more conservatives in academia
According to this analysis the retraction rate of computer science articles stands out against all other fields. The authors point out there could be a variety of reasons for that, but interestingly I’ve seen no calls to liquidate computer science
The Retraction Epidemic in Science Across Publishers, Fields, and Countries
arxiv.org
One reason I don’t really care if academics represent the views of the public is that students are already exposed to the views of the public- college is a place where they can learn to question those views, whether they end up changing their mind or not
The people uncritically promoting this article seem pretty comfortable pushing a bunch of inaccurate claims because they support their political agenda- sounds awfully familiar
Overall, so many falsehoods, misrepresentations, and faulty assumptions in this article made by people who claim to be white knighting for “truth.” Embarrassing
If you block me on social media for respectfully challenging your claims you don’t get to talk about viewpoint diversity ever again
Someone allegedly promoting diversity of thought on X and who I have had many pleasant interactions with has blocked me because I politely disagreed with him. Hope he at least sees the irony
Someone allegedly promoting diversity of thought on X and who I have had many pleasant interactions with has blocked me because I politely disagreed with him. Hope he at least sees the irony
In the past two weeks, Trump has recorded his lowest-ever approval ratings from whites without college degrees, across either term as president. yougov.com/en-us/articl...
This, of course, also assumes that quantitative methodology is inherently superior. I use these methods in almost all of my work but the idea that we can have a more complete understanding of the social world without qualitative methods is ridiculous
In what universe is sociology not using cutting edge methodology? This is a complete misrepresentation
The people promoting “viewpoint diversity” are saying we should liquidate an entire discipline because they don’t like its viewpoint
This is crucial and often unmentioned. Almost every single diagnosis of declining faith in universities fails to mention that it is runs in parallel to declining faith in almost all American institutions. Any failure to recognize this means it is really flawed or not a serious effort.
👇🎯 The tell about this is that none of these people claiming academia had a trust problem benchmark universities to other societal institutions or spend any time banging on about the problems with those institutions: bsky.app/profile/mcop...
Americans have more confidence in higher education than in big tech companies, and the gap is growing rather than shrinking. The higher ed-doomsday pundits need to get on board with the real vibe shift in public trust that is happening right now.
I look forward to all the reports & coverage about all of the internal problems & mistakes of all of these other institutions, in the same way that universities are constantly blamed (& blaming themselves) for “declining trust.” “Compared to what?” news.gallup.com/poll/712436/...
I look forward to all the reports & coverage about all of the internal problems & mistakes of all of these other institutions, in the same way that universities are constantly blamed (& blaming themselves) for “declining trust.” “Compared to what?” news.gallup.com/poll/712436/...
“Compared to what?” is always the essential question when asking about critiques of higher education & universities, whether we’re discussing declining trust, freedom of speech, viewpoint diversity, or any of the other things.
Trump looked at Venezuela, where a regime figure conducted an internal coup with US assistance, thought “actually, I did that” and decided he could easily conduct regime change anywhere on earth. A war caused by him being a blithering idiot.
“.. once confident that overwhelming force would enable him to pursue in Iran what he proudly called the ‘Venezuela model’.., he has discovered limits on his power that he could have scarcely imagined as he began full combat operations ..” @sangernyt.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/u...
The idea that you are among small number of serious thinkers in an entire field is so narcissistic and anti-social it really makes you wonder what the purpose of all this is
What if sociologists thought deeply and just landed on emancipation and social justice as important? Why would this be difficult to believe, unless you are so arrogant that you think you are one of the only “deep thinkers” in the field
I normally spend more time critiquing sociology than defending it but this is just a parade of bs that does not get at any of the actual issues in the discipline
Overall, so many falsehoods, misrepresentations, and faulty assumptions in this article made by people who claim to be white knighting for “truth.” Embarrassing
Overall, so many falsehoods, misrepresentations, and faulty assumptions in this article made by people who claim to be white knighting for “truth.” Embarrassing
Thoughts on this article
What if sociologists thought deeply and just landed on emancipation and social justice as important? Why would this be difficult to believe, unless you are so arrogant that you think you are one of the only “deep thinkers” in the field
Should someone be discriminated against in academia due to their identity? No. Should someone be “discriminated” against in academia due to their viewpoint? It depends, and we all know it depends, because there are lines many conservatives would draw as well