Daphne Halikiopoulou

@dafnoukos.bsky.social

Chair in Comparative Politics, University of York Research on far right, populism, nationalism and European Politics Joint Editor-In-Chief of Nations and Nationalism, Political Studies Steering Committee ECPR Extremism&Democracy LSE PhD

Are you looking for a good home for your research on the dynamics of #farright mobilisation and its implications for democracy? Look no further than this call 📣 We're particularly interested in innovative theoretical and empirical studies that critically engage with the radical–extreme distinction

Far-right mobilisation and democratic transformation

This Humanities and Social Sciences Communications Collection examines the contemporary dynamics of far-right mobilisation and its implications for democracy. ...

nature.com

M. Dilling and L. de Jonge. “Democratic Dissatisfaction, the Far Right, and Party Brand Activation: Lessons From the Breakthrough (And Downfall) of The Dutch New Social Contract”. In: Political Research Exchange 8.1 (2026), p. 2641720. dx.doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2026.2641720.

Our article is now available Open Access! We hope our typology is useful to study national teams (in all sports) and to further reflect on globalization effects on modern football. The 2026 MAGA World Cup sees a further decline in "ethnic" national teams and a sharp rise in "diaspora" teams.

Bild

In our new paper for @ejprjournal.bsky.social Tim Vlandas and I offer a mathematical statement and simulations to assess the extent of the 'atomistic' fallacy on #VotingBehaviour, and illustrate the problem empirically by focusing on the example of #FarRight voting- available below Open Access

European Journal of Political Research@ejprjournal.bsky.social · 2mo ago

So you think you know? 💬 🧑‍🔬 @dafnoukos.bsky.social & @ox.ac.uk's Tim Vlandas offer a mathematical statement and simulations to assess the extent of the 'atomistic' fallacy on #VotingBehaviour, and the issues with using European Social Survey data on #FarRight voting

Why knowing who is more likely to vote for a political party doesn't necessarily explain the party's overall electoral success- our new paper with Tim Vlandas out in @ejprjournal.bsky.social

Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR@cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 2mo ago

#OpenAccess from @ejprjournal.bsky.social - The (forgotten) atomistic fallacy in political science and its implications for how we interpret elections - https://cup.org/3RyKLSe - Tim Vlandas & @dafnoukos.bsky.social #FirstView

Logo for the European Journal of Political Research displaying the text "EJPR European Journal of Political Research" in cream letters on a blue background, accompanied by the hashtag "#OpenAccess".

Knowing who is likely to vote for a party doesn’t explain a party’s success. Better data and methods doesn't negate the risks of drawing conclusions from individual-level findings on the interpretation of elections, write Tim Vlandas and @dafnoukos.bsky.social write on @lseeuroppblog.bsky.social

Why knowing who is likely to vote for a party doesn’t explain a party’s success

Drawing conclusions about electoral outcomes from individual-level findings about who is likely to vote for a party risks distorting how we interpret elections.

blogs.lse.ac.uk

The #RadicalRight in France, Germany, the US, the Netherlands, and Sweden: T. Vlandas and D. Halikiopoulou. “Jihadist Terrorist Attacks and Far-Right Party Preferences: An "Unexpected Event During Survey Design" in Four European Countries”. In: Perspectives on Politics online

a decorative image (abstract, wordcloud, or summary) illustrating this reference

Sure, never judge a book by its cover, but after three years of working on it, today I was moved to finally see the cover of my forthcoming book, featuring a painting by my late father in law, Paul Lysaker 🙏

Bild