Daniel Schlozman

@daschloz.bsky.social

Political scientist (at Johns Hopkins) and political button collector.

Everybody has claimed--sometimes convincingly, sometimes not--to have the Democratic Party's best interests at heart in this mess. But for Platner to behave like this right now is pure selfish hostage-taking. And good on the state party ED to speak up on the party's behalf.

TrumpsTaxes@trumpstaxes.com · 4w ago

Wow, this message from the Maine Democrats account on X. It sounds like Graham Platner is trying to stay actively involved in the process to replace him…and maybe even play kingmaker. And apparently Maine Dems are NOT having it.

A convention would be a much better, and dare I say, fairer process than either letting Platner pass the factional baton or deciding that it's time for a different faction to have its turn. Very midcentury reform liberal in a good way. www.bangordailynews.com/2026/07/07/p...

Maine Democrats work ‘around the clock’ on process to replace Graham Platner

“The eyes of the nation are on us,” Maine Democrats’ executive director Devon Murphy-Anderson said in a letter to state committee party members Tuesday.

bangordailynews.com

Statements from Dems like this one make it harder to press for Supreme Court reform. This ruling was a near-disaster and shows how unhinged SCOTUS has become—now just one vote away from overturning the 14th Amendment. But a sitting senator says they "applaud" the ruling.

BREAKING: Rosen Applauds Supreme Court Decision Protecting Birthright Citizenship

 

WASHINGTON, DC - Today, U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) issued a statement applauding the Supreme Court’s decision in the Trump vs. Barbara case, striking down Donald Trump’s unconstitutional attempt to take away citizenship from children born in the U.S. 

 

“It has always been clear: a child born in the United States is an American citizen,” said Senator Rosen. “I applaud the Supreme Court’s decision today to defend the U.S. Constitution and honor the right to automatic citizenship for all U.S.-born children. Today’s decision also makes clear that Donald Trump is not above the law, and he cannot unilaterally take away anyone’s constitutional rights.”

 

Senator Rosen has led Congressional efforts to protect citizenship for children born in the U.S. In February, Senator Rosen led an amicus brief in Trump vs. Barbara, demanding the protection of birthright citizenship as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Last year, she led Senate colleagues in introducing the Born in the USA Act, which would effectively block the implementation of President Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order attempting to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States.

Compare Alito's description of Trump's racist statements (on the left) to Justice Kagan's anthology of Trump's racist statements (on the right). These are passages from this morning's opinions in Mullin v. Doe.

BildBild

To make a Hollow Parties-esque point: Platner emerged not from an actual party faction committed to social democracy and/or beating Susan Collins but individual actors who gain big if he wins but see little difference in their fortunes if he drops now or loses in November.

Targeting immigrant Islanders instills a culture of fear and disrupts the stability of our region just as we are preparing to welcome scores of visitors. No one should live in fear or be uprooted without cause and due process.

Island Father and Teenage Son Taken into ICE Custody

An Island worker and his teenage son who were out fishing off Menemsha this week were detained by the U.S. Coast Guard and transferred to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilit...

vineyardgazette.com

I am pretty confused why bsky is so mad about this. Establishing "neutral" rules of districting would require federal anti gerrymandering reform. This isn't saying things are ok without that reform. It's saying reform structured in anti-partisan ways would have more or less racially fair effects

The Upshot@upshot.nytimes.com · 3mo ago

Our simulations show that the act isn’t needed for minority representation in the South, if partisan gerrymandering were checked. www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/u...

Just to add to this really excellent piece, in searching for institutional lessons from past moments of possibility, Reconstruction is far more useful than either the New Deal, when Congress was under segregationists' thumb, or the 1960s and the Warren Court's fleeting promise.

Niko Bowie@nikobowie.bsky.social · 3mo ago

By gutting the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court is killing the Second Reconstruction. The first Reconstruction shows how Congress should respond. Me and Daphna Renan in the NYT on the tools we have to save democracy from a hostile Court.

The assault on the VRA is straightforwardly the end of the Second Reconstruction and also occurring alongside the broader Trump-GOP attack on democracy that has taken place amid race depolarization in the electorate.

The 25th Amendment stuff is cope, but it's the first moment in the Trump-Biden-Trump years that members of Congress have stared into the maw of the imperial presidency en masse, and begun to grope toward some Linzian conclusions.