Just This Guy, You Know?

@derekwwade.bsky.social

Systems-thinker, promiscuous collaborator, educator, medi(t)ator, & aviator. Improving the world by improving work by closing the workplace/humanity gap. #BusinessAgility #SeriousGames #Cybernetics. #BirdSiteRefugee. He/him. Also derekwwade@mstdn.io

unironically i think it’s partially bluesky having a poisoned brand among the techies (“wahh its just a leftie twitter”), lack of common knowledge about what atproto is in general, and also that AI sucked all attention in the room

dan@danabra.mov · 2mo ago

i think the biggest missing thing is just a broad understanding of what it is. many developers think of atproto as some weird bluesky thing and have no idea it’s a realistic vision for a better internet that they can already build upon

QuickBooks helped me create a bookkeeping error ~= 20% of my business' net income. Took my accountant and I an hour to figure it out. Convinced QB's durable business requirements include "drive revenue to accountancies via maximum user confusion." Any SMB alternatives that delight you?

This is part 19/27 of a thread about billionaire solipsism. Very worth the read. I think we're seeing this extend downwards into the very senior levels of many smaller companies as well. Important criterion for your investment $ or your hiring: "do the execs see people as humans like them?"

By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)@doctorow.pluralistic.net · 2d ago

We're defective bots whose bothaviors are maddeningly non-deterministic and sub-optimal.

it's just not the case that LLMs can destroy humanity. An LLM cannot (technical sense) do shit. The thing which can damage important systems would be "an executable program, which calls an LLM to determine its behaviour". So, don't write one of those unless you are confident you can control it.

Dare Obasanjo@carnage4life.bsky.social · 2d ago

Dan Selsam, OpenAI researcher, talks about how current AI models are already outsmarting humans and AI researchers are so dependent on AI models for coding or studying AI that it’s trivial for the models to fool researchers into thinking they’re aligned. He also believes they could destroy humanity

But the thing is, many cyberneticians embrace and prioritize play and fantasy, and are even known for predicting the future, with alarming accuracy, and varying levels of getting the timing right. Remind you of anyone? It reminds me of a lot of people. Like, i don’t know, Octavia Butler.

We have an incredible problem: too many donations for our mutual aid hub and not enough shelves! We’ve outgrown our current setup, and we need to adapt to keep up with need, especially as we help candidates across the country adopt this model.

every right-winger calling for all-out war on "The Left," warning that political enemies are about to face their ultimate wrath, said the exact same shit in November and have been enacting that fantasy ever since. unclear why this language should frighten anyone more today

There's an astonishingly "what could it possibly mean?"-coded piece around saying "people who understand more about AI are less likely to want anything to do with it" and I just want to suggest: what if it were sharks?