If you receive an academic grant, the outcome usually takes the shape of a series of scientific papers. But these don't always completely cover the question "so what have you learned?" In my latest blog for the Meta-Research Center, I attempt to answer this question. 🧵
Matti Vuorre
@matti.vuorre.com
I am an associate professor at Tilburg University's Department of Social Psychology. I have a website at https://vuorre.com. All posts are posts.
Only one more week until the launch of the Publish, Review, Curate Alliance! Join us on October 28, 2026, 14:00 – 16:00 GMT for an engaging discussion about one of the most exciting new developments in scholarly publishing in decades! Register! publish-review-curate.org/2026/09/07/l...
Launch Event – Publish, Review, Curate (PRC): Shaping the future of scholarly publishing – Registration now open!
Join us for an engaging discussion about one of the most exciting new developments in scholarly publishing in decades! October 28, 2026 14:00 – 16:00 GMT The scholarly publishing system is un…
publish-review-curate.org
Really nice website. Another great example of what can be done with open data.
So, I made this. Apparently I write long posts here.
PSA If you're going to include a link to your / your project's website in a permanent repository (e.g. a grant website), make sure to buy the domain for at least 10 years so it is not hijacked by an AI adult entertainment company after your project's over. The link will still be there...
This is unexpectedly awesome: Zenodo allows reserving a DOI before depositing the materials, so you can include the DOI in the materials themselves. This is very helpful because you can include the identifier in the metadata itself.
We would like to thank 31 currently active PsyArXiv moderators and the leadership team who volunteer their time and energy to ensure that important psychological research is made available to the research community as quickly as possible. buff.ly/htX5xM0
OSF
buff.ly
On the Consequences of Cognitive Offloading, Experimental Design, and University Press Releases
Oh, that didn't take much digging. They asked people to solve stupid fraction problems. One group got to ask AI, the other group didn't. Then they took the AI away from the AI group. Those people started fucking off. The non-AI group didn't magically know it was time to start fucking off.
Send your best work to PCI Psychology (psych.peercommunityin.org) where it will receive high quality & open peer review free of commercial interference. We review a variety of article types from a wide range of psychological topics (psych.peercommunityin.org/help/help_ge...).
1247 preprints have now received a recommendation from one of the 21 thematic PCI! Behind every recommendation is a community of researchers contributing their expertise. Could your preprint be next? 👉 Submit your research to PCI: peercommunityin.org/submit-a-pre...
"As programming increasingly becomes a caffeinated bender with magical bots, this measured pace and emphasis on communal thinking likely holds an important lesson." Love this piece on the development of Zotero. newsletter.dancohen.org/archive/the-...
The Slow Formation of Durable Software
How a group of historians took years to imagine Zotero, the research application that would eventually be used by millions
newsletter.dancohen.org
So check out this PR from @gordonwoodhull.bsky.social over at Quarto 2. Is that import/export from Word preserving comments? Why yes, yes it is indeed 😮 github.com/quarto-dev/q...
Their pre-registration says they'll use n=848, and they therefore don't do a power analysis. But then in the actual replication they're down to n=224. They then say "This doesn't replicate" because p=0.19. But its directionally similar and they have one-quarter of the sample!
Looks awesome
Excited to be launching our new PhD program in Minds and Machines at UCL with co-Directors Tali Sharot and @nadinedijkstra.bsky.social To apply, find out more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-scienc... Our launch event is on Nov 10th, with a cracking lineup of speakers: luma.com/cikzcth0
link.springer.com/article/10.3...
A beta way: A tutorial on Bayesian beta regression for psychological research - Behavior Research Methods
Rates, percentages, and proportions are common outcomes in psychology and the social sciences. These outcomes are often analyzed using models that assume normality, but this practice overlooks importa...
link.springer.com
Good talk. There's a lot of (over)thinking of this at the moment. Zenodo just works. (Until it doesn't when we and our bots ruin that as well.) Collaborate on GitHub and refer to zenodo.
Gave a talk in my dept. on the OSF transition. I wrote up a rough script of the session, which could be of interest to others. I synthesize existing resources and provide my own perspectives. Comments and corrections welcome! zenodo.org/records/2306...
I do like a good revolution, but here the thoughtful application of established methods seems a more fruitful approach.
Our commentary "A Revolution in Search of an Estimand: On the Idionomic Proposal of Hayes et al. (2026)" is now available as a preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps... With @rpsychologist.com, @matti.vuorre.com, and Nils Hentati Isacsson.
"Replication crisis" reforms like preregistration & pre-analysis plans were developed to control false positives in experimental research. Does that work in observational studies? Our new paper in Sociological Methods & Research argues for a different approach. 🧵 journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
www.reid-lab.org/blog/22 My (interactive) blog post focused on how #EEG #MEG signals are generated. Aimed at anyone interested in learning about these methods on a biophysical level. Let know what you think -- and share if you think it may interest your followers! #neuroscience #Neuroskyence
Learning about EEG (part 1) | Andrew's Blog
This is a teaching-oriented post about the fundamental concepts underlying electroencephalography (EEG), and to some extent magnetoencephalography (MEG). I explore how electromagnetic fields are gener...
reid-lab.org
🥳 I may have finally worked out a way to put a Seinfeld quote into a paper title. S05 The Hamptons.
Super thread on science comms and how a study can 'evolve' over time. As she says "be careful with PRs"
Fun story. As I was a grad student I published a 1st-author paper on co-rumination in J of Adolescence that got discussed in the NYT (side note, the reporter interviewed me but only named my advisor in the story). Our PR office wanted to build on it for more press, so they wrote up a press release…
New paper! Despite qualitative researchers claiming that generalizability is not a goal, their published work does indeed contain generalizable claims. We document this and provide recommendations for how all researchers can better calibrate their generalizability claims. doi.org/10.1177/2515...
Papers I would like to explore: - Against SESOI: More arbitrary thresholds = More arbitrary science - Against value-driven science: open, team, or interdisciplinary science doesn't make your study more valid - Abandon "best practices" and explain your reasoning instead
1. We used a multidimensional cultural distance measure to quantify how culturally different the 41 groups were to the US where the typical hierarchy was first documented. The closer a sample was to the US culturally, the more similar its hierarchy of moral concern.
New beta of #Rstats rig: LOTS of EXCITING stuff: - new: web site: rig.r-lib.org - new: user-mode R installation: rig.r-lib.org/admin-vs-use... - new: manage R packages (CRAN + git): rig.r-lib.org/pkg-guide.html - new: manage R projects and virtual environments: rig.r-lib.org/proj-guide.h...
rig – the R Installation Manager – rig
rig.r-lib.org