Matti Vuorre

@matti.vuorre.com

I am an associate professor at Tilburg University's Department of Social Psychology. I have a website at https://vuorre.com. All posts are posts.

If you receive an academic grant, the outcome usually takes the shape of a series of scientific papers. But these don't always completely cover the question "so what have you learned?" In my latest blog for the Meta-Research Center, I attempt to answer this question. 🧵

PSA If you're going to include a link to your / your project's website in a permanent repository (e.g. a grant website), make sure to buy the domain for at least 10 years so it is not hijacked by an AI adult entertainment company after your project's over. The link will still be there...

This is unexpectedly awesome: Zenodo allows reserving a DOI before depositing the materials, so you can include the DOI in the materials themselves. This is very helpful because you can include the identifier in the metadata itself.

Screenshot of Zenodo indicating "Reserve a DOI by pressing the button (so it can be included in files prior to upload). The DOI is registered when your upload is published."

Their pre-registration says they'll use n=848, and they therefore don't do a power analysis. But then in the actual replication they're down to n=224. They then say "This doesn't replicate" because p=0.19. But its directionally similar and they have one-quarter of the sample!

Bild

www.reid-lab.org/blog/22 My (interactive) blog post focused on how #EEG #MEG signals are generated. Aimed at anyone interested in learning about these methods on a biophysical level. Let know what you think -- and share if you think it may interest your followers! #neuroscience #Neuroskyence

Learning about EEG (part 1) | Andrew's Blog

This is a teaching-oriented post about the fundamental concepts underlying electroencephalography (EEG), and to some extent magnetoencephalography (MEG). I explore how electromagnetic fields are gener...

reid-lab.org

New paper! Despite qualitative researchers claiming that generalizability is not a goal, their published work does indeed contain generalizable claims. We document this and provide recommendations for how all researchers can better calibrate their generalizability claims. doi.org/10.1177/2515...

article header for, "Qualitative Researchers Can and Do Generalize: Generalizability Claims in Qualitative Psychological Research". Metascience!

Papers I would like to explore: - Against SESOI: More arbitrary thresholds = More arbitrary science - Against value-driven science: open, team, or interdisciplinary science doesn't make your study more valid - Abandon "best practices" and explain your reasoning instead

1. We used a multidimensional cultural distance measure to quantify how culturally different the 41 groups were to the US where the typical hierarchy was first documented. The closer a sample was to the US culturally, the more similar its hierarchy of moral concern.

Bild