Milan Markovic

@profmarkovic.bsky.social

Canadian law professor based in the United States. I write about legal ethics, access to justice, and the future of law. My views are not those of my employers.

This is a cousin of one of the most frequent and consequential errors in separation of powers conversations--emphatically including lawyers and law profs. It's not Congress vs the President. It's *the law* vs the President.

I'm teaching Race, Law and US Society, which is on this list and has been deemed "too narrow." Some readings: US Constitution, Federalist Papers, Notes on the State of Virginia, Cherokee Nation Cases, Scott v. Stanford, Brown v Board... so US legal history... too narrow? Or just too about race?

AAUP chapter @UT Austin@utaustinaaup.bsky.social · 5d ago

Chaos and authoritarianism at UT Austin. Faculty have just days to show how their courses meet vague requirements of breadth and foundationalism. Proposals will be reviewed by an unspecified entity. No guarantee at all that those who review the proposals have expertise in the field.

If the administration is planning to disobey a court order, that is at least in part a product of what the Roberts Court has been communicating to the administration over the last year and a half: that the Supreme Court is the only court whose voice matters, and lower courts can be ignored.

Omri Marian@omrimarian.bsky.social · last wk.

You should all read the USPS whistleblower complaint, because it makes clear Trump intends to use the USPS to prevent us all from voting. It is as simple as that. www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/u...

Even if Democrats sweep the midterms and the election in 2028, the diplomatic relationship between Canada and the US is damaged forever. There is no path to recovery from this kind of deep derision, bullying, and toxicity from one of the two main political parties in the US.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · last wk.

EISEN: Markets are wondering if we're in tit for tat trade war w/Canada BESSENT: I don't think you can be in a tit for tat with someone who's 13 times larger than you E: They say they're doing ok B: What else are they gonna say? What are they gonna do? Take their 2 submarines & sic them on us?

I just read a paper in my field that is forthcoming in a fancy law review that nominally incorporates peer review. It's obvious the author / journal did not run it by one legal ethics person. I considered emailing comments, but what it needs is a redo. We need to be thinking more and writing less.

Alexandra Lahav@alahav.bsky.social · last wk.

I disagree. A big reason for bad scholarship is people who aren't thinking. I just saw a paper published in Very Fancy L Rev where there was a logical fallacy in the abstract! Maybe AI doesn't predict logical fallacies? Or maybe it recreates them.

Extraordinary, powerful and heart-wrenching. Active duty Marine Colonel Zach Schmidt, speaking in his personal capacity, about Khalil, an Afghan national whose family helped U.S. forces in Afghanistan. Khalil was deported by the U.S. on Friday to a conflict zone.

Every day you read two headlines, one like "Trump orders U.S. Aircraft Carrier to get him Chik-fil-a" and one like "Hakeem Jeffries: We Must Be Very Cautious in the Way We Consider Speaking About Methods of Bringing About Incremental Change to U.S. Tax Code"

Texas and Florida have already stripped the ABA's accrediting authority while allowing graduates of ABA-accredited schools to sit for the bar. This is separate from the feds' recent actions against the org., which could impact student loans. The ABA is simply in no position to help in TX and FL.

Post nicht verfügbar.