Nicholas Sarwark

@sarwark.org

Self determination advocate. Keeping Phoenix families on the road with Consolidated Auto Sales, educating civic leaders with the Libertarian Policy Foundation, and providing affordable self-defense with the Altor pistol. https://nsarwark.substack.com/

HASSETT: If people were unhappy, it'd show up in the data TAPPER: It seems to be showing up in the data, just not the data you're looking at

The second paragraph is incoherent but so is the first. Young people saying they are focused on making money rather than starting a family is not an example of them casting aside religious values or secular ethics. His mind is dull and his writing is sloppy in both the original and modern sense.

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social · 7h ago

Yglesias has lost his mind. This is not "progressive economic thinking," this is what you see on Twitter. substack.com/@matthewygle...

Impossible to understand how anyone could look at Rufo's career and conclude he was someone engaged in a "forthright defense of meritocracy." Rufo's entire career is built on the idea of purging people who don't think or look like him from positions of power.

Bild
The Atlantic@theatlantic.com · yesterday

A GOP schism over the Texas candidate Bo French’s social-media post reveals the limits of the party’s defense of a color-blind meritocracy, @jonathanbchait.bsky.social argues.

A good student, an athlete, an ROTC member, who came to the US LEGALLY — so humiliated by ICE that he took his own life. His blood is on Donald Trump’s hands. His blood is on the hands of every ICE agent. His blood is on the hands of everyone at DHS.

At Haitian student’s funeral, a community confronts painful immigration reality — Miami Herald

The emotional ceremony held in English and Haitian Creole was attended by his parents and two younger brothers, local community advocates and elected officials including Springfield Mayor Rob Rue, Sta...

apple.news

Your vote is not small to the people spending millions to make sure you never cast it. They know what happens when working people, young people, women, and every fed-up voter show up together. We flip Congress. They lose control. That’s the whole assignment. #BlueWaveIn30Days

Second, it helps pundits sympathetic to Hegseth’s policies rationalize the actions he takes that they find distasteful. They can selectively ignore the bad bits, in favor of the good. 11/

Why might Hegseth be using this tactic? First, it distracts ppl from his ideological messaging; pundits might be inclined to tune out his inflammatory statements and focus on his reasonable-ish policies. 9/

But, while the directive explicitly does not say who to vote for, and fosters an image of nonpartisanship, Hegseth may be counting on these being Republican votes, as the officer corps has long leaned that way (somewhat less so for enlisted). 8/

But, at least for now, the metric for what constitutes “warfighting” is undefined, likely by design. This leaves the services to read the tea leaves abt Hegseth’s intent, yielding lots of potential subjectivity in determining who passes & much room for “lethality” to dominate over other skills. 5/

First, take his Sept. 30 State of the Force speech to service members at Quantico in which he proposed the establishment of a new combatant command for drones/robots/AI and an initiative to study future war. Seems relatively substantive at first glance. 2/ See here: www.wsj.com/politics/nat...

Hegseth Unveils New Command to Oversee Military-Drone Tech

In speech at Marine Corps base, defense secretary also said Elon Musk would help the Pentagon study the future of warfare.

wsj.com

With Hegseth in the news this week, I’ve noticed him using a particular rhetorical tactic: packaging highly ideological messaging to the military & public w/ (superficially) reasonable & substantive policy proposals. Before I explain what he is up to and why it matters, here are three examples: