David Schleicher

@profschleich.bsky.social

Professor, Yale Law School.

✨Schrödinger’s Crosswalk ✨, joint work with a terrific interdisciplinary team, under submission to law reviews now. It’s a bit unconventional (6,600 words, including a table, plus maps) but, we hope, appealing for the right journal.

Crosswalks carve out a refuge where motorists must yield to people 
outside the vehicle. But crosswalks are creatures not just of engineering, but 
of law. The law everywhere protects pedestrians on foot in crosswalks, but 
that category is narrower than many likely expect. This Article shows that 
crosswalk protections vary widely and sometimes contradict the ordinary 
expectations of road users. Far from a safe harbor, the result is a form of 
jeopardy by law—a physical and legal space this Article calls Schrödinger’s 
crosswalk.
This Article presents the first comprehensive study of crosswalk right-of-
way law across all 50 U.S. states. Drawing on a systematic review of state 
statutes, administrative codes, and judicial decisions, it maps drivers’ legal 
obligations toward different categories of crosswalk users, including 
pedestrians on foot, wheelchair users, babies in strollers, bicyclists 
(conventional and electric), and e-scooter riders. In some states, drivers must 
yield to a person crossing in a wheelchair but not to a baby in a stroller; in 
others, the same crossing offers only ambiguous legal protection. A recent 
70% surge in pedestrian fatalities makes strengthening these protections 
urgent.
The Article follows its comprehensive study with a recommendation as 
bold as it is straightforward: states should amend statutory language 
governing crosswalks to map onto the intuitive concept of a pedestrian as 
someone unprotected by a vehicle. Like the cat in Erwin Schrödinger’s 
famous thought experiment—simultaneously alive and dead until observed—
a non-motorist today may be legally required to use a crosswalk yet not 
legally protected in it. As the population ages, transportation technology 
evolves, and SUVs and trucks grow further in popularity, this protection must 
be clarified and fortified.

Michelle Wu seems like kind of a disaster for housing in Boston – very little progress on land use reforms, and supporting a quite draconian statewide rent control regime (rent hikes that can be below inflation, vacancy controls, only a 10-year exemption for new construction)? Yikes

Wu Backs Rent Control, Rejects Citywide Rezoning

Boston's mayor threw her support behind a ballot question legalizing rent control, while rejecting any moves to legalize denser housing in single-family districts.

bankerandtradesman.com

this is so embarrassing. why is @justinbrannan.bsky.social endorsing our fuelgrannie retweeting local NIMBY gadfly for city council when she literally stood with Vickie Paladino and Curtis Sliwa at a protest against the affordable housing ballot measures

laylalawgisiko
CITY COUNCIL MEMBER
LUSTIN BRANNAN
ENDORSES
LAYLA LAW-GISIKO for city council
LAYLA
LAW-GISIKO
8
laylalawgisiko I'm proud to have Justin Brannan's support. He has fought for public education. I will be a champion of public schools in our great district.Layla Law-Gisiko 罗蕾菈 reposted
fuelgrannie @fuelgrannie •2d
Replying to @jmaxmann openly and wrongly
Yimbro Bingo
...
NIMBY!
JUST BUILD
MARKET RATE
Austin
I'm fine with leveloper profits
Supply and
Demand
cor
ComparisonLayla speaking with Sliwa and Paladino

Who isn't at those community board meetings where people line up to oppose developments? @profschleich.bsky.social explains why NIMBYism is so successful: it's about who attends versus who is actually impacted. This is democracy meets housing policy. www.vitalcitynyc.org/articles/loc...

Vital City | Local Democracy is Land-Use Policy

NIMBYism is an outgrowth of the shape of civic participation in our cities — and producing more housing means changing the dynamics.

vitalcitynyc.org