Molly Moore

@mollysdailykiss.bsky.social

Sex blogger and general filthiness. I like it dirty. You can find oh so much Molly on my blog https://mollysdailykiss.com/ and even MORE Molly on Only Fans https://onlyfans.com/mollysdailykiss Also on Mastodon https://kinkyelephant.com/@mollysdailykiss

Elizabeth Warren on people who say Dems needs to tone down their rhetoric: "Oh, please. Why don't you start with the president of the United States? And every ugly meme he's posted and every ugly word."

Imagine if BBC spent as much time on the dangers of climate collapse as they do on immigration. Imagine the public response when they realise what the real danger is to our children & who is causing it. Instead of anger at refugees there’d be anger at oil companies, media bosses, politicians & BBC.

Keeping track of people withdrawing from the Polari Prize Longlist over the inclusion of proud self-described "TERF" John Boyne. Let me know as we get updates on authors pulling their books in protest.

Polari first book prize Longlist with Sacha coward, Jason okundaye, Amy twigg, and Mae diansangu's books crossed out to show they've withdrawn The Polari book prize Longlist, with no books withdrawn by authors.

The employee asked the girl and her mother if they needed help shopping. That’s it. That’s all. The misinformation, the insinuations (because the facts are inconveniently benign) are EXACTLY what was done to lesbians in the 80s. This is the product of hate and fear, not reality.

JK Rowling tweeting got a boycott of M&S, stretching facts to the breaking point, and making the world a worse place for absolutely everyone.

When people declare that they can ‘separate the art from the artist’, the unspoken addendum is always: ‘in this case.’ Which should prompt the question: why *this* one? NEW BLOG: 4.5k words on transphobe JK Rowling + Harry Potter TV. What a treat (sorry). www.girlonthenet.com/blog/separat...

The facile debate about separating art from artist | Girl on the Net

Should we be separating art from artist? A long rant in which I explain why this question is utter nonsense, using transphobe JK Rowling as an example.

girlonthenet.com

Right-wing billionaires continue to funnel money into Substack. The Chernin Group? Owned by Rupert Murdoch's former right-hand man. If you're on Substack, you're on the platform equivalent of News Corp.

The funding, which is the company’s series C round, was led by investors at technology investment firm BOND and Peter Chernin’s The Chernin Group. Other participants include VC firm Andreessen Horowitz; Rich Paul, CEO and founder of Klutch Sports Group; and Jens Grede, CEO and co-founder of Skims, the apparel company co-founded by Kim Kardashian. 

The round values Substack at $1.1 billion and brings its total funding to date to about $200 million.
Anuj Ahooja@quillmatiq.com · last yr.

"Owned" by @eoinhiggins.bsky.social dives into the history behind how Substack (and media platforms like it) became yet another online Nazi bar. Substack is not journalistic independence. It's another trap laid by billionaires to maintain their stranglehold on the media.

So who here has verified their account? What do they ask for? Very reluctant to give my data to techbros to be honest. I need to delete my account on Twitter but contemplating doing it here too. Anyway, tell me about verifying if you have done it, please

I've been fighting for porn and erotica to be normalized my whole life. If a sex creator has ever made your life better/sexier/healthier/more fun/safer, tell them. Be proud of it. Buy their books. Shout it from the rooftops. Support the shit out of them.* *esp true for queer/trans/BiPoC creators

AI boosters get mad when I describe LLMs as "Spicy Autocomplete." Sure, it's a bit reductionist ("stochastic parrot" is more precise), but it's far worse for people to see LLMs as "ineffable superintelligence," as WSJ did by claiming ChatGPT expressed "self reflection." No, it didn't.

Zoomer Antimillenarian@surcomplicated.bsky.social · last yr.

The harsh truth is that computer literacy peaked more or less contemporaneously with the infamous "series of tubes" incident, because as computer interfaces got better most ppl stopped learning anything about how they work. But as computers & algos get better, this ignorance gets more dangerous.

Apart from anything else, I promise that your creative solution is one adult creators have already thought of. We too have brains. We probably also know more about the law, platform rules, and what is possible. If porn bans could be solved with one clever idea, we’d have done it long ago.