Whitney Trettien

@whitneytrettien.bsky.social

Penn professor & author, CUT/COPY/PASTE (2021). Weird old books & technologies, thinking about data, craftwork, feminist media histories. Creative/critical. Libraries are dope. Still a punk.

Congrats to all those who nurtured this incredible network. I was a HASTAC scholar in 2009. It gave me the courage to pursue the kind of scholarship *I* wanted to when everything/everyone else in grad school told me not to. I try to carry that forward. HASTAC might be gone, but the flame stays lit.

Cathy Davidson@cathyndavidson.bsky.social · 3d ago

Today, we announced that HASTAC is closing as an interactive social network after 25+ years of innovative, exciting, and equitable learning, scholarship, and community focusing on technology and its impact on society. educational-cultural-institutions.hastac.hcommons.org/2026/09/29/s...

At the MoMA today for THE SURREALIST BOOK, a fabulous new exhibit by Jodi Hauptman & Starr Figura. Ft. artists' books from the Zell collection, spanning surrealism to the present. I wrote the catalogue's epilogue on artsy bookmaking & "new" media. It was fun. Come see these gorgeous books.

The Surrealist Book: Tomorrow Lives in Mirrors | MoMA

Exhibition. Oct 4, 2026–Jan 23, 2027. A book bound with shards of shattered glass. A manifesto enshrined in polished metal. Love poems seamlessly merging with solarized photographs. For artists and wr...

moma.org

Why did everyone rag so hard on participation trophies, my 5yo just brought one home and I'm proud as punch. Not because I don't believe in academic achievement (duh), but because it awarded a v small thing he actually *has* been working hard on, and I could tell he appreciated it being recognized.

In the 1860s, chess player Howard Staunton produced a photo-facsimile of Shakespeare's First Folio. It was one of the earliest attempts to use new technology to reproduce an old book. @folger.edu has Staunton’s proof sheets. I looked at them last week. If you like media/books/history, they're fun.

“How on earth came the t turned into s?!!!!”

On Howard Staunton’s photozincographic facsimile of Shakespeare’s First Folio

whitneytrettien.substack.com

In an essay from 1950, Norbert Weiner describes a guy who buys a player piano. It's clear he doesn't care about music, he's only interested in the mechanics of the thing. For Weiner, this is the difference between KNOW-HOW (technical skill) and KNOW-WHAT (how to use tech for human flourishing).

Quote from Norbert Weiner reading: "Some years ago, a prominent American engineer bought an expensive player-piano. It became clear after a week or two that this purchase did not correspond to any
particular interest in the music played by the piano but rather to an overwhelming interest in the piano mechanism. For this gentleman, the player-piano was not a means of producing music, but a means of giving
some inventor the chance of showing how skillful he was at overcoming certain difficulties in the production of music. This is an estimable attitude in a second-year high-school student. How estimable it is in one of those on whom the whole cultural future of the country depends, I leave to the reader."

fascinated by this next layer of abstraction, where the text becomes something else entirely, a substrate where its historical and geographic idiosyncrasies can become a problem (or opportunity), and wonder how it might change, or is already changing, how we talk about digitization

It's a contrast to the first few decades of digitization, where the point of digitization was initially conceived as preserving and disseminating books themselves in a new form. Digitization also made it possible to extract information *from* them new ways, including for scholars. I find myself +

I can’t stop thinking about Anthropic’s destructive book scanning. Obviously, it’s gross. People love books. Destroying books makes people mad. Even books they don't actually care about. AI companies know this, that’s why they try to keep their weird behavior a dirty little secret.

New from 404 Media: a company is selling tons of old books specifically to AI companies and says they have a strong NDA to never reveal which AI company bought all of the books. They don't want headlines of 'we scanned and destroyed millions of books for AI' www.404media.co/ai-companies...

AI Companies Are Buying Tons of Old Books Because They're Free of AI Slop

ISBNdb, a company that sources printed books for AI companies to turn into training data, tells clients “the optics problem is real.”

404media.co

I love the sentiment and agree with it! But this is a very temperate zone perspective. The tropics are another manner. As someone born and raised in Puerto Rico, maintaining my book collection was a constant battle against mold, flying termites, humidity (book covers stick together), and so on.

max koss 🦩@maxkoss.com · 3mo ago

The nice things about books: once you own them, you own them, forever. No one will be eye tracking your reading habits. No one will make money of you reading the book as many times as you'd like. And the very same book can be read by generations to come. It can last centuries, literally. It's great.

next up is this incredible small, black book by Mindy Seu the size of a smartphone that turns Instagram Stories (which evolved into a live lecture-performance) into a performance script. it is a deeply moving, feminist account of the early Web that includes some painfully pointed moments 1/2

light skinned left hand holds a small black book the size of a smartphone. the only text that appears on the cover (in silver) reads "A SEXUAL HISTORY OF THE INTERNET / MINDY SEU"a light skinned hand holds open a book containing black pages and silver-colored text. the left page indicates the time elapsed in the original performance: 03:35. the text on the right page reads, "I'm looking for my third wife, and you'd make a great option."