Matt Zwolinski

@mattzwolinski.bsky.social

Philosopher. Co-author of The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism (Princeton, 2023), and Universal Basic Income: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford, 2023). Http://bleedingheartlibertarian.substack.com

I'm not much of a video guy, but you should definitely watch this one. The choice is *always* between democracy and some form of authoritarianism. It's never between democracy and something you find nicer. It is never, as some libertarians have put it, a choice between democracy and free markets.

Adam Gurri@adamgurri.liberalcurrents.com · 5d ago

You cannot understand democracy if you don't understand the alternatives. I walk through them in this video youtu.be/C_tz9Af8IAk

In this post, I consider @mattzwolinski.bsky.social's insightful recent article on libertarianism and democracy. Democracy is generally way better than authoritarianism. But recent events highlight importance and validity of libertarian critiques of its weaknesses: reason.com/volokh/2026/...

Libertarianism and Democracy

Matt Zwolinski is right to emphasize that democracy is generally superior to authoritarianism, but wrong to suggest it should be a central libertarian commitment. Moreover, recent events highlight the...

reason.com

Heba Gowayed is totally right, and there is a robust literature for it. Bureaucratic violence is harm administered without overt force, through decision-making, paperwork, inaction, and exclusion. It reads as separate stories because responsibility is distributed in ways that avoid accountability.

Heba Gowayed هبة جويد@hebagowayed.bsky.social · 2mo ago

A man died in ICE custody due to neglect of his leukemia. Gary Indiana has no power & water sources are contaminated — people with electric stoves have no way to boil it. These are told as separate stories but they’re the same fact of death by neglect written in different fonts.

I am honored to be at the center of building a truly pluralistic school at @jhu.edu. I believe it's a duty to academia and to America. "Johns Hopkins has done more to promote ideological pluralism than most, placing it near or at 'the top of the leaderboard,' says higher ed scholar Neil Gross."

Inside one major school’s campaign to bring conservatives to campus * WorldNetDaily * by Vince Bielski, Real Clear Wire

Heading for 'uncharted' territory of becoming 'a citadel of ideological pluralism'

wnd.com

When government employees help elect the officials negotiating their contracts, it leads to capture, not countervailing power. And it hurts poor and minority communities most. @mattzwolinski.bsky.social explores this concentration of power in his latest essay. www.liberalism.org/p/the-power-...

The Power of Public Unions

Not all labor unions are alike. Public sector unions face different incentives, and they often bargain away better governance.

liberalism.org

When police officers violate constitutional rights, there should be accountability. @radleybalko.bsky.social traces how the Supreme Court has steadily dismantled the legal tools Congress created to provide accountability, and what it would take to restore it.

Federal Courts, Local Wrongs: How Qualified Immunity Gave Us Lawless Law Enforcement

In case after case, the U.S. Supreme Court has made it easier for police to get away with harming the innocent. Radley Balko looks at how the federal courts have gutted our protections against police ...

hubs.la

I am very happy to see this essay by @mattzwolinski.bsky.social on classical liberal approaches to wealth inequality. It's an important step for libertarians to recognize wealth inequality as a problem at all. Still, I find it dissatisfying. Short 🧵

The Power of Wealth

In every political system, wealthy and powerful people will try to write the rules to favor themselves. Liberal democracies should use a range of policy tools to resist elite capture.

liberalism.org

If you like arguments about why (and how) liberals should take wealth inequality seriously, drawing on Acemoglu and Robinson, Buchanan, Lindsey and Teles, Smith, etc..., boy have I got a book (chapter) for you... academic.oup.com/book/55806/c...

Paul Crider@paulcrider.liberalcurrents.com · 6mo ago

I am very happy to see this essay by @mattzwolinski.bsky.social on classical liberal approaches to wealth inequality. It's an important step for libertarians to recognize wealth inequality as a problem at all. Still, I find it dissatisfying. Short 🧵

Wealth inequality may not be unjust in itself, but wealth concentrated enough to purchase political influence is a problem classical liberals can no longer wave away. @mattzwolinski.bsky.social argues we already have what we need to address it. hubs.la/Q04dxjhz0

The Power of Wealth

In every political system, wealthy and powerful people will try to write the rules to favor themselves. Liberal democracies should use a range of policy tools to resist elite capture.

hubs.la

This is a really good discussion of how ideologies drift and fracture. The underlying philosophical principles and ideas underdetermine the ideology. The real work is done more by sociology and social attachments. Libertarianism is just the example here. Applies generally.

Matt Zwolinski@mattzwolinski.bsky.social · 6mo ago

New essay: the tribe comes first, the philosophy comes second. Even for libertarians. Maybe especially for libertarians.