Christian Goeschel

@drgoeschel.bsky.social

Professor of Modern European History at the University of Manchester. https://www.chbeck.de/goeschel-hedinger-muenchen-38/product/37979255 https://yalebooks.co.uk/book/9780300254730/mussolini-and-hitler/

31 July, a dark day in German history. On this day in 1932, the Nazi party won the Reichstag elections, gaining 37.3 % and 230 seats. The election campaign was the most violent one in modern German history to date.

There’s a permanent modern British history post going at Manchester 🎉Come and join a great department and please share with anyone who might be interested. (Don’t let the short deadline put you off). #skystorians 🗃️

Lecturer in Modern British History (post-1800) at The University of Manchester

Apply now for the Lecturer in Modern British History (post-1800) role on jobs.ac.uk - the leading job board for higher education jobs. View details.

jobs.ac.uk

Academic departments deserve to be saved, supported, resourced, allowed to grow even if they're not "best in the country," "first in the REF," "top-ranked," "at a Russell Group uni," or whatever other austerity-brained nonsense senior managers have been using to flimflam you out of solidarity

Makerfield result is extraordinary: A swing back to governing party in a by-election is exceptional. Winning absolute majority of the vote in a seat with Reform friendly demographics is exceptional. Doing both on an increased turnout when your party is polling under 20% is truly exceptional

1. How common is LLM use in scientific publishing, and how does it vary across field, publisher, journal prestige, author demographics etc.? @kylesiler.bsky.social has new paper in PNAS that addresses this question on a massive scale: 7.3 million papers from Elsevier, PLOS, MDPI, and Frontiers.

The diffusion of large language models in published academic articles | PNAS

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly changing academic research, raising questions of who is adopting these tools and under what conditions. Th...

pnas.org

This is an enormously important point. The scope and values of any scholarly field are self-defined by those who practice it. If we grant corporate interests the legitimacy to establish these definitions, it is obvious that they will define a field such that their tools surpass human ingenuity.