If you teach datavis and don’t include this next time on “why datavis is only very mildly about computation and very much about power politics and number-washing nonsense” (and you *are* saying that, right?) you’ve failed as an instructor, I don’t know what else to say.
The placement of "trans issues" here is, without exaggeration, one of the most depraved things I've ever seen in the pages of this publication.