Eric Jackson

@ejaxon.bsky.social

I'm increasingly convinced that people who say "numbers never lie" have never worked with real data. Numbers absolutely lie, and they lie in multiple insidious ways that can only be predicted by people with actual expertise in the subject matter the data is attempting to measure.

Good news, the answer is(was?) no. Every few years similar charts make the rounds. Usually to blame smartphones for declines, but more recently LLMs. What really happened is this: High school completion rates in OECD countries are going up. This pulls PISA scores down. It's a one-time shift.

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · last mo.

one for the "cognitive deskilling" files (from The Economist's FB account). surprised both by the pace of the decline and that math and reading scores seem to move more closely together than math and science scores, though I'm not at all familiar with this test and what it asks students to do

Image of a graph of OECD-23 countries, average PISA test scores on the y axis and time on the x axis. Some fluctuations in the 2000s and 210s but steed declines in math and reading scores starting around 201 (from ~500 to ~465) 8 and a more modest decline in science scores (from ~495 to ~485). the graph includes the addendum "*20 points is equivalent to one year of schooling"

What horseshit. She embraced gay people at the height of the AIDS crisis, embraced trans people at the height of the war against them, supported Black communities and artists, and wrote the most pro-worker's rights feminist pop song of all time. Neutral my ass

CNN@cnn.com · 2mo ago

"At a time when no American celebrity seems immune from the country’s many divisions, Dolly Parton was a crossover icon who stayed neutral in the culture wars while still speaking her mind," writes Zachary B. Wolf. | Analysis

Wikimedia, the nonprofit behind Wikipedia, is refusing to voluntarily recognize the union a supermajority of its employees voted for and has retained a well-known union-busting legal firm to represent it before the NLRB. I emailed them today letting them know I will no longer be donating.

I have been a small but faithful annual donor to Wikimedia for years. I deeply value the role wikipedia has played in our information ecosystem, and I personally benefit from it on a regular basis. I have always felt that I should contribute in acknowledgment of those benefits. 

More recently, I have also  tried to play my small part in disrupting the negative influence of AI on sites like Wikipedia. I make a point of never reading the AI summary at the top of Google search results, going instead to the sites below the summary which provide its content. More often that not, the top site is Wikipedia and I deliberately go there to get the information.

I will NOT be donating to Wikimedia this year, nor will I donate again in the future for as long as Wikimedia maintains its anti-union stance. All workers, including those working at your organization, have a right to organize as a way to balance their power against that of organizational management. Not only that, but I believe all workers should organize -- our society as a whole would benefit from more balanced perspectives in decision-making across all types of organizations. Nonprofits are no exception.

I do hope to hear in the future of a change of heart at Wikimedia and at that point I will consider restarting my donations.

New w @pamherd.bsky.social: Mamdani just announced PIT Crew — an NYC tech unit that will build digital public products. Takeaway: Mamdani is reclaiming a vision of tech in govt for progressives, one not driven by consultants and which solves real problems. 🧵 donmoynihan.substack.com/p/mamdani-in...

Mamdani invests in tech capacity to “solve real problems”

What PIT Crew says about how he is governing, and tech in government

donmoynihan.substack.com

It is endlessly astonishing to me that anyone is ever surprised by Donald Trump. There has never been a more transparent human being in all of history. Everything you need to know about him is right on the surface. You can understand him entirely, without remainder, with five minutes of exposure.

The Israeli Ultra-Hawks Who Feel Betrayed by Trump’s Iran Deal

Isaac Chotiner interviews Shimon Riklin, an anchor on Israel’s right-leaning Channel 14, and a Benjamin Netanyahu ally, who feels stabbed in the back by Trump’s Iran deal.

newyorker.com

Nice articulation of Constitution's *thick* accountability vs the narrow/thin one of unitary executive theory. Impt for nat'l governance, but interesting too for local: how to design a system able to wrestle productively w interests varying across dimensions: space, time, level of abstraction.

Josh Chafetz@joshchafetz.bsky.social · 4mo ago

I've just posted a new (fairly short!) paper on unitary executive theory's impoverished theory of democratic accountability. Give it a read -- I'd love to hear any thoughts! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

There is a problem with the stories we tell & the way we perceive how change happens. The Union of Pinnacle Tenants, the largest tenant-led union in NYC—are the reason Mamdani took action. Organized people power is pivotal. Top down stories of elected heroes (even ones we like) are not sufficient.

Robert Reich@rbreich.bsky.social · 4mo ago

In January, Zohran Mamdani took action against bankrupt landlord Pinnacle, which was responsible for over 5,000 housing violations. Thanks to his intervention, Pinnacle's new owners have forgiven millions in tenants' back rent. This is what governing for the people looks like.

One of the more misogynistic takes currently trending in the AI policy space is "women use less AI than men because they have less tech literacy" Ok but have you considered that women use less AI than men because we have more tech literacy?

This is the fundamentally false premise that people believe, despite all evidence to the contrary.🤷🏿‍♂️ The truth is: 1) Negative, divisive content, is not the most engaging content. It's not close. 2) Algorithms reward negative, divisive content, because billionaires buy platforms and make it so.

Stephan Lewandowsky@lewan.uk · 6mo ago

The core problem: the attention economy. Platforms maximise engagement, not truth. Algorithms reward negative, emotional & divisive content — not because of malice, but because that's what keeps eyes on screen. Democracy pays the price. 2/10

"When in doubt, draw a distinction." Not sure where he got it, but in grad school one of my teachers taught me that. This (long) thread is about the key distinctions I rely on as a critic. There's a Twitter version from 2021. This one builds on that one. I will post them one at a time. Ready?

Nice thread. "Bottom line: System planning extends beyond minimizing costs. If we want models to inform planning and policy, non-economic deployment limits need to be explicit, transparent, and stress-tested."

John Bistline@bistline.bsky.social · 10mo ago

#ModelingMonday: A key modeling assumption with big consequences is non-economic deployment constraints. Permitting, land access, local ordinances, supply chains, social acceptance. These shape what can get built but are tricky to model.