ersatzGrace

@ersatzgrace.bsky.social

IA/UXer, always thinking, often making. systems delight. www.lenthic.com www.smudgingthebinary.com

I have a geeky taxonomy question for people today. 😄 I know at least @doriantaylor.com has thought about this, and I'm guessing a whole bunch more. I've finally been convinced to really dig into my using the "IT/information technology" label in my writing. But then...what do I call the behemoth?

Diagram of loosely nested paradigms: Information, subbed with Context, subbed with Information architecture, subbed with Information systems, subbed with Technology, and finally the thing I'm trying to label.

Your role isn't the exception for LLM's. The difference is your perspective and experience of the info. It's that this is the information _everyone's_ core competencies look like with pre-existing understanding. What looks "about right" from the outside is a mess from the inside. Across the board.

After ~10 years of trying to contain my data footprint, I now have email accounts over a year old that have no spam. Three of them have no spam filters installed. One is used for shopping. 🤞I didn't just present a challenge ❤️ sometimes the sensed-impossible can be done

A legally blind, 65 yr-old woman: has unintentionally lost 28 pounds because she can't afford food under Trump. "The end is coming near. Under Joe Biden I received $80 SNAP per month & was able to put away $100 per month for food. Trump took that away from me." #sheshed

I see a clearer narrative of right/left developing. Problem: it's defined by the right. They claim money, AI, male dominance, and power dynamics as their territory. And anyone who cares needs to be beat down as not-right, so must-be-left, so against-us. those definitions are telling.

People can say it’s utopian or dreamy but it’s a fact that you have to believe new things are possible, fundamentally, in order to make them real. You have to make the choice to believe that more than this is possible & not be resigned to this being the way things have to be because it’s not at all.

Goertzel discusses with Epstein future scenario for "an AGI economy": "for the AGI parasite to overcome to regular-human-economy host (so it can grow to be more than a parasite and eventually gain its own superhuman autonomy) it first needs to suck off the resources of the host"

Goertzel to Epstein:

About the issue of allowing conversion of real $$ into AGI Tokens....
I do understand there is greater legal/regulatory risk in doing it this way=..
On the other hand, I don't see any other way to make the thing really grow to exceed Google, FB etc. in size (or even become self-supporting)...
Basically, we need real-world users who need Al services for their businesses to outsource their work to Agents in the SingularityNET and these real-world businesses have their assets in fiat currency...

...the world needs to have ways to turn fiat back and forth into AGI tokens...
Eventually maybe not, if the AGI economy overtakes the normal-world economy. But for the AGI parasite to overcome to
regular-human-economy host (so it can grow to be more than a parasite and eventually gain its own superhuman autonomy) it first needs to suck off the resources of the host, and these resources are now mainly expressed in fiat currency...

My latest for Liberal Currents. A substantial portion of conservatives want to be rich people in a poor country because it affords them a greater sense of hierarchy and power. We misunderstand that at our peril, but making it clear and not affording them the benefit of the doubt could save us.

Liberal Currents@liberalcurrents.com · 6mo ago

"One of the best takeaways those of us on the left or the center can hold is that tariffs, the annihilation of the safety net, aggressive tax cuts, and all of their other fiscal policies are not about enrichment as an end unto itself: they’re about impoverishment as a means to reinforce hierarchy."

So while talking about the Epstein files, which has spawned a new "Epstein Class" name because of all the wealthy people involved; Bondi is citing an upsurging stock market, which is more indicative of the finances of the wealthy than of everyday people; as a...benefit? a sign of 'no foul done'?

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 6mo ago

Bondi crashes out over Epstein: "The Dow is over 50,000 dollars! I don't know why you're laughing. You're a great stock trader as I hear, Raskin. The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. That's what we should be talking about."