Fede Holm

@federicoholm.bsky.social

Research Scientist @progressivereform.bsky.social - PhD Env & Nat Resources (OSU SENR), former postdoc UMich, CSU. Clean energy, socio-ecological systems, climate change.

That's what taxes are, man. That's the definition of taxes. "You are subsidizing things you might never use" man shut the fuck up. My taxes currently subsidize like oil company exec private jets, you think I'm upset at low-income people eating inexpensive bananas?

USA TODAY Opinion@usatodayopinion.usatoday.com · 3d ago

Opinion: Mamdani's idea may sound appealing, but it's NYC taxpayers who will take the hit, subsidizing discounts they may never even use.

I would be remiss if I did not also point out that Congressional permitting reform legislation would only fuel Project 2025's goal of ever more exploitation & extraction in the Greater Chaco landscape. i.e., Project 2025 and permitting reform go together like toxic peanut butter and jelly.

westernlaw.org

Platner marketed himself as a progressive who looked and acted "like a Republican." The irony is that he really did act like a Republican -- racist, antisemitic, and alleged sex criminal -- but, because he identified as a *not* Republican -- these actions were all disqualifying.

Vraiment quel scandale que les gens ne veuillent pas qu'on pulvérise des pesticides à 3m de chez eux! Ils peuvent pas se taire et laisser les agriculteurs utiliser les pesticides interdits et perturbateurs endocriniens que j'aurais fait autoriser tranquilles?! 😱

Les Écologistes au Sénat@ecologistesenat.bsky.social · last mo.

À écouter en entier 😱 ⤵️ Au Sénat, cette séquence méprisante au sujet des neo-ruraux vous est offerte par la ministre de l'Agriculture. 🤯 Les gens à la campagne ont encore le droit de refuser que leur maison soit aspergée de pesticides ? #UrgenceAgricole

These are precisely the sort of reforms that Abundance-pilled Democrats are working to legislatively entrench via "permit reform," a euphemism for negotiations with Trump Republicans to cede control of our future to energy & technology companies. It's just bipartisan looting.

Trump officials to slash public input on fossil fuel drilling on federal lands

Plan to limit scrutiny of polluters and shift financial risks to taxpayers is attack on democracy, advocates say

theguardian.com

The progressive case for ground-mounted solar and grid-scale batteries: everyone benefits from the grid not fucking collapsing when it gets hot, not just those who can afford private solar and batteries.

Controversial take perhaps, but I think you can install air-conditioning and shutdown data centers at the same time. maybe even steal all the air-conditioning units from the data centers and install them in public housing. Then run them off solar and battery while taxing the hyper rich to death

This is a perfidious essay. It's pathos-inflected argument asks everything of people and nothing of AI Tech companies and their Billionaire overlords. Absolutely nothing. They are treated as a force of nature to be mitigated, not a human institution subject to a democracy's sovereign dominion.

Democratic Governance of AI Is the Real Solution

The potential for serious negative effects from the AI boom demands robust deliberation and real democratic governance. Data center moratoria won’t get us there.

jacobin.com

I got inside a European AI energy summit in Brussels last month, and the mood among gas industry players was buzzing. The UK and EU are about to unveil regs determining whether Europe's AI boom can be gas powered - even if its a disaster for the climate. Will they bow to Big Tech pressure? More👇

DeSmog@desmog.com · 3mo ago

🔴 NEW - Inside the Plot to Cover Europe with Gas-Powered AI Data Centres Gas turbine manufacturers are confident they will win the battle over whether Europe’s AI boom will be powered by fossil fuels. 📝 @rtakver.bsky.social