Giovanni Campagna

@gcampax.com

Certifiable human. Was a PL->ML researcher, now leading engineering at GetWIQ.ai . EU native, US currently. Opinions are a weighted average of everyone around me (the weights are mine). he/him

If you want Bluesky to take down Twitter, you should want Bluesky to become home for a wider variety of content. That doesn't mean they should allow Nazis on here, of course. But keeping this a safe echo chamber is way less valuable than breaking the hold of the Zuccs and Elons of the world.

REMINDER: A main argument against US aid to Ukraine is the US badly needed to husband missiles and air-defense for the possibility of war with China. Then the US used that and more on war with Iran. And the supposed China hawks said nothing, confirming that they were Russia sympathizers all along.

We need a term for the eerie uncertainty about whether you’re talking to a human. I just called a hospital line that handles urgent situations, which I use routinely. Today, the receptionist had an old-school synthetic cadence, odd delay timing, and sounded like a script.

Yesterday I watched John Stewart's interview with Cory Doctorow. One reason for the insane push for data centers is so when gig economy workers get paid, the computer rounds down the cents to the nearest cent, and keeps the difference. It's called micro wage theft and it's destroying our oceans

Bild

"Do birds enjoy flying? An analysis of affect after flight in galah (Eolophus roseicapilla)" "One may have wondered whether birds that are flying without any clear purpose may in fact be enjoying themselves. … We found that all individuals almost always choose to fly when given the opportunity,"

thebes@vgel.me · 2mo ago

I think my most genuinely unpopular take is that a widely held and genuine consumer preference for cheaper, lower-quality goods, not private equity, is driving the decline in quality of consumer goods like clothing and housewares.

1) Artisinal code is unfortunately meaningless. The industrialization of our craft is improving quality. So, this is irrelevant. 2) “The point is the code” vs “The point is the software”

Bild

Weirdest thing, there's this one ad email that I started receiving, that I can't report spam to. I click Report spam, it asks for confirmation, I confirm, it instead says "unsubscribed and archived", and nothing happens, the email is still there. Google doing something very shady there for sure.

The constant debate on AI for swe boils down to one divider: do you like reading code? Most ppl hate it. They don't want to review code. They find other ppl's code gross. "Who wrote this garbage" is the common attitude of someone inheriting a large codebase.

Reminder: I want to see more @puzzmo.com accounts when I'm on Bluesky! Help me juke my stats, if you've hooked bsky to Puzzmo, but don't have a paid account; DM me your profile link in the next 6 days and I'll gift you a year's sub (The link is in the dropdown when you click on your nav avatar)

FWIW "I appreciate the pushback" is not a turn of phrase I've seen enough to annoy me, so perhaps it's ChatGPTese not Claudish. Which suggests to me, people would be far more normal about this if they were exposed to a wider variety of models. Le Chaton Fat, you're our only hope.

Giovanni Campagna@gcampax.com · 4d ago

I think a non trivial source of the opposition to LLM writing is that it's everywhere. There's a lot of LLM generated content. It's everywhere. It's always the same. It's trite. It's grating. I have to read a lot of LLM text for work, and I'm starting to hate the unnecessary flourishes.

I think a non trivial source of the opposition to LLM writing is that it's everywhere. There's a lot of LLM generated content. It's everywhere. It's always the same. It's trite. It's grating. I have to read a lot of LLM text for work, and I'm starting to hate the unnecessary flourishes.

I keep hearing this argument, but this would only be true if providers were selling "energy with extra steps" (energy cost + minimal profit margin) Recent evidence suggests instead that the main cost for providers is the infra capex. And you already own your own infra for other reasons!

fry69@fry69.dev · 4d ago

I hope people who hype such reports up know that at these extremely low token/s speeds energy costs for running a computer may vastly exceed what any API provider asks. Data center are extremely efficient. You cannot compete with that running locally, you can only compete on privacy.

That's because it's a misunderstanding of Rust actually cares about. It's not about memory safety - it's about undefined behavior. It's a direct response to the nasal daemons of C/C++ Crashing/erroring in a predictable, scoped, and ultimately debuggable way is the goal of Rust

waffle (recovering from EMF)@waffle.pet · 5d ago

I find it rather funny that rust programmers' "obsession" with "memory safety" can be laughed at from both sides of the programming language spectrum. functional pl enthusiasts might say that just being memory safe[^1] is not enough and rust does not help enough with program correctness[^2]. \

Every once in a while I see takes like this and I wonder what I'm doing differently. For me, every Opus since 4.6 has been basically indistinguishable wrt coding. 4.7 was better than 4.6 at non-coding instruction following, but that's it.

Post nicht verfügbar.