Patrick Giamario

@gennaionpseudos.bsky.social

I teach and write about political theory. I wrote Laughter as Politics: Critical Theory in an Age of Hilarity (EUP 2022) and am currently working on a new book on Plato's noble lie. Views expressed here are not those of my employer.

It’s increasingly difficult not to conclude that higher ed leaders, regardless of the wealth at their disposal, are now actively committed to undermining their institutions’ pedagogical missions. Whatever these leaders think their institutions ought to be doing, it’s something other than education.

The Harvard Crimson@theharvardcrimson.bsky.social · last wk.

The Harvard College Writing Center will no longer operate as a standalone unit after its director was laid off and its functions were consolidated, prompting backlash from current and former tutors. Abigail S. Gerstein and Amann S. Mahajan report. www.thecrimson.com/article/2026...

The fruits of government censorship policies. (The picture doesn't do it justice, but UNC Pembroke's compliance actually makes the inclusion/diversity theme *more* visible to passersby. The removed letters gloriously glisten in the sunlight.)

Bild

The absence of critical thinking skills exhibited and increasingly celebrated by the leaders of many of our colleges and universities does indeed make it difficult to defend the value of these institutions to the wider public. ai.uncg.edu/resources/pi...

ChatGPT Edu | AI at UNCG

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing higher education, research, and the workplace. During the coming year, UNCG faculty and staff will have the opportunity to explore ChatGPT Edu, OpenAI’s hig...

ai.uncg.edu

"Here’s the reality: If you, as an administrator or professor, care little about whether the education you offer is a quality product, and if you have little faith in the transformative power of that education, then these kinds of changes are going to be acceptable to you."

Dennis Hogan@dennismhogan.bsky.social · 3w ago

Many faculty have been sounding the alarm about the problems generative AI poses for student learning. Strangely, some higher ed administrations seem have emerged as major AI boosters. Why? As I write in the latest @hedgehogreview.bsky.social it's a labor story: hedgehogreview.com/issues/the-f...

If I hear one more university leader say they're making "tough decisions" about redundancies or worsening our employment conditions, I will scream. They are not making tough choices, they're making the easiest decisions in the world. Tough decisions would be fighting the inevitability of job losses

One of the more dispiriting rituals of contemporary academia is the end-of-the-year emails announcing the new crop of mostly unimpressive faculty who have been appointed to high-profile, well-paid, and largely meaningless administrative sinecures for the year ahead.

Conversations about the future of higher education in the US need to start from the unfortunate, basic fact that both Democrats and Republicans agree with Reagan that government should not subsidize curiosity driven learning and inquiry.

Given the argument that ended the VRA, I think it’s time liberals did some self reflection about the now decades long obsession with partisan polarization as the problem, as opposed to authoritarianism, extremism, oligarchy, and racism

A smart Democratic Party would have used the Jake Tapper book tour as an occasion not to complain about the DC press (which, to be clear, absolutely deserves our scorn), but to very publicly, shamelessly, and ruthlessly run the bus over Biden & his enablers as many times as was humanly possible.

Michael Caley@michaelcaley.bsky.social · 3mo ago

this from the new @gelliottmorris.com Strength in Numbers poll gets at the core problem for Democrats in winning over swing voters swing voters hated Joe Biden, they hated the inflation, they hated him running again and then hated how he dropped out www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-04-23...

Independents land somewhere different. Their complaints cluster around general dissatisfaction and messaging — the sense that they don’t know what Democrats stand for or what the party is actually trying to do. Two specific themes show up that don’t appear in the Democratic column: The first is a lingering Biden grievance: independents in our open-end repeatedly cite the party “lying about Biden’s health,” keeping his campaign going “far too long,” and “anointing” Kamala Harris as the nominee without a competitive process. The second is a leadership vacuum complaint — variations on “lack of leadership” and “I don’t know what they stand for.”

Previous hypes 1) Completely online colleges (no more residential campuses) 2) MOOCS 3) Interdisciplinary programs only (no more silos/disciplines) 4) Enrollment cliff (as if there wouldn’t be enough people for colleges to exist) 4) Coursera will replace lecturers 5) AI What else?

Prof Dynarski@dynarski.bsky.social · 4mo ago

The story of ed tech is a repeated loop of massive hype and massive disappointment See MOOCs, and now AI Evidence can interrupt this unproductive cycle The Stanford SCALE Initiative, led by rock star Prof Susanna Loeb, brings evidence to the conversation scale.stanford.edu/sites/defaul...