Adam Gracz

@graczlab.bsky.social

Genetic regulation of cell identity and regeneration | All things gut & liver | Opinions are my own | www.graczlab.org

NOA day! 🎉 Mentally exhausted after 14mo of waiting but relieved to have received the NOA for our R35 competitive renewal! Grateful to the hard working staff at NIGMS…thrilled to continue the lab’s work on chromatin and stem cell function in the intestinal epithelium!

What a great article not only on faculty workloads, but how little our salaries actually factor in to most university budgets. A few highlights. First, our salaries are falling:

Third, faculty salaries are falling even if we statistically control for faculty rank and institution. By our analysis of National Center for Education Statistics data, tenured and tenure-track salaries are down 10 percent in real terms since 2016 and are lower today than they were in 2002; nontenured faculty salaries are down 4 percent since 2016 and are at 2002 levels today.

To put this plainly: Suppose sharply increased teaching loads enabled institutions to cut one out of every seven full-time faculty. (That’s roughly what we saw last year in severe cuts announced at West Virginia, Western Illinois, and St. Cloud State Universities.) The associated savings in salary and benefits even through such drastic action would amount to less than 2.5 percent of total institutional expenditures for the typical university.

The upshot? If you think higher education has a cost problem, squeezing more teaching out of faculty is not the first place you should look.

When I explain to peeps how much we do in research labs for how few $$, they simply don’t believe me. I once explained it to a famous person from Pixar, he looked me square in the eye and said “You mean all the cancer, vision, and Alzheimer’s grants work that way? You’ve gotta be %#ing kidding me!”

Jason Rasgon@vectorgen.bsky.social · last mo.

The NIH is an ENORMOUS bargain for the American people. Do folk think that private industry will do the background slog work for drug discovery for 250K direct costs?

I wanted to give QED a chance, but couldn’t bring myself to sign up/share info to see their “review” of my preprints I know it’s a business, but it would be great to get past this era of endless tech-grift and engagement farming. We need to protect science from enshittification, not accelerate it

Ran Blekhman@blekhman.bsky.social · last mo.

I wanted to like QED's new 1% preprint ranking. I really did. But the more I looked at the data, the more uncomfortable it made me. Here is my full peer review. open.substack.com/pub/blekhman...

It’s often overlooked how much high-risk research in the US was driven by the BRAIN Initiative. Why? In part because of the design of the programs, but mostly because it injected a lot of money and increased grant success rates. There’s a lesson there. The hypercompetition of low success rates…

NIH has allocated just 33% of its normal budget this year, putting critical medical breakthroughs at risk. Johns Hopkins President Ron Daniels and University of Kansas Chancellor Dr. Douglas Girod are calling on the government to release it before the damage becomes permanent. https://bit.ly/4f3GuzR

President Daniels in WSJ op-ed: Get the federal science money flowing

JHU president, University of Kansas chancellor urge federal agencies to release congressionally appropriated funds to fuel America's research engine

hub.jhu.edu

Those of you submitting for the May 27th NIGMS MIRA deadline, are we supposed to or not supposed to include a myBibliography link in the Biosketch? The regular directions say No but the MIRA NOFO (PAR-26-121) says Yes. Which is it? Don't want this bounced for this reason.

OA is just conceptually silly IMO. Most working scientists can hardly understand/evaluate papers outside of our fields beyond a college level. We don’t write for public dissemination. I could probably hire a science writer to generate a public/lay summary of each of our papers for 25% of the APC…

Eugene Day, DSc@eugenedaydsc.bsky.social · 3mo ago

It was a scam from the outset, and it was obvious at the time. I don’t understand how academics fell so hard for it. The entire Open Everything movement is gawdawful. A few high minded ideals and a vast sea of grift and credulousness.

Yup. About 7mo ago I paid $2800 in OA for a society journal. Received a bill a month ago for another $2900 in page charges. This is on me for being busy and not fully understanding the APCs but also for being naive and assuming $2800 was a reasonable APC. Wrote to the EiC and of course no reply. ☹️

Drug Monkey@drugmonkey.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Nearing $5,000 for OA fees for entirely pedestrian journals. I still do not understand how NIH and Universities got played so hard on this. My U has a negotiated fee offset and it just seems like the publisher just added that to the charge to grants for no net reduction to the PI’s books.