Greg Atkinson

@gregatki.bsky.social

Honorary Visiting Professor at LJMU. Exercise & Nutrition Science, Circadian Rhythms and Jet lag, Research Methods & Statistics, Bike Racing, BBC6-played singer-songwriter. https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=8Gog69EAAAAJ&hl=en

Another example where smart clinical trialists and clinical trial statisticians are completely missing the boat: dichotomization of outcome measures and so-called "responder analysis".

I find this is a really odd story - why should world class biomedical research improve life expectancy in UK? What is keep life expectancy flat are a range of structural issues - not access to the latest medical treatments. 1/4 news.sky.com/story/world-...

World-class UK medical research not delivering enough benefits for British people

The country's life sciences industry generated £146.9bn in turnover in 2023/24, but UK life expectancy has fallen, a new study has found.

news.sky.com

Can common analytical methods generate spurious molecular #waves_of_aging? We show LOESS and DE-SWAN produce wave-like patterns from random noise, casting doubt on reported “waves." With MaddyCarbonneau, Kate Shutta, Jeff Miller, Michael Snyder, and Xiaotao Shen. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

LOESS and DE-SWAN can induce artifactual "waves" of molecular aging

A growing literature has investigated the relationship between age and biomolecular changes, leading to conclusions that aging occurs in discrete molecular "waves." Data summary tools such as LOESS an...

biorxiv.org

Selecting an effect size for power analysis is hard. Many researchers fall back on Cohen's thresholds, but they have no empirical basis and vary wildly by field. Our new paper offers a better option: field-specific effect size distributions built from meta-analytic data doi.org/10.3758/s134...

Abstract
Effect sizes are useful for understanding the magnitude of study results and for planning new studies via power analysis.
However, despite their wide usage, effect sizes are often misinterpreted. This is mostly due to an over-reliance on general
effect size benchmarks that were not intended for broad application across diverse research fields. Inaccurate effect size
interpretations can lead to incorrect conclusions about the magnitude of study results and incorrect sample size estimates,
thereby increasing the likelihood of false-positive results. This article introduces the ESDist R package, which is designed
to calculate empirically derived effect-size benchmarks or a range of reliably detectable empirical effect sizes for a specific
research question or field of interest by computing effect size distributions (ESDs). This package can be used on data that
can be easily extracted from pre-existing meta-analyses to help researchers more accurately plan new studies or to better
understand how an individual study might relate to other studies in their field. ESDist includes a set of features that make it
easy to use in a priori power analysis. Moreover, the package includes a feature for estimating effect size benchmarks that
account for publication bias and are weighted by effect sizes' variances, which addresses existing limitations of using ESDs
for study planning or interpretation.

The amount of 'precision' nutrition stuff that is just tossing multi-omics at trial with no real validation, and no real consideration of basic things like inter- vs intra- individual variation is really sad. Just flushing money down the toilet and then putting lipstick on the publication pig